Made with Love

Trump thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter User-E
  • Start date Start date
cristycurves said:
Why don't you explain how he isn't connected to Russia, and then explain how all those who've found the Russia hacks are wrong. Then show me proof of your God, or Jesus or the other name he also uses:)Since we're jumping around topics in this thread:)

Explain to me why Russia won...What did they win?
 
They got an asshole in the white house and you keep kissing it:)
 
LOL, yes I'd expect no better a choice for *you*......but only yours? Have you not heard of dual citizenships :wink2:
 
cristycurves said:
LOL, yes I'd expect no better a choice for *you*......but only yours? Have you not heard of dual citizenships :wink2:

I have

Now back to the Russia question you skillfully try to avoid.
 
Thank you for the skillful add:) How can the obvious be explained, even wikipedia gets it right......
 
cristycurves said:
Thank you for the skillful add:) How can the obvious be explained, even wikipedia gets it right......

So in essence you just are spouting the Left line and have no idea what it means:biggrin2:
 
Yeah you're right. I'll admit it absolutely Russia *did not* interfere with the election, nor tamper with any online ad,posts, tweets etc that you've proven........right?





















WRONG......LOL:)
 
22140973_1707253359309349_3194416535027979080_n.jpg
 
cristycurves said:
And the bad news is that Trump one, rather Russia won:)

The Russia thing is not going to gain traction with the general public. Russia didn't hack into the election voting machines or anything, so they didn't interfere with the elections directly. They did spread a lot of misinformation ads, which is actually quite a democratic way of doing things, as corporations, superPACs, and other entities use the exact same methods to influence elections. So there's nothing Russia did that nobody else does during an election.

There's some suggestion that they hacked the emails that Wikileaks posted from the DNC and Hillary Clinton campaign. There's no proof they did that either, but whoever did that actually did the American public some good, because that's actually whistleblowing, and they showed how crappy the Democrats were as a party. They colluded to make sure Bernie Sanders couldn't win the nomination, because they couldn't be sure that Hillary could win this nomination any better than she was able to win the 2008 nomination. She had 8 years to come up with a better strategy, come up with good answers for all of the stuff that Obama destroyed her with 8 years ago, and she decided that she did everything right back in 2008, and no changes were necessary. So to make sure that the same thing doesn't happen to them this year, that happened in 2008, they sabotaged the primaries to make sure an unknown old socialist senator from Vermont who buys his suits off the rack couldn't catch up to her. He still ended up making up a 60 point deficit to finish a close 2nd to her though.

Instead of going after Russia, they should just impeach Trump on his already known scandals, and all of things he's said so far. They have more than enough to go after him already. They just need to get the Republicans out of there. The Republicans impeached Bill Clinton for nothing more than getting a blowjob, so the bar for impeachment isn't that high.
 
blackram said:
The Russia thing is not going to gain traction with the general public. Russia didn't hack into the election voting machines or anything, so they didn't interfere with the elections directly. They did spread a lot of misinformation ads, which is actually quite a democratic way of doing things, as corporations, superPACs, and other entities use the exact same methods to influence elections. So there's nothing Russia did that nobody else does during an election.

There's some suggestion that they hacked the emails that Wikileaks posted from the DNC and Hillary Clinton campaign. There's no proof they did that either, but whoever did that actually did the American public some good, because that's actually whistleblowing, and they showed how crappy the Democrats were as a party. They colluded to make sure Bernie Sanders couldn't win the nomination, because they couldn't be sure that Hillary could win this nomination any better than she was able to win the 2008 nomination. She had 8 years to come up with a better strategy, come up with good answers for all of the stuff that Obama destroyed her with 8 years ago, and she decided that she did everything right back in 2008, and no changes were necessary. So to make sure that the same thing doesn't happen to them this year, that happened in 2008, they sabotaged the primaries to make sure an unknown old socialist senator from Vermont who buys his suits off the rack couldn't catch up to her. He still ended up making up a 60 point deficit to finish a close 2nd to her though.

Instead of going after Russia, they should just impeach Trump on his already known scandals, and all of things he's said so far. They have more than enough to go after him already. They just need to get the Republicans out of there. The Republicans impeached Bill Clinton for nothing more than getting a blowjob, so the bar for impeachment isn't that high.
No matter who influences elections, dems, or repubs, it's wrong when you win by collusion...... I agree Trump should be impeached, but I'm also smart enough to know he's so far up Putins ass, he can taste his lunch and that without their interference he wouldn't be sitting in the white house......now where did I hear that:) He wouldn't have any money either if it weren't for the Russians. Trump is a fool, nothing smart, or sincere about him. He wants to rule, to gain more wealth and will fuck over whom ever gets in his path, to do so.
 
cristycurves said:
No matter who influences elections, dems, or repubs, it's wrong when you win by collusion...... I agree Trump should be impeached, but I'm also smart enough to know he's so far up Putins ass, he can taste his lunch and that without their interference he wouldn't be sitting in the white house......now where did I hear that:) He wouldn't have any money either if it weren't for the Russians. Trump is a fool, nothing smart, or sincere about him. He wants to rule, to gain more wealth and will fuck over whom ever gets in his path, to do so.

Putin doesn't have that kind of control over American elections. He can attempt to influence it, sure, but that's normal fare for most American elections by any number of lobbying firms and political action committee groups. When it came down to a choice between two wildly unpopular figures, he came out less unpopular, or at least he spread his unpopularity around more strategically than Clinton did.

Russia didn't tell Clinton not to go to Wisconsin, Michigan, or Pennsylvania's rural districts -- she did that all on her own. For large portions of the campaign she didn't even bother to go campaigning for voters, she decided to instead campaign for donors instead. She basically showed that she didn't give a fuck about voters, she was more interested in her donors. Campaigning for donors is a lot more comfortable for her, because they are her type of people: the campaign venue is inside mansions or 5-star restaurants, sip wine and caviar, etc. Campaigning for voters means the venues are arenas and gyms, eat hot dogs and coke, etc. :beurk:

Russia also didn't tell her to put out clueless policies: "Everything is fine, nothing is gonna change under me!" At a time, when people are screaming out to fix income inequality, fix the healthcare system, stop job losses to China, etc. Hillary came out with a tremendously clueless agenda.

I could go on, but in the end, Hillary has no one but herself to blame for her loss. Even most people that voted for her, didn't like her, they just voted for her because they hated Trump worse. On the other side, you could say that there were also people who voted for Trump, because they hated Hillary worse.
 
Back
Top Bottom