Made with Love

Festivus - The Airing of the Grievances

bobistheowl

BANNED
Joined
Oct 14, 2014
Messages
1,935
To: Stan Lee:

You are the original poster in this thread:


You've provided no link, nor any documentation to suggest that your are not the original author of this work. Your post is dated April 7, 2013.

This thread was revived on December 02, 2014, by UncleBob, (no relation), and caught my interest.

This link:

https://lottalaughs.blogspot.ca/2010/08/over-40-folks.html

from lottalaughs.blogspot.ca,dated Wednesday August 25, 2010, predates yours by more than 31 months, and is identical, with the exception that it is two sentences longer than yours.

You have a second post similar, in #20, that I didn't read.

I was suspicious of the authenticity of your authorship because of the presence of the word Napsters and the reference to the Cartoon Network.

Napster was a music file sharing system primarily from the late 1990's, that was effectively dead by 2001. It was never plural; that would be like having a clothing store called "The Gaps".

The Cartoon Network is part of the 'Turner' conglomerate of stations, and is unavailable in Canada, except by illegal satellite hookup.

Stan Lee, I've had no interaction with you here, I haven't read many of your posts, and there's no reason for that, other than that you probably post in threads that don't interest me.

This is a clean bust, without malice towards you. It's just good detective work.

I believe you owe us all a sincere, unconditional apology, for getting caught for an uncredited cut and paste. The statute of limitations on these never runs out, unless the thread is deleted, It might get buried, but it can always be revived.

More to follow.

In The Airing of the Grievances, I will have five additional grievances to air. Other than my say, for those five grievances, which may precede or follow a grievance against me by another member, I will offer no rebuttal towards any comment directed to me, now or in the future.

Please state your business, and I will read it. My five grievances will be posted after they are written. I will not read this thread, until all five of my grievances have been aired.

This is not my thread. This is the opportunity for anyone to air their grievance, get it out in the open, and resolve it, or end something.
 
bobistheowl said:
Sarah, your actions speak louder than your words.

Which actions are you referring to bob?

I took you off my ignore list today - don't disappoint me.
 
bobistheowl said:
To: Stan Lee:

You are the original poster in this thread:


You've provided no link, nor any documentation to suggest that your are not the original author of this work. Your post is dated April 7, 2013.

This thread was revived on December 02, 2014, by UncleBob, (no relation), and caught my interest.

This link:

https://lottalaughs.blogspot.ca/2010/08/over-40-folks.html

from lottalaughs.blogspot.ca,dated Wednesday August 25, 2010, predates yours by more than 31 months, and is identical, with the exception that it is two sentences longer than yours.

You have a second post similar, in #20, that I didn't read.

I was suspicious of the authenticity of your authorship because of the presence of the word Napsters and the reference to the Cartoon Network.

Napster was a music file sharing system primarily from the late 1990's, that was effectively dead by 2001. It was never plural; that would be like having a clothing store called "The Gaps".

The Cartoon Network is part of the 'Turner' conglomerate of stations, and is unavailable in Canada, except by illegal satellite hookup.

Stan Lee, I've had no interaction with you here, I haven't read many of your posts, and there's no reason for that, other than that you probably post in threads that don't interest me.

This is a clean bust, without malice towards you. It's just good detective work.

I believe you owe us all a sincere, unconditional apology, for getting caught for an uncredited cut and paste. The statute of limitations on these never runs out, unless the thread is deleted, It might get buried, but it can always be revived.

More to follow.

In The Airing of the Grievances, I will have five additional grievances to air. Other than my say, for those five grievances, which may precede or follow a grievance against me by another member, I will offer no rebuttal towards any comment directed to me, now or in the future.

Please state your business, and I will read it. My five grievances will be posted after they are written. I will not read this thread, until all five of my grievances have been aired.

This is not my thread. This is the opportunity for anyone to air their grievance, get it out in the open, and resolve it, or end something.

How do you find time to put this together, plus your other posts. You a retired rich guy or a poor man living off the government?.
 
Transient, I don't like you.

I'm not saying that I dislike you, but my opinion of you is less than neutral. I don't see that ever changing. I will give you my reasons.

1) You have shown me that you will do things specifically because you have been asked to not do them.

2) You will continue to do those same things, even after being asked to stop.

3) You will make a half-assed apology, forgive yourself, and do the same thing again, shortly afterwards, with a short interval of time, in lieu of remorse.

4) You make assumptions of motives, and draw conclusions based on those assumptions, usually by assuming that my motivations would be the same as yours would have been. For example, you think I care a lot about whether or not a lot of people read my posts. I really don't. I make a post when I feel like writing, or if I want to say something. If people want to read it, they will. If they don't, they won't. I just wanted to write it, and give them the option.

5) You justify your actions by mentioning the things that you give, as if that generosity on your part gives you an entitlement to take something from someone else in return. To me, this is like the guy who tells his civvie date that she owes him a blow job, because he paid for her lobster dinner. It's great that you make things for other people, but you didn't make them for me, and I didn't deface your work, but you did that to mine.

6) You offer advice when it has not been asked for, and when it is not needed, but your instructions are in-explicit; you know things, but are unable to teach them to other people, or chose not to.

Excerpts from a quoted post:

...I think I speak for many (if not, please correct me) in saying that these statements are pompous, arrogant, and will undoubtedly open you up as a target.
Communication is a two-way street bob, if you want to be understood, speak to your audience, not down to your audience.

There is a guideline some of us engineers try to follow: K.I.S.S. (keep it simple, stupid). The "stupid" here is not directed at you from me, but at yourself when you repeat this saying as a reminder.

I don't believe in pandering to the lowest common denominator. If people don't understand what I'm saying, they should not read my posts, (the long ones are usually written between midnight and dawn, when no one else is here).

I get the impression that a lot of people think they have some sort of obligation to read everyone's posts in every thread, as if this was high school twitter. Somebody says "I don't have five minutes to read that. Do you know how much paint I could watch dry in five minutes, or how many times I could refresh my browser in that time, while awaiting the next piece of fluff?" People ave time to read along piece I write, when they're waiting for someone else to post something.

Communication is only a two way street, if it happens at the same time. Most of the time, I'm here when other people aren't, so I can't interact with them in real time.

Maybe you think the formatting is pompous, but that's for people who may want to read some paragraphs, but not all of them, and other people might want to read different ones, or no one wants to read it. Once I've written it, my part is done, unless someone quotes me. Just because my light is green, doesn't mean I'm participating, and I think people should cut their own meat, instead if having it served in bite size chunks.

If I exclude people who either aren't very intelligent, or don't read quickly, or read too quickly, or are intimidated by having to use a scroll bar to read a whole post, then good, people should scroll past my post, without reading it. It would not be a good investment of their time.

7) You like to tell me helpful tips so that I can become more like you, as if that would be a self improvement, but I don't want to be like you, any more than you do.

8) I get the impression that you think a lot of my posts are meant for you. That's false. If I quote you, the reply is for you. Otherwise, it's not, but you can read it, if you want to.

To me, you're not an individual, you're a type. I know lots of guys like you, in life, and online, and I don't like any of them, either. You're audiopimp on another board, not literally, but you guys are pretty much exactly the same.

I see you as what I would call a 'closeted heterosexual', in that, you're not gay, but people frequently presume that you are. You're the guy who has a bitter streak, because he was born with no game, and failed to acquire one. If you see a pretty woman, you aspire to enter her friend zone. You set your goals low, so that you can always achieve them easily.

If you were an IT guy, and someone asked you how to do something, you would quickly do it for them, but not show them how they could do it themselves next time. You're the guy who starts talking to me on the elevator, we have a conversation for a moment, and when one of us exits, a guy says to me "Who is that?", and I say "I don't know".

You would be the guy who told me his name a few times, but I keep forgetting it, not as disrespect, but because it's not important enough to me to remember. If we both worked in the same office, and that office took birthdays seriously, I would put a looney in the envelope, sign just my name on the card, and not stop working when they served cake.

For the birthday of an admin assistant that I liked personally, regardless of her appearance, I would usually throw in $10, 15, or $20, and that would usually be more than anyone else, including management. When I was in my cubicle drone days, we had one secretary for five people in my area, and she spent about half of her time typing my stuff, and I would usually spend about $80 on a Christmas gift for her, and the other four might all sign the same card.

Since I find your personality, or my conception of your personality, unappealing, I would not chose you as a friend. You don't have much to offer that interests me.

This doesn't mean that I will seek out opportunities to confront you, but it does mean that I will also not seek out opportunities to interact with you. We'll cross threads from time to time, as we have, and I'll be civil with you, but not friendly. To me, you're a handle that writes things, words in a post, nothing more.
 
papasmerf, I know you are not a stupid man, but I frequently treat you as if you are, because you continuously give me reason to do so. This quote I found interesting:

Pussy shit

Bob has been logged in most of the past 3 hours and yet he is not here...................

From this quote, I had two amusing mental images. The first was the man who writes the papasmerf posts, sitting at home, in costume and makeup. He's sitting in front of that computer in Jerry Seinfeld's apartment, near the window, that he didn't use in any episodes. You have Windows '95, and AOL dial up Internet, and you have one browser window of Netscape open to The Lobby at HUBGFE. Every thirty seconds or so, you refresh the browser, to see if anyone has posted anything, and you assume that the reason why anyone would post anything is because they want to engage in small talk with you, and for no other reason. I don't think you understand the difference between chat rooms and message boards, or you do, but pretend not to.

The second vision was of the virtual papasmerf, 'physically' in a thread, and spotting bobistheowl across the room, bito's back to him. He calls out to bito, and bito doesn't move. He moves closer, and raises his voice, but there's no reaction. This makes him angry, so he goes over, and knocks bobistheowl's shoulder, and finds out that it's a stuffed dummy of bobistheowl, dressed in bito's costume.

He would not, however, at any time have considered that bobistheowl would always sit with his back to the wall, having learned from the assassination of Wild Bill Hickcock.

After 19,000+ points, you should have figured out the meaning of the green light on your own. Maybe that's the entire problem, but I doubt it.
You make decisions without consulting your brain, perhaps to pre excuse the consequences of your actions, as if you can do anything, because your avatar has sad puppy eyes.

Your motives, however, have little in common with your public persona. You are greedy, papasmerf. You want to have all of the toys, even the ones that don't belong to you. You seem to feel that having the most posts, and the most .png pictures of trophies, somehow makes you the most important person here. Everything is always about you.

For example, several hundred of your posts have indicated some thanks towards me, but not once have you ever clicked the thanks button for any of those posts; that would be giving something, without taking. You consistently make bad decisions, and you butt in, when you're not invited. You interfere when I'm flirting, or you take sides against me, after offering your hand in friendship, when you 'feel' you are right, instead of knowing for sure first.

You say so many things, everywhere, but say so little, save in all but a few. You ignore criticism, in order to remain ignorant of the consequences of the mistakes you want to intentionally make, because you want to keep doing them. That's why you never display any remorse, or haven't yet.

What you're doing is marking territory. You act as if the entire The Lobby belongs to you, and the rest of us are tenants, and the purpose of other people's posts is to give you opportunities to increase your post count.

The problem is, you're a fuck up, plain and simple, who thinks he's king. You don't have to do that, you chose to. You force people to read you, by being impossible to avoid. You follow everyone around like a homeless dog. You're the ad I'm forced to watch before a YouTube video. If there are two dogs in a home, and I'm scratching one dog's ears, you're the other dog who pushes that one aside, because he wants his ears scratched instead.

Just tonight, you post, like five fucking Barenaked Ladies videos in a Punk rock thread? There is no intelligent reason to have done that, whatsoever. Either you are ill informed, or you were acting maliciously. There's no other explanation, but you do that EVERY time.

To me, you are a nuisance, unworthy of my further attention, unless you change your ways, and keep them changed. 'Being good' for five minutes isn't good enough for me. You aren't 2½ years old. You gave me two options, and I chose the one that best suits my enjoyment of this site, not yours.

I think you just like being a saboteur, because you want everything to stay exactly the way things are, perpetually. You know who else thought that? Australopithecus.

Since you refuse to allow me to have threads in which you will not endlessly promote your avatar, while contributing little of substance, the vast majority of the time, I've chosen to read none of your posts, rather that be forced to read many that were misplaced. There's no reason why you need to post small talk everywhere, other than that is the way you mark all of the territory as being your private domain. That doesn't work for me. You take too much, and give too little of value in return.
 
Wow, Bob you must be a novelist or maybe a screen writer in your real life.

Bob, if you don't mind I'd like to give my opinion without any malice of course.

You're taking life and this board much too seriously. PapaS is a pretty decent dude and never really gets into it with anyone. You seem like a good fellow too but are a little bit to sensitive.

Does anyone really care about bacon or cakes. I remember when people were getting riled up over a poster posting pics of cakes...who really cares.

Lighten up, book a sexy lady and get your groove on.
 
Transient is also a very entertaining poster and good guy, I believe you're being a little unfair.
 
oldguyzer, I intensely dislike you, and as of this moment, you have been permanently added to my ignore list. I may, however, look at your posting history, to see whom you have chosen as your next target, and offer that person strategy tips. I just won't interact with oldguyzer personally, ever again.

This is the first post you addressed to me:

oldguyzer said:
More than yourself has been banned from the other boards and ended up here. I don't recall any of whining and justifying our actions on the other board here, though. :blush2:

So, forget them and embrace this board, contribute, and all will be well.

To paraphrase some famous guy: "suck it up, buttercup" :biggrin2:

Right off the bat, you hide your malice behind "shit eating grin #2", for the first time.

On page one of Ask bobistheowl!, without being invited to do so, you started answering my questions, and then said"

oldguyzer said:
Same reason you tell them you have a 5 inch penis. :biggrin2:

Damn, this bobistheowl stuff is kinda fun...wish I had my own thread!

As if to indicate that question and answer threads were your exlusive domain. You didn't take into account, however, that Cardinal Fang advice column predated yours by over a year.

Keep in mind that, on the date I started Ask bobistheowl!, no posts had been made in Ask the Doctor for about 13 days, even though it was a tan sticky. Since no one was coming to your thread, you decided to come into mine, and try to take over, or 'reclaim', as you might put it. You saw competition, and you didn't like it.

You started to heckle me in my own home thread in #67, calling me a "young whippersnapper" for the first of several times, and then "owl boy". Dude, I'm 53 years old. Being called 'boy' is insulting, and you knew that. I might even have been black, for all you knew or cared, you just wanted to impose a pecking order, with yourself on top, which I should accept, because your older.

I saw your motive immediately, and said so:

bobistheowl said:
I understand that you feel threatened by my having diagnosed Anto's mumps without first referring him to a real former doctor. It would probably be a good idea if you sucked that up.

October 19, on page 5, while I was asleep, you started answering my questions, in my thread, without ever even considering that your behavior was unbelievably rude. You had never said a kind word to me, and since have done so less than five times.

Then you say:
oldguyzer said:
Not to hijack owlboy's thread...

which isn't quite what you were doing. You were making my thread your thread, as if that was the 'natural way of things', and importing that 'fixed your post' shit, that only you find funny.

You and papasmerf made the same fuck up, when I was flirting with reverse. I see it as no coincidence that whenever you see an opportunity for self advancement, a mod always appears.

Later you say:
oldguyzer said:
While I realize (and am truly impressed) that you spend two afternoons a week teaching grannies to use a mouse...

Completely ignorant of the fact that one of my students has severe schizophrenia, and must be accompanied to his lessons by a nurse. I wasn't 'stuck with him'. I specifically asked to have him, and he responds well to my teaching style. He's a highly intelligent guy, with problems that were not his fault. What's your excuse?

You then boast of your academic credentials:

oldguyzer said:
Any time you want to compare technical credentials, put your money on the table and be prepared to lose, sonny.

'whippersnapper', 'sonny'? Who the fuck talks like that, expect boring old farts, like you?


oldguyzer said:
Pick the criteria: academic credentials, technical certifications, publications, teaching history, job position, technical knowledge....I let you choose any combination you wish. Otherwise, you're just spouting a lot of hot air.


but you pass on this challenge:

bobistheowl said:
Write something in this thread that a woman will quote, and say "That's funny" as the reply. Game on.

then you accuse me of doing something you did yourself, for the first time:

oldguyzer said:
As I figured...deflect the issue. You shoot your mouth off, then when called on it you get defensive. It's OK, you don't need your mommy to get you out of this mess.

My posting history speaks for itself. Try to read some of it without moving your lips.

I did read your posting history, back about 500 posts, from your profile. Almost 45% of them weren't even posts, they were just uncaptioned images uploaded to the 'Sweet Pussy' and 'Big Breasts' erotic photo threads. When you're not fixing posts, porking around with drivel, and heckling me, that seems to be how you fill your time here. You could have put multiple images in a single post, but that would defeat the purpose of artificially elevating both your post count, and your sense of self worth.

Then you lie about your motive:

oldguyzer said:
...It's simply that, for me, anyone who badmouths ladies in this business and treats them as less than the fine women they are deserves to be treated as the jerk that they are.

As if you are some hero, defending the hypothetical fugly women in the 'bust a slump' post. When Louis XIV was trolling both myself and Jacklyn7 in the BBW thread, however, you claimed him as an ally, because you believe in the Arab proverb "the enemy of my enemy is my friend". To quote from Bob Roberts, "What a Machiavellian poser".

Since then, you've used the same strategy, over and over: provoke, hoping for strong retaliation, so a mod can be your balls, because you knew from that first post I made that you could not compete on equal terms, you had to cheat, and try to have someone else take me out, so your hands would stay dry. When you sense an opportunity, a mod always shows up, and nothing happens. You've cried wolf to many times.

I know exactly what your problem is. You suffer from penis envy, and at your age, it's incurable. You're an old guy with an old mind and money. Your picture is next to "Oppressor" in the Politically Correct handbook, an yet you claim 'victim' status for yourself, because you can't defend your sense of entitlement, without help. You are not strong enough as an individual, so you insinuate yourself into a group in which you don't belong, as if YOU are oppressed, for having too much money. MEN shouldn't behave that way, EVER. Not a man who has a pair, anyway.

Quite frankly, you disgust me, everything about you does. You think that I 'owe you' respect, but you've never offered me any. You'd see that as being weak, and that's one of the reasons you are weak, your sense of entitlement, to more than you deserve.

You are quite possibly the most educated man on this forum, and you've prospered financially, but you possess none of the qualities of a man that money can't buy: Honour, Integrity, Respect from others, which you confuse for deference. You're also the biggest dunce on this forum, for three reasons.

One is your choice of avatar. It's a muppet. I've told you that. In modern 'lingo' muppet means idiot. I've told you that. Why would anyone respect a muppet? I'll give the other two reasons farther down.

You may consider yourself to be formidable, but I don't. This is how I see you:

You're the short guy talking tough, and pointing his finger in my navel, but six feet of toilet paper is stuck to his shoe, and there's been a Kotex pad stuck to the back of his sports coat for a week, and he hasn't noticed yet.

You're the guy who phones the police to report an assault in progress, puts on a pair of glasses, and goes out to pick a fight.

You're the guy who packs an outfit of ladies clothing and a grey wig in his suitcase before going on a cruise liner, in case the ship is sinking, and there aren't enough life boats for everyone.

You're the guy in the safari shorts, with legs the same colour as the skin of a cadaver, wearing black socks, cheap running shoes, and a T-shirt with the slogan "I heart beany babies".

You're a California Raisin.

You're a Pet'aQ, Kingon for "one who has no honour", but you're not a Klingon. You're a Ferengi Pet'aQ.

You're the guy who fucks with his socks on, because he doesn't want to remove the straps that hold them up, twice in the same day. For your shower, you'd put plastic bags with elastic tops around your feet and shins.

You're Newman, from Seinfeld, all old and wrinkled.

You're a fossil, still living in 1974.

You're a wannabe bully.

You're Elmer Fudd.

Find another bird to carry you across the river, because I know you're a scorpion.


As for the specific performance contract, to which we are bound, I would never accept money from your hand. I wouldn't know where it had been. I will, however, allow you to send that money to HUBGFE, on behalf of the Escort who confirms my prowess, for the purpose of prepaying her advertising bill, or you can welch. That part of it is no longer my concern.

So here are the other two reasons why you're the biggest dunce here. Whenever I hand you your ass in response to one of your attacks, you quote my diss, in full, so people who missed it will see it, and people who saw it, will see it again. When a guy gets owned by himself like that in my neighbourhood, he gets a new nickname, for life, and he doesn't chose it himself.

The other reason is even bigger: You just read this entire post, even though I told you in the first sentence that you were already on Ignore, and would have no opportunity to have your reply, if any, displayed on my monitor. And you can't say you didn't do that, without confirming that you did.

What a muppet.

I believe that's checkmate.

The terms of your redemption, and the necessary penance, follow immediately below.
 
oldguyzer's penance:

1) You're to remove the designated post #413 from Ask bobistheowl!, if papasmerf asks you to.

2) You're to change your handle, permanently, and change your attitude, permanently, as well.

3) You're to adopt each of these five avatars for one week each:







If you do as commanded, I will give you a clean slate, take you off Ignore, and we can start fresh.

I'm actually hoping you won't comply, because I really don't want to keep my part of the bargain.

One more thing: Your Christmas present:



N C Wyeth art print, book illustration from Treasure Island. In this low resolution image, it looks like that might be an owl, with a hook on his left wing, sitting on Long John Silver's shoulder.

Enlarged:



It's a parrot, and the butt of Silver's musket.

The caption for this illustration is:

"For all the world, I was led like a dancing bear"

 
To Louis XIV:

I made a clean bust on you, when you posted the Todd Brooker ski crash video. You should have given me proper respect for that. You did initially, then you decided to be a Troll, and you decided to Troll Jacklyn7, for no reason whatsoever.

You've been good of late, and you're pretty funny some times, so I'm giving you a pardon. You probably don't want to heckle me, and don't EVER heckle a woman on this board again, or I'll be displeased.

I will recognize what you say, until such time as you give me another reason not to.
 
Leo said:
How do you find time to put this together, plus your other posts. You a retired rich guy or a poor man living off the government?.

I work from home, and I rarely sleep, Leo.
 
Dan said:
Transient is also a very entertaining poster and good guy, I believe you're being a little unfair.

Dan, I respect your opinion.

I've identified the following posts from the TV Trivia thread as necessary housecleaning:


#19, #23, #24, #30, #38, #39, #40, #41, #51, #54, #56, #58, #59, #60, #67, #68, #69, #70, #71, #72, #73, #74, #75, #76, #78, #79, #80, #83, #100, #112, #113, #126, #128, #159, #160, #162, #214, #228, #247, #251, #252, #253, #255, #257, #259, #260, #261, #262, #267, #268, #269, #270, #271, #272, #273, #274, #280, #281, #282, #284, #285, #286, #287, #288, #289, #290, #292, #294, #295, #296, #297, #298, #299, #300, #301, #302, #303, #304, #305, #306, #307, #313, #314

A few of them are my own.

If the perpetrators will remove all of their posts, and deposit them elsewhere, (this was the intention of the Richard Simmons has aids thread). I'll give Transient a clean slate, and every opportunity to prove my assessment to be inaccurate.

I'll pardon papasmerf, as well, and reinstate him from Ignore, with his avatar unchanged, if he, and all of them, will agree to refrain from posting small talk in my serious threads, from now on. That 'I'll be good for five minutes' shit isn't good enough. They don't have to do that everywhere, but they do, because they can. It's selfish, and not fun for everyone else.

They can do that anywhere else, except another member's serious thread, and I will join in, sometimes. People can read a thread without posting to say they've read it. They take those trophies and awards too seriously.

The sanctions against oldguyzer will stand. He'll have to change his handle, adopt the new avatars for one week each, and become a different character. He can keep his precious post counts and trophies.

The pork shit is holding this site back. Six people are dictating, and 1,000 are saying "whatever". If they're too stubborn to budge, so am I. As the snakehead of pork, papasmerf can pay for their crimes.

I'm not trying to impose my will on this board, I'm just not willing to allow them to impose their will on me.

It would be nice if we retained many of the red board visitors who came by today. If we lose them, I'm likely to lose interest in this place, as well, and what happens after that would not concern me. Too much of this forum is a joke, and not a funny one.
 
Dan said:
Wow, Bob you must be a novelist or maybe a screen writer in your real life.

Bob, if you don't mind I'd like to give my opinion without any malice of course.

You're taking life and this board much too seriously. PapaS is a pretty decent dude and never really gets into it with anyone. You seem like a good fellow too but are a little bit to sensitive.

Does anyone really care about bacon or cakes. I remember when people were getting riled up over a poster posting pics of cakes...who really cares.

Lighten up, book a sexy lady and get your groove on.

Dan, I will be starting to write a screenplay in January. I really just need to write it down; I have 90% of it in my head, just not on paper. I rarely read novels. My forte is character dialogue. I've just been neglecting my serious work to write free stuff here.

I've been holding off until I finish the computer font I've been working on. I actually write a lot of these long pieces typing with one or two fingers, while I'm having a smoke.

As you can tell, I can compose quickly, if I know what I'm going to say. I can also work 18 hours a day, when properly motivated.

I'm saving the funny stuff for the movie; this is warm up. I needed to do the font first, because it will generate hobby money, while I'm doing the writing.

I don't take things too seriously, they don't take things seriously enough. I treat disrespect with disrespect, but I do it better. That's my fun.

papasmerf can't be extending his hand in friendship, taking sides against me, and expect me to laugh it off, all at the same time. He doesn't enrich my life enough to get all three, and give next to nothing in return. He needs to change.
 
Bob

Friendship does not come with conditions.

We meet people and accept them.
Along the way we know them better and in that knowledge they know us.

You keep making demands and threaten to with hold love if they are not met.
Conditional love and or friendship is actually nothing at all.

Lighten up and I assure you everyone else will too.
 
Back
Top Bottom