Made with Love

Fish Toxin Fear Put in Perspective

Maurice Boscorelli

Senior Member
Joined
May 30, 2010
Messages
19,322
Excerpted from by Dr. Jonny Bowden and Jeannette Bessinger, the Clean Food Coach™. Find out more at [url]www.thecleanfoodcoach.com[/URL]
The main concern most people have with fish is mercury, which is understandable because since it’s one of the most potent toxins on the planet. But you probably don’t have to fear it as much as you think.
First let’s be honest: Nearly all fish and shellfish contain slight traces of mercury. But for most people the risk from that trace amount is not a health concern. In fact a large study of more than 173,000 men and women found that mercury exposure from eating fish does not increase heart-related problems. In the study, researchers found that people who reported eating the most fish did indeed showed somewhat higher levels of mercury but they didn’t have any increase whatsoever in heart disease or stroke. In fact, those with the highest concentration of mercury actually had a 15 percent% lower risk of heart disease compared to those with the lowest concentrations.
The reason for that surprising finding has to do with cost-benefit analysis. Those in the study with the higher levels of mercury were also those who ate the most fish, and those who ate the most fish were also consuming the most omega-3 fats (which are found primarily in cold water fish like salmon). Apparently the enormous benefit of increased consumption of omega-3 fats outweighs the risk involved in ingesting a slight amount of mercury from fish.
“”I think this really shuts the door on the worry about heart risk or toxicity to the heart at these exposure levels,”” said the lead author of the study, Dariush Mozaffarian, M.D., a heart expert at the Harvard School of Public Health. “”And that’s that’s an important message, because there may be a lot of adults who are at risk of heart disease who may be confused or concerned about eating fish, or are shying away from fish because of their concerns about mercury. Our study suggests they don’t need to worry about heart risks.”


Now I’m no mercury apologist. I think we should avoid it like the plague. But avoiding fish because of the possibility of ingesting a very small amount of mercury has some pretty steep costs. Nutrients such as omega-3 fatty acids, iodine, iron, and choline, present in fish like wild salmon, shrimp, Pollock, cod, canned light tuna, and even catfish, are vital to brain development. Researchers found that these nutrients may even lessen the effects of dyslexia, autism, hyperactivity, and attention deficit disorder.
Scientific findings presented at a conference sponsored by the governments of the United States, Norway, Canada, and Iceland and assisted by the United Nations’ Food and Agricultural Organization, supported the notion that all Americans,- especially pregnant and nursing women and children,— should eat seafood twice a week despite the current concerns about pollution contamination. The American Heart Association recommends that we eat at least two fish meals a week. This recommendation is included in the USDA’s dietary guidelines as well. The nutrients found in seafood help reduce the risk of death by heart attack and prevent a host of chronic health problems.
And while we’re on the subject of fish, let’s talk specifically about salmon, one of our favorite fish and one that figures prominently in several many of the recipes in this book.
Salmon, as you may know, is one of the best sources in the world for omega-3 fatty acids. These fats – which have been called “wellness molecules” by Andrew Storr, M.D. of Harvard Medical School, —are helpful for heart health and brain health. They lower triglycerides and blood pressure and even improve mood.
So we love salmon
But the problem is that salmon has become so darn popular that it’s now a commodity. Salmon are now routinely raised on what are called “salmon farms,” , where thousands of them are crowded into small areas called “net pens,”, with very serious consequences for both the fish and the surrounding waters. Salmon farms pack the salmons in like sardines, which obviously makes the spreading of disease a virtual certainty. So the salmon farmers do exactly what the factory farmers do with their cattle—- they feed them massive amounts of antibiotics.
They also feed them grain. Now salmon in the wild are natural carnivores, dining happily on such fare as sardines, krill, mackerel, and other fish. They don’t thrive on grain any more than factory- farmed cows do. And because of their heavy grain diet, their fat has a higher proportion of pro-inflammatory fats like omega-6’s. What’s more, according to independent lab tests by the non-profit Environmental Working Group, seven out of ten farmed salmon purchased at grocery stores were contaminated with PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls) at levels that raise some serious concerns.
Wild salmon, on the other hand, are a whole different story. They get their natural red color not from artificial colorings (the way farmed salmon often do) but from a fantastic antioxidant called astaxanthin, which is naturally found in the krill they like to eat. They aren’t pumped full of antibiotics and they have low levels of omega-6 fats. All in all, wild salmon are the way to go and it’s the reason we feel so strongly that you should try to get wild whenever possible.









This is all getting pretty confusing.
 
Excerpted from by Dr. Jonny Bowden and Jeannette Bessinger, the Clean Food Coach™. Find out more at www.thecleanfoodcoach.com
...



This is all getting pretty confusing.

I eat wild salmon every day and just finished eating some before reading this thread. :good:

Anyone know why we can get canned salmon, tuna, sardines, etc. but no canned rainbow trout? Are they not as plentiful?
 
I eat wild salmon every day and just finished eating some before reading this thread. :good:

Anyone know why we can get canned salmon, tuna, sardines, etc. but no canned rainbow trout? Are they not as plentiful?

Even I do not know, imagine that :unknw:
 
After Japans Earthquake...sorry No Wild Fish For me.....There is only so much the Ocean can take....
and the creatures in the Oceans....
 
I read this the other day:

Ocean Garbage Patch Is Mysteriously Disappearing

A vast amount of the plastic garbage littering the surface of the ocean may be disappearing, a new study suggests.

Exactly what is happening to this ocean debris is a mystery, though the researchers hypothesize that the trash could be breaking down into tiny, undetectable pieces. Alternatively, the garbage may be traveling deep into the ocean's interior.

The modern period has been dubbed the Plastic Age. As society produces more and more of the material, storm water runoff carries more and more of the detritus of modern life into the ocean. Ocean currents, acting as giant conveyer belts, then carry the plastic into several subtropical regions, such as the infamous Pacific Ocean Garbage Patch.

Cózar and his colleagues wanted to understand the size and extent of the ocean's garbage problem. The researchers circumnavigated the globe in a ship called the Malaspina in 2010, collecting surface water samples and measuring plastic concentrations. The team also analyzed data from several other expeditions, looking at a total of 3,070 samples.

What they found was strange. Despite the drastic increase in plastic produced since the 1970s, the researchers estimated there were between 7,000 and 35,000 tons of plastic in the oceans. Based on crude calculations, there should have been millions of tons of garbage in the oceans.

Because each large piece of plastic can break down into many additional, smaller pieces of plastic, the researchers expected to find more tiny pieces of debris. But the vast majority of the small plastic pieces, measuring less than 0.2 inches (5 millimeters) in size, were missing, Cózar said.

... small fish — particularly lanternfishes — may be eating some of these small plastic pieces, dubbed microplastics, and breaking them down even more. Because small fish are the ecological link between plankton and small vertebrates, and because commercial fish such as swordfish and tuna eat these small fish, it's important to understand whether the absorption of toxins from the plastic will impact these animals' health, he said.

The findings were published today (June 30) in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

https://news.yahoo.com/ocean-garbag...zcgRwb3MDNwRjb2xvA2dxMQR2dGlkA01TWUNBQzFfMQ--
 
Who advises these authors on the meanings of words?

Mercury is not a toxin. It is not produced within a cell or by biological means.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toxin

mercury is a poison.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercury_poisoning

Apart form that, I agree with the authors that sometimes we are extremely anal about pollutants and their effects on the human body.

You can eat Salmon once a week it won't hurt you. Those that eat it 2-3 times a day will suffer in the long run.
 
You can eat Salmon once a week it won't hurt you. Those that eat it 2-3 times a day will suffer in the long run.


Why do you think that? I would think you are better off eating salmon than steak although admittedly I do enjoy a good Keg steak every now and then.
 
Why do you think that? I would think you are better off eating salmon than steak although admittedly I do enjoy a good Keg steak every now and then.

Because of the high level of mercury.



Next question?.
 
Back
Top Bottom