SP's who do or have done porn

[Fuggedabouditt]

There are few SP's who have done porn. I've noticed that it is unprotected sex which follows the health and safety criteria set out by the industry.

My question is, if a client follows that same criteria and the SP also follows, is unprotected sex an option.

Current SP's in porn

 

[cristycurves]

Isn't that like saying you're a little pregnant? Unprotected sex is dangerous sex, imo, so I'm confused to know how it could meet health and safety criteria.

 

[User-E]

Have you ever made porn Fugg?

 

[Fuggedabouditt]

Isn't that like saying you're a little pregnant? Unprotected sex is dangerous sex, imo, so I'm confused to know how it could meet health and safety criteria.

The porn industry sets standards for its actors.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adult_film_industry_regulations
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adult_Industry_Medical_Health_Care_Foundation

Of course any unprotected sex, oral, vaginal or anal is dangerous and risky. Things happen between two consenting adults, but with following the same criteria in the porn industry, would this be an option for SP's.

In particular, if SP's get checked as often as they say, they should be "fine". I get checked probably as often as SP's because I'm a bit prolific.

Have you ever made porn Fugg?

A couple private collections.

 

[Goodfella]

Hmmmmmm

 

[User-E]

A couple private collections.

Any particular genre, or just generic porn. :wink2:

 

[peace]

Any particular genre, or just generic porn. :wink2:

I thin k many of his collections include trees:good:

 

[JunoxGrey]

I'm good friends with 3/4, and no it is not an option. Performing in porn on both parts isn't for pleasure it is just that a performance and one that both parties must go through vigorous testing. On the same scale just because someone has unprotected intercourse with their partner doesn't mean they're willing with someone else

 

[Jasper]

If we wanted to loaded questions, we could ask the same of everyone - not just those in porn.

Do they have unprotected sex with their partner? Hmmmmmm

 

[What A Wookie]

There's professional liability/accountability in porn for the involved parties. Even so there have been several large breaches in the testing protocol that shut down production in porn valley. Irresponsible Performers hid their test results in order to keep working resulting in outbreaks.

Even with all the regulations there's no fool proof system.

 

[Fuggedabouditt]

I'm good friends with 3/4, and no it is not an option. Performing in porn on both parts isn't for pleasure it is just that a performance and one that both parties must go through vigorous testing. On the same scale just because someone has unprotected intercourse with their partner doesn't mean they're willing with someone else

So the other question is, what's the difference?

If an SP and client choose to have unprotected sex, and they go through the testing beforehand, isn't that more responsible than just "doing it"?

What about if the SP has an SO? Does the SO go through rigorous testing because his/her partner is in a high risk occupation?

In my decades of hobbying, I've had unprotected sex with a handful of SP's. It happens and it's usually with someone I've been committed to seeing exclusively. She, on the other hand, has a business to run and cannot be exclusive unless we have an arrangement; which I could not accommodate. Being somewhat irresponsibly responsible, I would sync up with the SP to let her know I was getting tested and she should as well but as we all know and commented here, nothing is fool proof. I've kind of given up losing sleep and worrying about being uber sensitive and careful. We all know the risks and we take the precautions we can. I'm not going to lose sleep over it as some have "OH MY GOD, MY PENIS ACCIDENTALLY RUBBED UP AGAINST HER....i'M DOOMED..." or the guy who asks for CBJ and wears latex gloves....yeah, you know who I'm talking about....


When I watch porn, I immediately click off the movies or scenes where the male is wearing a condom. It just doesn't excite me. California has passed a law that all porn movies made in Cali. are to have the actors practice safe sex, male condoms or female condoms, hence the move out to Florida and other parts of the country to make movies. The only porn company that follows this rule is Vivid, I don't watch their videos and I rarely see them on PornHub.

I'd still like to hear from active SP's who are in to the porn industry.

 

[Fuggedabouditt]

Any particular genre, or just generic porn. :wink2:

Generic, BDSM, edging/denial.

I thin k many of his collections include trees:good:

No, just your mother and sister.

 

[c]

Hello, love. Glad you could list me in what seems like an altogether very unpleasant category.

I should let you and anyone who expects these services that unlike the one person I've filmed with, that they aren't professional tested porn performers.

You have in the past claimed to be a client of mine so I assume you should know that I have my own health boundaries and what I partake in with a well regarded professional film company with professional testing service is no where near the same as a casual encounter. A little questionable that you would question my service boundaries while also claiming to have been a previous client.

You should probably ask yourself before posting slander if you're an established porn performer who's been tested explicitly through TalentTesting which posts results online and is the mandatory company to work through in porn? (Hence why faking papers is so difficult unless you're working with a cheap/shoddy company)
Because multiple performers are escorts on the side and do not emulate the exact same services as shown on video for obvious reasons.

Bless.
xo

 

[c]

Especially considering the one and only film I was in was with a company that wasn't even Canadian.
Really the incredibly obvious difference should be stifling.
Do you assume Elsa Jean, London James, Arabelle Raphael and the other multitude of porn stars who escort also partake in the same services as they do?

The answer is undoubtedly a no.

 

[peace]

Generic, BDSM, edging/denial.



No, just your mother and sister.

:no::no:

 

[Fuggedabouditt]

Hello, love. Glad you could list me in what seems like an altogether very unpleasant category.

I should let you and anyone who expects these services that unlike the one person I've filmed with, that they aren't professional tested porn performers.

You have in the past claimed to be a client of mine so I assume you should know that I have my own health boundaries and what I partake in with a well regarded professional film company with professional testing service is no where near the same as a casual encounter. A little questionable that you would question my service boundaries while also claiming to have been a previous client.

You should probably ask yourself before posting slander if you're an established porn performer?
Because multiple performers are escorts on the side and do not emulate the exact same services as shown on video for obvious reasons.

Bless.
xo

Especially considering the one and only film I was in was with a company that wasn't even Canadian.
Really the incredibly obvious difference should be stifling.
Do you assume Elsa Jean, London James, Arabelle Raphael and the other multitude of porn stars who escort also partake in the same services as they do?

The answer is undoubtedly a no.

It is an unpleasant subject matter but something that some have wondered but don't have the courage to ask.

I did not question your health boundaries, I used you as an example having seen the video that you made also the other SP's that I listed. The only question was if this was a consideration IF the same measures were taken with the performer and the lady, would this be an option for a client.

I'm not a professional performer. The question was answered with my being in a private collection and not distributed to my knowledge. The videos were taken with an S.O. and at her request, she was/is also an active SP.

 

[c]

It is an unpleasant subject matter but something that some have wondered but don't have the courage to ask.

I did not question your health boundaries, I used you as an example having seen the video that you made also the other SP's that I listed. The only question was if this was a consideration IF the same measures were taken with the performer and the lady, would this be an option for a client.

I'm not a professional performer. The question was answered with my being in a private collection and not distributed to my knowledge. The videos were taken with an S.O. and at her request, she was/is also an active SP.

That's fair, but I feel like if this was a general question, you shouldn't have listed people by name.
I've told anyone who's ever asked me in the past that it's a very stern no. I was very tentative to even take on the video in question until I had complete safety and reassurance. I don't feel like anyone could provide me with what legal documentation, testing, company reputation, and a lot of release forms and assurance could do.
I'm really off put that a single porn from almost a year ago is bringing these questions up when I've said time and time again it's not something within my comfort level.
I understand that maybe you've not seen my past discomfort in this topic being raised, but I'm just informing you that it's something that is a stressor for me.
I don't mean to be aggressive, it's very sensitive for me as people have harassed me in the past about this and it's not something for me.
It's a service I do not offer and do not want to be associated with.

 

[Fuggedabouditt]

@CamillaLushXO - To add, I believe I'm aware of ALL SP's health and safety boundaries. I think they are common across the industry. Those who practice otherwise are normally short lived. I don't believe I have ever been disrespectful to your boundaries in any way shape or form.

 

[Fuggedabouditt]

That's fair, but I feel like if this was a general question, you shouldn't have listed people by name.
I've told anyone who's ever asked me in the past that it's a very stern no. I was very tentative to even take on the video in question until I had complete safety and reassurance. I don't feel like anyone could provide me with what legal documentation, testing, company reputation, and a lot of release forms and assurance could do.
I'm really off put that a single porn from almost a year ago is bringing these questions up when I've said time and time again it's not something within my comfort level.
I understand that maybe you've not seen me past discomfort in this topic being raised, but I'm just informing you that it's something that is a stressor for me.
It's a service I do not offer and do not want to be associated with.

To admit that I didn't have an agenda would be an untruth. I listed your name to get your feedback. Not to suggest you offer these services. Truth and honesty in these types of taboo questions are what I'm looking for and perhaps the masses. I don't speak for them but I am curious to hear opinions.

My apologies if I've offended you but it was not my intention to suggest you would offer this service. BUT I will say, that if I was a professional, I would have been first in line to perform in that video with you.

 

[Jane Way]

Hello, love. Glad you could list me in what seems like an altogether very unpleasant category.

I should let you and anyone who expects these services that unlike the one person I've filmed with, that they aren't professional tested porn performers.

You have in the past claimed to be a client of mine so I assume you should know that I have my own health boundaries and what I partake in with a well regarded professional film company with professional testing service is no where near the same as a casual encounter. A little questionable that you would question my service boundaries while also claiming to have been a previous client.

You should probably ask yourself before posting slander if you're an established porn performer who's been tested explicitly through TalentTesting which posts results online and is the mandatory company to work through in porn? (Hence why faking papers is so difficult unless you're working with a cheap/shoddy company)
Because multiple performers are escorts on the side and do not emulate the exact same services as shown on video for obvious reasons.

Bless.
xo

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I do not offer BBFS, I also haven't performed in bareback porn to this date, so I, too, am confused as to why I'm being brought up in this. If you have questions about my industries, you could have asked us instead of creating a toxic atmosphere questioning our professionalism and safety standards.

Also worth noting, Rebecca Winter has also never done porn without a condom, either. There are condom-only performers, but even if someone does bareback porn, the industry standards are so rigorous, it's much more complicated than just having a clean test, as Camilla has said. And there's no crossover between a client encounter and an encounter on set. It's two completely different scenarios.

You clearly have a lot of misinformation about both industries as a whole, also threads like this naming names with no thought out research put into it, can perpetuate aggressive and demanding boundary crossers to expect services that were never offered in the first place. I think I can speak for most all of us when I saw that no, it's not the same, and you're not getting bareback.