Made with Love

UPS fires 250 employees for staging a 90-minute protest to defend co-worker

Stan Lee

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2011
Messages
365
Surprise to all. Unions can't always save jobs.

UPS is firing 250 Queens, N.Y., drivers for walking off the job during a 90-minute protest in February.

The company dismissed 20 of the workers after their shifts Monday and issued notices of termination to another 230 employees, notifying them that they will be fired once the company has trained their replacements, UPS spokesman Steve Gaut told Business Insider.


The workers were protesting the dismissal of longtime employee and union activist Jairo Reyes, who was fired over an hours dispute, according to Gaut. The New York Daily News first reported on the firings.


Local politicians are threatening to cancel city contracts that give UPS millions of dollars in breaks on parking fines.

"They took a grievance with one employee and turned it into notices of termination with 250 workers," New York City Councilman Jimmy Van Bramer told . "That’s outrageous. These are good, hardworking employees who have a contract for UPS. To try and break this contract, break this union, is something that is unacceptable and we can’t tolerate."

UPS fired back that it might need to terminate additional employees if the city alters its contract.

"UPS appreciates its business with the New York public offices," Gaut said. "Ultimately if that business is reduced or eliminated, the result will be reduced need for UPS employees to serve the pick-up and delivery requirements of City offices, potentially impacting the livelihoods of the many local UPS employees that did not join in the illegal work stoppage."

UPS employs 1,400 workers at the Maspeth distribution center where the strike took place on Feb. 26.

"When a group of 250 employees walk out for 90 minutes it is a significant disruption in the delivery of parcels or packages to customers on that day," Gaut said. "We get penalties if we don't deliver on time."

For that reason, strikes are not an approved method of conflict resolution in UPS' contract with the union, he said.

The local branch of the Teamsters union that represents the dismissed workers has described the firings as "a heartless attack on drivers and their families."

"The company fired a group of drivers to try to divide us, create panic, or try to get Local 804 to cave in and sell out. That is not going to happen," the union .


One of the workers facing dismissal had just returned to his job after a serious accident, according to the Daily News.

"Domenick DeDomenico, 40, was in a coma for 10 days after getting hit by a car last year while delivering packages for UPS," the Daily News' Ginger Adams Otis reported.

"He fought back from serious brain injuries and needed a year of speech and physical therapy."

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/ups-fires-250-employees-staging-143805147.html
 
I guess they didn't enjoy or appreciate such high paying jobs :don'twantto-see:/
 
I like their approach and take no prisoners. In other words they are saying we put in the investment for this company and you either play by the rules or leave.

I love democracy.
 
I am curious as to why the original employee was fired.

I'm also curious as to who organized this wold cat strike., because they need a good smack upside the head too. As they sadly found out, that's not the way to solidarity with a coworker. What was that about failing to learn from history?

Now if they had of gone out to protest during their breaks, or when they're off shift, then the fault would have been on UPS.
 
I like their approach and take no prisoners. In other words they are saying we put in the investment for this company and you either play by the rules or leave.

I love democracy.

Care to elaborate how this is democracy?

Now you say it's nice to see UPS saying 'play by the rules or leave," and you like it. That's also an attitude results in a lot of work place issues...More commonly referred to grievances. See most unionized shops have what lay people call contracts, but really they are called collective agreements. It's called that because the employer and the union (representing the workers) sit down and bargain until they reach an agreement about working conditions that they both agree upon.

Here's where the problem comes up. Some manages still like to thump their chests and say "me manager, me make rules." To which the union steward has to hold up a little booklet and point out "no, this is the rules." In turn the manager usually has a hissy fit because he can't do what he wants.
 
Blank Dave, you're making me cry! You sir can be my shop steward anytime!
 
Back
Top Bottom