D
DannyDeVito
Guest
- Thread starter
- #362
Hillary was a professional politician who cared about lining her family's pockets. I say let a non politician have a crack at the next four years!
R
ReservoirDog
Guest
- Thread starter
- #366
[h=1]Michigan Recount Exposes Clinton Electoral Fraud: Half of Detroit Votes Show Signs of Tampering[/h]
Votes in Hillary-heavy Detroit may have been counted up to 6 times
This is some next-level poetic justice: A Michigan recount backed by Jill Stein and the Democrats, and intended to deligitimize Trump's astonishing victory on November 8, has actually exposed widespread fraud in precincts which voted heavily for Clinton.
https://russia-insider.com/en/michi...lf-detroit-votes-show-signs-tampering/ri18118
Hillary even sucks at cheating. Via the Detroit News:
Michigan’s largest county voted overwhelmingly for Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton, but officials couldn’t reconcile vote totals for 610 of 1,680 precincts during a countywide canvass of vote results late last month.
Most of those are in heavily Democratic Detroit, where the number of ballots in precinct poll books did not match those of voting machine printout reports in 59 percent of precincts, 392 of 662.
According to state law, precincts whose poll books don’t match with ballots can’t be recounted. If that happens, original election results stand.
“It’s not good,” conceded Daniel Baxter, elections director for the city of Detroit.
Understatement of the millenium?
Here's the best part: Officials blame the scanners used to tally votes for the huge discrepancies. Hard to believe:
Once they started the Michigan recount in earnest, and knowing he would be exposed, the Detroit City Clerk Daniel Baxter all of a sudden started claiming that the optical scanners which read the paper ballots did not work the day of the election. Baxter blamed the discrepancies on decade-old voting machines. That is his cover story. Nothing like this was mentioned until he realized their voting fraud scheme would be detected.
Baxter’s claim is that, when trying to push the ballots through the readers, the ballots would be stuck and they’d have to push them through again thus ‘ACCIDENTALLY’ resulting in a double count. He says the poll workers sometimes ‘FORGET’ to adjust the machine count and instead let the ballot count twice.
Sounds reasonable.
It gets worse, though. Vigilant citizens who observed the recount said that there were numerous signs of vote tampering in Hillary-heavy precincts.
Ken Crider, a 2014 Republican candidate for District 19 of the Michigan House of Representatives, said he watched the recount effort in Cobo Hall in Detroit with his wife, Penny. In a Facebook post Tuesday, he claimed to have witnessed some serious ballot discrepancies. Crider wrote:
MUST READ! Penny Crider and I just got back from helping watch the recount at Cobo Hall in Detroit. On Nov. 8th (Election Day) the election officials at 8:00 p.m. shut down the polls. They then reconciled the differences from the machine count and the voter count on the computer. At this point, a Metal tag/seal with a serial number is put on the box and the box was taken away.
Penny’s precinct, Detroit Precinct #152 had an unbroken seal and everything looked proper. The tag on the box said 306 and the book said 306 and the ticket said 306, so there should be 306 paper ballots on the box, right. Well when they pulled out the ballots the stack seemed short and when they finished separating the two page ballot to count the Presidential page only guess how many ballots were in the box? 304 no, 299 nope, 200 nada, how about 100 wrong again. There were only exactly 50 paper ballots in a locked sealed box that again was supposed to have 306. HMMMM.
Oh I forgot to add, since there was a discrepancy in the two numbers, the original count stands.
One more thing my precinct (sorry I forgot the number), had 525 votes on the book, tag and ticket and we counted 525 ballots the election official was praising the Lord “Hallelujah we have a countable precinct” Jill Stein had three (3) votes.
In other words: In Democratic Detroit, each vote was counted 6 times!
Just imagine the landslide popular vote victory Trump would have enjoyed if the Democrats played fair on Election Day.
Votes in Hillary-heavy Detroit may have been counted up to 6 times
This is some next-level poetic justice: A Michigan recount backed by Jill Stein and the Democrats, and intended to deligitimize Trump's astonishing victory on November 8, has actually exposed widespread fraud in precincts which voted heavily for Clinton.
https://russia-insider.com/en/michi...lf-detroit-votes-show-signs-tampering/ri18118
Hillary even sucks at cheating. Via the Detroit News:
Michigan’s largest county voted overwhelmingly for Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton, but officials couldn’t reconcile vote totals for 610 of 1,680 precincts during a countywide canvass of vote results late last month.
Most of those are in heavily Democratic Detroit, where the number of ballots in precinct poll books did not match those of voting machine printout reports in 59 percent of precincts, 392 of 662.
According to state law, precincts whose poll books don’t match with ballots can’t be recounted. If that happens, original election results stand.
“It’s not good,” conceded Daniel Baxter, elections director for the city of Detroit.
Understatement of the millenium?
Here's the best part: Officials blame the scanners used to tally votes for the huge discrepancies. Hard to believe:
Once they started the Michigan recount in earnest, and knowing he would be exposed, the Detroit City Clerk Daniel Baxter all of a sudden started claiming that the optical scanners which read the paper ballots did not work the day of the election. Baxter blamed the discrepancies on decade-old voting machines. That is his cover story. Nothing like this was mentioned until he realized their voting fraud scheme would be detected.
Baxter’s claim is that, when trying to push the ballots through the readers, the ballots would be stuck and they’d have to push them through again thus ‘ACCIDENTALLY’ resulting in a double count. He says the poll workers sometimes ‘FORGET’ to adjust the machine count and instead let the ballot count twice.
Sounds reasonable.
It gets worse, though. Vigilant citizens who observed the recount said that there were numerous signs of vote tampering in Hillary-heavy precincts.
Ken Crider, a 2014 Republican candidate for District 19 of the Michigan House of Representatives, said he watched the recount effort in Cobo Hall in Detroit with his wife, Penny. In a Facebook post Tuesday, he claimed to have witnessed some serious ballot discrepancies. Crider wrote:
MUST READ! Penny Crider and I just got back from helping watch the recount at Cobo Hall in Detroit. On Nov. 8th (Election Day) the election officials at 8:00 p.m. shut down the polls. They then reconciled the differences from the machine count and the voter count on the computer. At this point, a Metal tag/seal with a serial number is put on the box and the box was taken away.
Penny’s precinct, Detroit Precinct #152 had an unbroken seal and everything looked proper. The tag on the box said 306 and the book said 306 and the ticket said 306, so there should be 306 paper ballots on the box, right. Well when they pulled out the ballots the stack seemed short and when they finished separating the two page ballot to count the Presidential page only guess how many ballots were in the box? 304 no, 299 nope, 200 nada, how about 100 wrong again. There were only exactly 50 paper ballots in a locked sealed box that again was supposed to have 306. HMMMM.
Oh I forgot to add, since there was a discrepancy in the two numbers, the original count stands.
One more thing my precinct (sorry I forgot the number), had 525 votes on the book, tag and ticket and we counted 525 ballots the election official was praising the Lord “Hallelujah we have a countable precinct” Jill Stein had three (3) votes.
In other words: In Democratic Detroit, each vote was counted 6 times!
Just imagine the landslide popular vote victory Trump would have enjoyed if the Democrats played fair on Election Day.
R
ReservoirDog
Guest
- Thread starter
- #367
“No, it’s okay,” Trump said as the crowd jeered a reference to Clinton. “Forget it. That plays great before the election. Now, we don’t care, right? Right."
I thought Hillary was a corrupt criminal that committed obvious proven crimes and Trump was going to jail her?
I thought Hillary was a corrupt criminal that committed obvious proven crimes and Trump was going to jail her?
papasmerf
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2010
- Messages
- 33,614
U
User-E
Guest
- Thread starter
- #370
I gagged several times.
papasmerf
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2010
- Messages
- 33,614
Try it, you'll like it.
oldguyzer
Reviewer
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2011
- Messages
- 15,067
That's what they said about tofu bacon. They were wrong.
U
User-E
Guest
- Thread starter
- #373
oldguyzer
Reviewer
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2011
- Messages
- 15,067
I'm working on suppressing my gag reflex.
It's going to be 4 long years of Trump.
Half of America will be suppressing its gag reflex for the next four years.
papasmerf
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2010
- Messages
- 33,614
I'm working on suppressing my gag reflex.
It's going to be 4 long years of Trump.
.
Correction 8 YEARS!!!!!
papasmerf
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2010
- Messages
- 33,614
Most of us are happy to have a fool leaving office and overjoyed at the reaction of the fools who love him.
oldguyzer
Reviewer
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2011
- Messages
- 15,067
"Most of us" wouldn't seem to be reflected in the popular vote. Unless, like Trump, you discount every vote against you as an illegal vote.
Be careful what you wish for.:biggrin2:
papasmerf
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2010
- Messages
- 33,614
Fact is while the electoral college seems dated and silly....It prevents the densely populated areas of the Country from dictating who is elected president....It in theory provides equal weight to each district. Thus the somewhat confusing results.
U
User-E
Guest
- Thread starter
- #380
I'd love to see Trump get a buzz cut. His comb-over is ridiculous.
