Madman
Reviewer
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2011
- Messages
- 17,534
Most of the ladies out east using real legal name screening are usually fairly professional. You don't see them complaining about clients, putting down other people's cities, posting prospects text messages in their Twitter feeds.
I'm open to the idea if the escort is operating professionally. My review board handle and legal name will never mix.
20 something Escorts behaving unprofessionally posting client and prospect communications while acting like 14 year olds, not a chance.
In Austriallia real name screening the U.K., real name screening is the standard. All of the providers in those counties are operating at higher standard of professionalism which gives the clients confidence they can share their real names and sleep at night.
We have providers in Canada operating with similar standards. The challenge is we have a lot of providers claiming to be professional but acting unprofessionally.
In Britian and Australia the communities hold people accountable to behaving professionally. Both clients and SP are expected to behave professionally.
The ladies of twitter that rant is such a marketing disaster it's ridiculous to watch and I totally agree I would never give my real name. My handle, a reference possibly until SP places a condition on the reference i.e.
"the client must have spent a minimum of 6 hours with said SP"
Really, give me a break. Talk about putting a kabosh on your screening method.
As a client, why not just call an agency and if you're a board member in good standing you have no issues with booking through an agency.
I also agree with Fugged criminalization of any kind is a major hindrance to everyone's safety and for me losing my job and family is death so I do agree in today's climate my safety depends on my anonymity.
In the US, the disclosure of client's name is to prove they are not LE, in Canada LE is a danger to the client more so than the SP in today's state of laws.