Made with Love

Renewed Jarvis bike lane debate shifts to high gear

She said it would be the equivalent of pulling out a road for car drivers or a sidewalk for pedestrians.

SHows you just how stupid some people are, what does she think they did by putting the lane IN in the first place? They certainly didn't ADD a fucking road for a car......

I'd also like to meet the people who did the study on "it takes a few minutes" longer for cars. I'd add that 2 minutes per car x 500 cars = 1000 minutes or 16.6 hrs. Now how does adding 16.6 hrs of traffic help the city be "green"? Now you could actually multiply that number by the increase in idling time which is 100% inefficient.

(that 500 is a rough estimate, figure a car drives in the lane every 2 seconds, or 30 a minute, or 180 an hour, x 4 hrs for rush hour per day)

I'm all for bike lanes, but not at the cost of vehicular traffic. Especially since they are only going to be used for a few months per year.....
 
What did you except from a pantie waste like Miller? That dick had more stupid ideas than Mr. Bean and waged war on the car. I am so glad white head is gone.
 
Insertion said:
What did you except from a pantie waste like Miller? That dick had more stupid ideas than Mr. Bean and waged war on the car. I am so glad white head is gone.


I knew toronto was in trouble with that bonehead when he got elected, and the first thing he did was freeze all the wages of city employees, then gave himself a nice salary increase.......
 
tboy said:
I knew toronto was in trouble with that bonehead when he got elected, and the first thing he did was freeze all the wages of city employees, then gave himself a nice salary increase.......

But he did bring The Rolling Stones to TO :beurk:
 
Back
Top Bottom