SP's who do or have done porn

[Fuggedabouditt]

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I do not offer BBFS, I also haven't performed in bareback porn to this date, so I, too, am confused as to why I'm being brought up in this. If you have questions about my industries, you could have asked us instead of creating a toxic atmosphere questioning our professionalism and safety standards.

Also worth noting, Rebecca Winter has also never done porn without a condom, either. There are condom-only performers, but even if someone does bareback porn, the industry standards are so rigorous, it's much more complicated than just having a clean test, as Camilla has said. And there's no crossover between a client encounter and an encounter on set. It's two completely different scenarios.

You clearly have a lot of misinformation about both industries as a whole, also threads like this naming names with no thought out research put into it, can perpetuate aggressive and demanding boundary crossers to expect services that were never offered in the first place. I think I can speak for most all of us when I saw that no, it's not the same, and you're not getting bareback.

Where did I say specifically that I would like you offer BBFS?

I said, if the client goes through the rigors of testing as porn actors do, would they be okay to have unprotected sex as some of the porn I've seen. There is a thin line there, but there IS a line.

To say that I've seen you perform bare porn would be a lie, because I haven't purchased your videos but have seen some of the previews which don't lead to much except a few moments of suggestive behaviour and a blow job or two. The same goes for Rebecca Winter, but I can't say before her change and reinvention, I've only seen some clips.

This thread is only toxic if those choose to make it that way. I started this because it struck my curiosity and like a lot of things that exude from my mind, it's controversial. I'm not apologizing for a subject no one wants to or has the balls to ask.

 

[c]

To admit that I didn't have an agenda would be an untruth. I listed your name to get your feedback. Not to suggest you offer these services. Truth and honesty in these types of taboo questions are what I'm looking for and perhaps the masses. I don't speak for them but I am curious to hear opinions.

My apologies if I've offended you but it was not my intention to suggest you would offer this service. BUT I will say, that if I was a professional, I would have been first in line to perform in that video with you.

Unfortunately my interest in porn performing is no longer as I prefer the discretion of intimate encounters so nobody (including porn performers) are able to have said types of encounters with me. Perhaps in another plane of existence in another dimension the two of us are porn performers hired to work together. Alas.
I hope you enjoyed my one-time jump into experimenting with exhibitionism at least.

 

[Fuggedabouditt]

Unfortunately my interest in porn performing is no longer as I prefer the discretion of intimate encounters so nobody, including porn performers cannot, have said types of encounters with me. Perhaps in another plane of existence in another dimension the two of us are porn performers hired to work together. Alas.
I hope you enjoyed my one-time jump into experimenting with exhibitionism at least.

It was very erotic I enjoyed it very much.

 

[Fuggedabouditt]

Looks like I've upset a few people.

It's an honest question and I thank the ladies for their input.

 

[User-E]

Looks like I've upset a few people.

It's an honest question and I thank the ladies for their input.

I just realized who you remind me of.

:biggrin2:

 

[ERecTile]

Unfortunately my interest in porn performing is no longer as I prefer the discretion of intimate encounters so nobody (including porn performers) are able to have said types of encounters with me. Perhaps in another plane of existence in another dimension the two of us are porn performers hired to work together. Alas.
I hope you enjoyed my one-time jump into experimenting with exhibitionism at least.

Are you willing to direct us to the film in question so that we may partake in your sojourn into exihibitionism?

 

[c]

Are you willing to direct us to the film in question so that we may partake in your sojourn into exihibitionism?

https://lmgtfy.com/?q=camilla+lush+porn

 

[Azura Rose]

I've performed in a bit of porn, but always with the same boundaries as I have with anyone that isn't one of my two fluid-bonded partners (though some of the porn I've been in has been with one of them, so barriers weren't used with her). I use condoms because that is what my partners and I have discussed and are comfortable with, whether on set, in a session, or with a friend outside of our fluid-bonded polycule.

The major difference between a fellow porn performer and a client (or a partner and a client) is one of trust and safety. If I was to do bbbj or something in porn, it would be because we're both rigorously tested with career reputations on the line if something were to go wrong. We've also signed legal documents disclosing our legal names, which is also not something I do with clients. Other porn performers, depending, may know my legal address for 2257 reasons. Again, clients don't get that (comfortable disclosing general neighbourhood with ones I trust, but that's about it).

I mean, I think the reason the question seems so weird and upsetting to us SPs is it feels like our behaviour in a completely different circumstance is creating a level of expectation. We do often get asked to do things that we do in porn that we don't offer as services (for me it's often more extreme BDSM stuff that I don't do unless I'm confident in the skills of my partner), so even if that's not what was meant here, it's a situation we do deal with. That said, it is understandable to be curious as to how, exactly, these decisions are made and how the context differs.

 

[Fuggedabouditt]

I've performed in a bit of porn, but always with the same boundaries as I have with anyone that isn't one of my two fluid-bonded partners (though some of the porn I've been in has been with one of them, so barriers weren't used with her). I use condoms because that is what my partners and I have discussed and are comfortable with, whether on set, in a session, or with a friend outside of our fluid-bonded polycule.

The major difference between a fellow porn performer and a client (or a partner and a client) is one of trust and safety. If I was to do bbbj or something in porn, it would be because we're both rigorously tested with career reputations on the line if something were to go wrong. We've also signed legal documents disclosing our legal names, which is also not something I do with clients. Other porn performers, depending, may know my legal address for 2257 reasons. Again, clients don't get that (comfortable disclosing general neighbourhood with ones I trust, but that's about it).

I mean, I think the reason the question seems so weird and upsetting to us SPs is it feels like our behaviour in a completely different circumstance is creating a level of expectation. We do often get asked to do things that we do in porn that we don't offer as services (for me it's often more extreme BDSM stuff that I don't do unless I'm confident in the skills of my partner), so even if that's not what was meant here, it's a situation we do deal with. That said, it is understandable to be curious as to how, exactly, these decisions are made and how the context differs.

This makes absolute sense Azura.

The disclosure of personal info was not discussed but assumed with the test results. I did not also put in the caveat that it should be a regular client not just some Joe off the street.

Thank you for this.

 

[ERecTile]

https://lmgtfy.com/?q=camilla+lush+porn

Thank you! Looks awesome!

Slightly off topic, but related to bare back, in my experience, SPs are VERY careful about not doing things BB. I've found that to be not so true in the MP side of the world where stories (some confirmed) of bbfs are getting more and more rampant.

 

[User-E]

Thank you! Looks awesome!

Slightly off topic, but related to bare back, in my experience, SPs are VERY careful about not doing things BB. I've found that to be not so true in the MP side of the world where stories (some confirmed) of bbfs are getting more and more rampant.

I've read on the BC boards that far more SP's offer BBFS services than you would imagine, including many 'high end' ladies.

 

[peace]

I've read on the BC boards that far more SP's offer BBFS services than you would imagine, including many 'high end' ladies.

I am always surprised people would choose BBFS despite many dangers but then again I am naive.

 

[ERecTile]

I am always surprised people would choose BBFS despite many dangers but then again I am naive.

Not naive. Just smart. EACE:

 

[Fuggedabouditt]

Let's not divert this discussion in to "every day" BBFS.

The question is, if precautions were taken as in the Porn industry between a client and SP, would unprotected sex be on the table.

This seems to be more complicated than my initial thoughts but this is what this thread is for. The disclosure of personal info. The stigma of bare sex. The line crossed between a professional shoot versus a typical session.

 

[User-E]

Let's not divert this discussion in to "every day" BBFS.

The question is, if precautions were taken as in the Porn industry between a client and SP, would unprotected sex be on the table.

This seems to be more complicated than my initial thoughts but this is what this thread is for. The disclosure of personal info. The stigma of bare sex. The line crossed between a professional shoot versus a typical session.

I guess both the client and the SP would have to decide if it's worth taking the risk of disclosing all their personal info and going through all the testing that Camilla and Azura mentioned, just to have bb sex.

 

[ERecTile]

I think bbfs should NEVER be on the table. At the end of the day, it's an unnecessary risk for both parties for very little gain. From a guy's point of view, what do you gain? Ooo, I can feel some squishy wetness on my dick. From a SP's point of view, you have so much more risk, not including guys who lie.

What about accidental bbfs? Like when the condom breaks in mid thrust and you don't feel it or know it till the next position change, or don't know own til you cum inside? What happens then? What is the protocol?

 

[Janelle@Sassys]

I think bbfs should NEVER be on the table. At the end of the day, it's an unnecessary risk for both parties for very little gain. From a guy's point of view, what do you gain? Ooo, I can feel some squishy wetness on my dick. From a SP's point of view, you have so much more risk, not including guys who lie.

What about accidental bbfs? Like when the condom breaks in mid thrust and you don't feel it or know it till the next position change, or don't know own til you cum inside? What happens then? What is the protocol?

Knock on wood but the only time I've had a condom break it was done purposely by the client. I was new to the industry and shouldn't have ignored how he was acting but I did and sure enough he had tore the condom. So at least in my experience condoms breaking out of nowhere isn't a frequent occurrence.

Obviously as an SP you should be using a second form of contraceptives, and then get tested regularly. Watch out for symptoms etc etc.

 

[User-E]

I think bbfs should NEVER be on the table. At the end of the day, it's an unnecessary risk for both parties for very little gain. From a guy's point of view, what do you gain? Ooo, I can feel some squishy wetness on my dick. From a SP's point of view, you have so much more risk, not including guys who lie.

What about accidental bbfs? Like when the condom breaks in mid thrust and you don't feel it or know it till the next position change, or don't know own til you cum inside? What happens then? What is the protocol?

You both go get tested and let each other know the results, and you abstain from sexual activity until you make sure you're clean.

 

[Fuggedabouditt]

I think bbfs should NEVER be on the table. At the end of the day, it's an unnecessary risk for both parties for very little gain. From a guy's point of view, what do you gain? Ooo, I can feel some squishy wetness on my dick. From a SP's point of view, you have so much more risk, not including guys who lie.

What about accidental bbfs? Like when the condom breaks in mid thrust and you don't feel it or know it till the next position change, or don't know own til you cum inside? What happens then? What is the protocol?

Knock on wood but the only time I've had a condom break it was done purposely by the client. I was new to the industry and shouldn't have ignored how he was acting but I did and sure enough he had tore the condom. So at least in my experience condoms breaking out of nowhere isn't a frequent occurrence.

Obviously as an SP you should be using a second form of contraceptives, and then get tested regularly. Watch out for symptoms etc etc.

In twenty plus years of hobbying and civilian life, a condom has broken 3 times. Once with a civie that resulted in pregnancy (and afterwards a vasectomy). And twice with SP's, one of those times was during greek and only discovered when pulling out after climaxing. We were both a little surprised but we dealt with it. I went to my normal checkup ahead of schedule and all was clear. The SP I assumed, did as well as she is still active although I've not seen her again.

The other time was during FS vaginal and the SP looked up at me and said how good it felt and was I sure the condom was still on. I pulled out and sure enough, it had broken. She said it was too late and told me to continue, so we did. Checkups for both afterwards and we did see each other again and gave each other the thumbs up that we were clear.

 

[Kool77]

SECRET GOOGLE MESSAGE MEANS YOU'RE WATCHING TOO MUCH PORN