That is what the lady is doing. Lisa's first paragraph says it all. The owner did not say here keep it, did she?. No she said "to look after the dog while she was gone"
my daughter was given a dog to look after while the owner; a young pregnant lady who was homeless went to a womans shelter for the duration of her pregnancy
The wording is key in a situation like this.....was the daughter given the dog? or was the daughter given the dog to look after?
i just had a brainstorm: maybe i should tell her to pay me for the 7 months i been looking after him
That is a MOST excellant idea. Although legally one could argue both sides: was compensation ever discussed? Even if it wasn't specifically brought up common sense would dictate that some sort of renumeration for care would be forthcoming. I mean, how much would it have cost to board the dog at a kennel? I think I heard somewhere that it is about $100.00 per week or something like that.
When the police call (and they will if she does in fact contact them) you have to decide how you're going to play this: compassion for the dog being neglected if returned to the owner? or Compensation for the care and comfort for the past 3 months. I don't think you could play it both ways....
If I were you I'd play it that you don't think the dog would be well cared for if returned. I mean, the owner has a history of such correct? Now on top of her troubles she has a baby to look after and since she couldn't look after herself and the dog, what's to say that she can look after herself, a baby AND a dog now?
Anyhow, keep us posted, I'm curious as to what the police will say, if in fact they are contacted.....