Made with Love

FBI arrests New York cop for plan to cook, eat women

blackram

Reviewer
Joined
Dec 17, 2010
Messages
14,008
Not sure how they found out about him. But a lot of psychos, even within the police department.



"NEW YORK — A New York City police officer was charged on Thursday with conspiring to kidnap, torture, cook and eat women whose names he kept in a list on his computer. Gilberto Valle III, 28, of Forest Hills, Queens, was arrested on Wednesday by the FBI, a spokesman for the agency said.
In a criminal complaint unsealed on Thursday in Manhattan federal court, Valle was charged with conspiring to cross state lines to kidnap and with illegally accessing a federal database.
The complaint said investigators had uncovered a file on Valle’s computer containing the names and pictures of at least 100 women, as well as the addresses and physical descriptions of some of them."
 
blackram said:
Not sure how they found out about him. But a lot of psychos, even within the police department.



"NEW YORK — A New York City police officer was charged on Thursday with conspiring to kidnap, torture, cook and eat women whose names he kept in a list on his computer. Gilberto Valle III, 28, of Forest Hills, Queens, was arrested on Wednesday by the FBI, a spokesman for the agency said.
In a criminal complaint unsealed on Thursday in Manhattan federal court, Valle was charged with conspiring to cross state lines to kidnap and with illegally accessing a federal database.
The complaint said investigators had uncovered a file on Valle’s computer containing the names and pictures of at least 100 women, as well as the addresses and physical descriptions of some of them."

case sound weak

however the cop sounds deranged
 
What a psycho: I was thinking of tying her body onto some kind of apparatus… cook her over a low heat, keep her alive as long as possible
 
Cardinal Fang said:
You know it's times like these that I'm glad my sexual perversions are somewhat normal.

Who told you that your sexual perversions are somewhat normal? They're messed up big time!:biggrin2:
:rofl!:
 
HOF said:
Foiled a potential serial killer! Good work FBI.

OK, I'll admit making a list is a bit much, but charging him with all that because of a list he made? Come on...I make a shopping list all the time, doesn't mean I'm going to actually BUY everything on it.....jesus....

In addition, it is a well known therapy practice for people to say, write a letter to an ex but not mail it.....putting into words what you'd say to them is a great way to get it off your chest.....

Like I said, making a list of women you'd like to cook and eat is a bit much, but really, what's next? thought police? I mean saying to someone "do that again I'll kick your ass" you can be arrested for uttering a threat, now putting thoughts down on "electronic" paper is the same?

Now if they followed him and he was buying a really big cast iron pot and a steel tripod to hold it over a fire (like you see in cannibal cartoons) then yeah, arrest him but to arrest someone for a list?....I dunno about that......

Another good example is writing an email to someone you hate.....I've written tons of emails and not sent them...now does that mean if I leave it in my draft folder, anything I wrote in it is concrete according to the law? For example, I wrote an email to the person's realty rep who sold me my house threatening legal action, does that mean I have to go through with it?

If a woman takes a naked pic of herself, attaches it to an email, and doesn't send it, does that mean she MUST by law, send it?

That's pushing the boundaries......
 
tboy said:
OK, I'll admit making a list is a bit much, but charging him with all that because of a list he made? Come on...I make a shopping list all the time, doesn't mean I'm going to actually BUY everything on it.....jesus....

In addition, it is a well known therapy practice for people to say, write a letter to an ex but not mail it.....putting into words what you'd say to them is a great way to get it off your chest.....

Like I said, making a list of women you'd like to cook and eat is a bit much, but really, what's next? thought police? I mean saying to someone "do that again I'll kick your ass" you can be arrested for uttering a threat, now putting thoughts down on "electronic" paper is the same?

Now if they followed him and he was buying a really big cast iron pot and a steel tripod to hold it over a fire (like you see in cannibal cartoons) then yeah, arrest him but to arrest someone for a list?....I dunno about that......

Another good example is writing an email to someone you hate.....I've written tons of emails and not sent them...now does that mean if I leave it in my draft folder, anything I wrote in it is concrete according to the law? For example, I wrote an email to the person's realty rep who sold me my house threatening legal action, does that mean I have to go through with it?

If a woman takes a naked pic of herself, attaches it to an email, and doesn't send it, does that mean she MUST by law, send it?

That's pushing the boundaries......

Good points T, they should have followed him around for a bit. At the very least it would make for a stronger case against him if he was caught with the tools.
 
Now it certainly sounds like he has a screw loose, but then again, I think adults who dress like babies in diapers and pay women (and men) to change them after they took a dump in the diaper have a screw loose too.

But I guess there goes the crime novel market, according to this, anyone who writes down what might turn out to be fantasy, is liable to get arrested. I've read many novels where (the writer) writes in the first person and describes some pretty gory scenes...I guess they too can be arrested...dean koontz? if you're reading this, you're fucked!!!!

Again, if it was really just a fantasy, and he does get convicted, there goes our freedom because you just KNOW that other cases will use this as a precedent......
 
tboy said:
Again, if it was really just a fantasy, and he does get convicted, there goes our freedom because you just KNOW that other cases will use this as a precedent......

You're right, it's only words but in this freaks case it's obvious he had deadly intentions. Now, did he have the balls to actually go through with any of it, that's the unknown.
 
Guido said:
You're right, it's only words but in this freaks case it's obvious he had deadly intentions. Now, did he have the balls to actually go through with any of it, that's the unknown.

see, now that's the kicker and is a problem even when the authorities uncover terrorist plots: at what point do you determine whether a law has actually been broken?

For eg: some kids get together, have a few beers, and talk about breaking into the school....should they be arrested and thrown in jail? I mean, this is conspiracy to commit a b & e.....

The key here is if they can prove he actually had the....hmm....intention of going through with any of it.....

Put it another way: basically they are prosecuting him for what he might have done, not what he did....this borders on the theme of that tom cruise movie, minority report, where they use "psychics" to predict or prevent a crime from happening.....and arrest those who "might have" committed the crime.

So what's next, anyone who buys a performance car should be immediately charged with speeding since, and we ALL know this to be true, that they eventually MIGHT speed?

I mean, insurance companies already practice a form of this by automatically charging every young teen male more for insurance simply because the "odds" indicate that they will have an accident. So, even if a kid is an excellant driver, and never has an accident, they are prepaying for it.......

I still say it is opening a HUGE can of worms......
 
Conspiring with another party to commit kidnapping is illegal. Gathering informaton from law enforcement databases to have in his database of potential targets is illegal. Best to get him on conspiracy rather than waiting and regretting your inaction.
 
Transient said:
Conspiring with another party to commit kidnapping is illegal. Gathering informaton from law enforcement databases to have in his database of potential targets is illegal. Best to get him on conspiracy rather than waiting and regretting your inaction.

that's true, but what do you think about simply writing about it as opposed to actually doing something? Do you think that the same rules should apply to all emails or whatever we write to each other?

For example: in the DH thread there's been some women on there whose age is questionable. If one of us said "I'd do her" should they be arrested for conspiracy to commit statutory rape? Just remember, the stat rape charges will apply even if the women is 47 yrs old but appears to be underage......just remember: if your 35 yr old girlfriend dresses in a catholic school girl uniform, puts her hair in pig tails, you could be charged with stat rape.......

One way to settle this is to have him psychoanalyzed....a good shrink should be able to tell if he was just partaking in fantasy, or really had the wherewithall to go ahead with any of it.....

I mean, how many of us, at one time or another, been reamed by our boss and thought "oh fuck, I'd love to punch his lights out".....if you'd written that in an email, well, you see where I'm going.....
 
Back
Top Bottom