Made with Love

The infamous Valerie Hugh is back from early retirement!

Jessica Rain said:
So Just to update here, apparently the money has finally been returned. It is said that miscommunication is the reason for the money not being returned right away.

The OP is happy to have gotten his money back.

Personally, I don't know what to believe, from December to May, seems like a long time of ignoring the man and other escorts who contacted on his behalf. I think public pressure played a role but he did get his money back so hense the thread was closed.

Felt it only fair fair to share here that the money was returned since the OP was copied here.

Sure sure, nothing to do with miscommunication as she had ample warnings. She had zippo choice but to give it up or be destroyed in all the review sites.

Who is you or her kidding?.
 
Remerdon said:
Sure sure, nothing to do with miscommunication as she had ample warnings. She had zippo choice but to give it up or be destroyed in all the review sites.

Who is you or her kidding?.


Who am I kidding??? Did you read what I wrote?

Clearly not. :no:Damn-Not too smart
 
Glad to see it is all resolved!





PAPA, learn, return my money or suffer the wrath of what's coming!
 
The OP should have posted here that the matter was cleared up.

Since he started the thread he should be the one that finishes it. In my opinion anyways.

But thanks Jessica just the same.
 
She cheated, why is she getting away so easily?. Don't you all care how hard you work for your money?.
 
Remerdon said:
Sure sure, nothing to do with miscommunication as she had ample warnings. She had zippo choice but to give it up or be destroyed in all the review sites.

Who is you or her kidding?.

Excellent post. I agree with you 100%.
 
Loophole said:
She cheated, why is she getting away so easily?. Don't you all care how hard you work for your money?.

IMHO, Val didn't get away with anything. She was getting pressured, to give the guy his money back. IMHO, she made all Indy SP's who demand deposits before booking, look bad.
 
Maurice Boscorelli said:
The OP should have posted here that the matter was cleared up.

Since he started the thread he should be the one that finishes it. In my opinion anyways.

But thanks Jessica just the same.


The OP isn't who had the issue with her, Fuj merely brought what was posted on the Red Board to everyone's attention here as well. However, I see your point. Many are quick to stir the pot (-) but slow or hesitant to smooth things over (+). Much like the client whose fingers work perfectly well when they want or need something but mysteriously become paralyzed when that's no longer the case.
 
Last edited:
Loophole said:
She cheated, why is she getting away so easily?. Don't you all care how hard you work for your money?.

Winslow said:
IMHO, Val didn't get away with anything. She was getting pressured, to give the guy his money back. IMHO, she made all Indy SP's who demand deposits before booking, look bad.

This ^^^.

Furthermore,
I'm not condoning her behaviour but we all get cheated. I've been cancelled on last minute, short changed, no showed, empty promised (e.g. book an hr with the possibility to extend with no real intention of extending, just trying to get perceived better service for the hr), etc. numerous times. It's the chance we all take. The matter is resolved, life goes on, don't dwell!
 
Last edited:
Sophia Sinclair said:
This ^^^.

Furthermore,
I'm not condoning her behaviour but we all get cheated. I've been cancelled on last minute, short changed, no showed, empty promised (e.g. book an hr with the possibility to extend with no real intention of extending, just trying to get perceived better service for the hr), etc. numerous times. It's the chance we all take. The matter is resolved, life goes on, don't dwell!

Excellent post Sophia. However, I personally have to dwell. No way in a million yrs, would I ever send an Indy SP a deposit, after that Val fiasco. What made it even worse, was when her Indy buddy, "the chick with the tiny waist", came to Val's defence....LMAO
 
Winslow said:
Excellent post Sophia. However, I personally have to dwell. No way in a million yrs, would I ever send an Indy SP a deposit, after that Val fiasco. What made it even worse, was when her Indy buddy, "the chick with the tiny waist", came to Val's defence....LMAO

Really, even to me, who many moons ago during my brief stint downtown took you to your first HUBGFE soiree and spent oodles of time with you that day just hanging out at no charge in an effort to help you get acquainted with other like minded HUBGFE hobbyists? That was done out of the goodness of my heart and for no other reason.

It's for the above mentioned reasons that I now ask for references, etc. so I understand your point of view, but as I stated, these things have happened to me a multitude of times before I finally said ENOUGH! Often, board members read about one isolated incident that happened to someone else and immediately jump on the bandwagon.

I'm truly understanding now why so many providers are turning to Twitter. It's the pervasive negativity on all the boards that is driving us in that direction.
 
Sophia Sinclair said:
Really, even to me, who many moons ago during my brief stint downtown took you to your first HUBGFE soiree and spent oodles of time with you that day just hanging out at no charge in an effort to help you get acquainted with other like minded HUBGFE hobbyists? That was done out of the goodness of my heart and for no other reason.

It's for the above mentioned reasons that I now ask for references, etc. so I understand your point of view, but as I stated, these things have happened to me a multitude of times before I finally said ENOUGH! Often, board members read about one isolated incident that happened to someone else and immediately jump on the bandwagon.

I'm truly understanding now why so many providers are turning to Twitter. It's the pervasive negativity on all the boards that is driving us in that direction.

Sophia, I remember that experience in 2012, and it was very nice of you to do that for me. Much appreciated!!

You are definitely, one of the nice and very reputable Indy's out there. However, this isn't about you.

IMHO, this Val chick allegedly was trying to rip a client off, for services that were not performed. IMHO,the only reason that Val got caught was due to the power of the review boards. Of course, a lot of SP's don't like review boards. They would probably just rather deal with guys, who don't even know that review boards exist??

IMHO, twitter is making the hobby even tougher for guys with modest means. A lot of Sp's show all the gifts and all the vacations they take on twitter. Also, some SP's have become such twitter celebrities, that you literally have to book them 5 yrs in advance, to get an appt---LOL That is, if you pass their screening of a million references, and your linked in ID etc
 
Winslow said:
Sophia, I remember that experience in 2012, and it was very nice of you to do that for me. Much appreciated!!

You are definitely, one of the nice and very reputable Indy's out there. However, this isn't about you.

IMHO, this Val chick allegedly was trying to rip a client off, for services that were not performed. IMHO,the only reason that Val got caught was due to the power of the review boards. Of course, a lot of SP's don't like review boards. They would probably just rather deal with guys, who don't even know that review boards exist??

IMHO, twitter is making the hobby even tougher for guys with modest means. A lot of Sp's show all the gifts and all the vacations they take on twitter. Also, some SP's have become such twitter celebrities, that you literally have to book them 5 yrs in advance, to get an appt---LOL That is, if you pass their screening of a million references, and your linked in ID etc

I agree with Sophia, this indicates caution is needed when dealing with Val. Lumping all independents together is unnecessary and unfair. Ensuring clients have an avenue to correct situations like this is the only valid reason I see for review boards outside of places like the Lounge where it's a community...

smiles, cat
 
Winslow said:
IMHO, twitter is making the hobby even tougher for guys with modest means. A lot of Sp's show all the gifts and all the vacations they take on twitter. Also, some SP's have become such twitter celebrities, that you literally have to book them 5 yrs in advance, to get an appt---LOL That is, if you pass their screening of a million references, and your linked in ID etc


Ok, so besides the lumping is all together, can I ask what is wrong with an SP being successful? Because that whole last paragraph, which has nothing to do with Val I might add, seem like complaining to me.

Let's read it together because you have basically said a)modest hobbist has issues and feels it is tougher for him when an SP is receiving gifts and vacations and b) some SPs are so successful that they book way in advance and can be picky about the clients they see to the point that they have a very strict screening policy.

And it is all not fair with a pout face.

Sounds like you want a million dollars and are blaming guys who are CEOs.
 
catherine st.claire said:
I agree with Sophia, this indicates caution is needed when dealing with Val. Lumping all independents together is unnecessary and unfair. Ensuring clients have an avenue to correct situations like this is the only valid reason I see for review boards outside of places like the Lounge where it's a community...

smiles, cat


Hi cat, I don't want to make enemies with you, but isn't the main purpose of review boards, to actually review Sp's??---LOL
 
Jessica Rain said:
Ok, so besides the lumping is all together, can I ask what is wrong with an SP being successful? Because that whole last paragraph, which has nothing to do with Val I might add, seem like complaining to me.

Let's read it together because you have basically said a)modest hobbist has issues and feels it is tougher for him when an SP is receiving gifts and vacations and b) some SPs are so successful that they book way in advance and can be picky about the clients they see to the point that they have a very strict screening policy.

And it is all not fair with a pout face.

Sounds like you want a million dollars and are blaming guys who are CEOs.

Hi Jessica, IMHO, nothing wrong with an SP being successful. However, it kinds of puts pressure on the guys, to bring SP's gifts, in addition to paying their fees.

Jessica, you should know me by now. I love complaining....LMAO
 
Was it truly a miscommunication? We don’t know from the lack of response from both parties.
Seeing people chime in without knowing what happened only served to muddy the situation and taint the industry as a whole.
 
Winslow said:
Hi Jessica, IMHO, nothing wrong with an SP being successful. However, it kinds of puts pressure on the guys, to bring SP's gifts, in addition to paying their fees.

Jessica, you should know me by now. I love complaining....LMAO


Ah but see does it put pressure on you? Or do you make yourself feel that?

And for the guys that give gifts, don't you think they like receiving some reckongition for that? They do go the extra mile so the SP acknowledges.

Just like with the fat shaming thread. She made herself feel the way she did. Not the park. This is the same. It is not the SP or the other client. It is on the individual if they make themselves feel pressured.

I do like when you complain. It makes for great debate. LOL
 
Winslow said:
Of course, a lot of SP's don't like review boards. They would probably just rather deal with guys, who don't even know that review boards exist??

Well of course. What possible reason would a service provider have for a forum that enables a community of consumers who will invariably scrutinize the quality and consistency their services, while demanding value for money? The unfortunate part is that the lack of integrity and honesty on the part of the consumers by far exceeds that of the providers.

Winslow said:
IMHO, twitter is making the hobby even tougher for guys with modest means. A lot of Sp's show all the gifts and all the vacations they take on twitter. Also, some SP's have become such twitter celebrities, that you literally have to book them 5 yrs in advance, to get an appt---LOL That is, if you pass their screening of a million references, and your linked in ID etc

Winslow - you simply need to hobby within your means, dude. If you can't afford her, you can't afford her. You need to accept that and not project your personal limitations on her, and you can't blame her (or twitter) for her success. If she provides an exceptional, consistently value-added, and exceedingly satisfying experience, she deserves every penny that comes her way. Being an escort for a living ain't a walk in the park, no matter what public image they project. Those that do it and do it well earn their success one session at a time, and it never gets easier, only harder as time goes by - don't kid yourself.

Where screening is concerned, also easy. If you can't abide, just step aside. Many others can and will.
 
Back
Top Bottom