Perla vs Flirt Court Decision

[ERecTile]

https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onscdc...Hash=AAAAAQAIQm9keSBydWIAAAAAAQ&resultIndex=1

For those who are interested. I heard this got posted on the red board and was taken down within an hour. I can't confirm that since I don't go there anymore, but I'll put the link here.

Basically in a nut shell, when Flirt moved into the same Plaza as Perla, it ruffled a lot of feathers. Premier management took their case to court. The initial battle seemed like it was won. Flirt was given 1 year to vacate the Plaza. Flirt appealed the decision and looks like they may have won the decisive victory and now Premier management is on the hook for $50,000 in court costs.

I don't understand why this would be deleted on the red board. Premier doesn't even pay for advertising there, while Flirt does. And when the post about Flirt losing the first battle came out, that thread stayed on for a long time. Clearly there is some form of favoritism at play. Hell, all this stuff is public information. Like when Perla got suspended for week in 2015. Anyone can find this stuff pretty easily so why the censorship?

 

[Fuggedabouditt]

Because RED sucks donkey balls and are a bunch of fucking idiots.

 

[ERecTile]

I'm curious to how that board works behind the scenes. Premier must hold a lot of power there. Either in the former of shills and Knights or some other means. I do feel bad for Flirt. As a paid advertiser they have to sit back and watch as their closest competitor who does NOT pay for advertising get preferential treatment and what amounts to free advertising.

 

[Fuggedabouditt]

I'm curious to how that board works behind the scenes. Premier must hold a lot of power there. Either in the former of shills and Knights or some other means. I do feel bad for Flirt. As a paid advertiser they have to sit back and watch as their closest competitor who does NOT pay for advertising get preferential treatment and what amounts to free advertising.

Doesn't seem fair, does it?

To accuse RED of shills and Knights isn't new. They are an owner run board and it's no secret. I was banned because I called out an agency owner and a few of their high posters. I do the same here and I get a PM from a Mod. Telling, don't you think?

In fact, there is a thread going on there right now that I'm dying to put in my two cents to the fucking asshole white Knight but I can't post. He's a poster here but is largely inactive these days. Come out come out wherever you are asshole

 

[ERecTile]

I was talking to a friend of mine who still goes there. Apparently the massage section is a mess. Same recycled reviews, and where they used to take a hard stance regarding posts of extras in MPs, lately there has been a lot of breaking of that rule, and yet a post that puts Premier is a bad light is deleted in an hour. It's quite obvious Premier has mod(s) in their pocket.

 

[ERecTile]

Thank you mods for moving this to the lobby.

 

[50cents]

Thank you mods for moving this to the lobby.

+ 1

 

[draculio]

Can someone explain what the red board is and what the blue board is, newbie question I guess.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Anto]

Can someone explain what the red board is and what the blue board is, newbie question I guess.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Other review sites but you want to avoid the blue one. Do not register there as the owner will blackmail you with your personal information.

There are also many review sites out West.

 

[draculio]

Is it another name for a board like t*** or it's actually called the red board?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[User-P]

Is it another name for a board like **** or it's actually called the red board?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

.

Red board usually refers to review board t***. Blue board in Ont. usually means S****.

The other red board is L*** a recommendation board, not a review board.

Green board in Quebec is m***, big blue board in BC is p*** , blue board in AB is C**, often referred to as 'the baby cow' board.



HUBGFE policy is to not promote our direct competitors, so we ask that you don't post names of other boards, or links to other review boards.

 

[User-P]

HUBGFE policy is to not promote our direct competitors, so we ask that you don't post names of other boards, or links to other review boards.

.

Just thought I'd mention in case any of our advertisers are reading this thread, when you tag us @HUBGFEreviews in your tweets for us to RT them, please don't tag our competitors in the same tweet because we aren't interested in promoting their business along with yours.



Don't let my posts stop the discussion - please continue ...

 

[ERecTile]

Personally I like that there's two Tier 1 places in one Plaza. Competition will make both places stronger. Besides, they tend differ in terms of service mileage. It's good to know that if I wanted an old fashioned erotic massage, I'll head to Flirt. And if I want something more "exotic" I'll head to Perla. The whole court case was frivolous from the get go and it was all because of some hurt feelings.

 

[evh]

https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onscdc...Hash=AAAAAQAIQm9keSBydWIAAAAAAQ&resultIndex=1

For those who are interested. I heard this got posted on the red board and was taken down within an hour. I can't confirm that since I don't go there anymore, but I'll put the link here.

Basically in a nut shell, when Flirt moved into the same Plaza as Perla, it ruffled a lot of feathers. Premier management took their case to court. The initial battle seemed like it was won. Flirt was given 1 year to vacate the Plaza. Flirt appealed the decision and looks like they may have won the decisive victory and now Premier management is on the hook for $50,000 in court costs.

I don't understand why this would be deleted on the red board. Premier doesn't even pay for advertising there, while Flirt does. And when the post about Flirt losing the first battle came out, that thread stayed on for a long time. Clearly there is some form of favoritism at play. Hell, all this stuff is public information. Like when Perla got suspended for week in 2015. Anyone can find this stuff pretty easily so why the censorship?

Good for Flirt. It would set an awful precedent if competing businesses could be sued for opening close to each other.

 

[Fuggedabouditt]

I had a very specific market in a past business. I spoke to the owners and had them put in a clause that they would not lease out another unit in the complex to the same and or like type of business as long as I was occupying my unit. They agreed. I did the same when I had to expand a couple of years later to a larger unit that was more in the core of the city. The owners also agreed.

 

[evh]

I had a very specific market in a past business. I spoke to the owners and had them put in a clause that they would not lease out another unit in the complex to the same and or like type of business as long as I was occupying my unit. They agreed. I did the same when I had to expand a couple of years later to a larger unit that was more in the core of the city. The owners also agreed.

If that happened with Perla shouldn't the case be between Perla and the landlord?

If it was in writing wouldn't that be a slam dunk?

I tried reading that stuff and all I could figure out was there was some debate on "front" and that Perla had to pay court costs to the city and Flirt.

I don't get it. Premier is always busy, the opening of Flirt had no direct effect. But now it looks like the opening of Flirt cost Perla 50K.

 

[Thomas Crown]

You should never negotiate a lease with out a exclusivity clause. whoever did their lease should have checked that

 

[ERecTile]

If that happened with Perla shouldn't the case be between Perla and the landlord?

If it was in writing wouldn't that be a slam dunk?

I tried reading that stuff and all I could figure out was there was some debate on "front" and that Perla had to pay court costs to the city and Flirt.

I don't get it. Premier is always busy, the opening of Flirt had no direct effect. But now it looks like the opening of Flirt cost Perla 50K.

Apparently, Perla tried to sue Flirt on a very small technicality. Basically that a body rub could not "front" on to Victoria Park. As we know, the door to Flirt technically faces Sparks, but since it occupies the corner suite of the building, it also technically faces VP, which is how Perla won the first decision. Like I said, the whole thing was frivolous and driven by hurt feelings. As for the 50k, they can make that back in a few days.

 

[evh]

Apparently, Perla tried to sue Flirt on a very small technicality. Basically that a body rub could not "front" on to Victoria Park. As we know, the door to Flirt technically faces Sparks, but since it occupies the corner suite of the building, it also technically faces VP, which is how Perla won the first decision. Like I said, the whole thing was frivolous and driven by hurt feelings. As for the 50k, they can make that back in a few days.

sure but they are still 50 k behind of where they could have been without the lawsuit.

if they have that kind of cash to burn why not some promos to show customer appreciation. i have dropped several thousands there.

 

[ERecTile]

I think Premier has a standing policy to not spend money on promos or advertising. They literally don't need to now that they've established a name for themselves as the place to go to get what guys want. The 50k was probably viewed as a gamble. If they could knock out their biggest competitor and make Flirt lose the tons of money they invested in their spa, then it's a cheap victory. As it is, it's bitter pill for them to swallow but they will recover.