Made with Love

Will you admit the truth?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cristycurves
  • Start date Start date
I think another difference between this an other boards is, the mods don't use it as their free for all to out members, post shill posts, to belittle anyone, and other foolishness. They run it as a business, not as their personal play forum. We've members who, are intelligent and savvy to all types of news, who post relevant and informative information that teaches and informs us. Members here are active in combating issues that can cause harm to others and affect this industry negatively. All in all, professionalism rules here even when it is occasionally veered of course.
Btw I didn't receive any texts or calls on bell lets talk day.....Hmmmmmm. lol.
 
Since I've just discover this site and still getting the hang of it it is not ,yet ,my first site...
I have to admit that my favourite site is not even a canadian one,
I spend way to much time on Best G F E...Too bad I am not the touring type I would know where to visit lol.
It is very similar to here I think with us ladies feeling welcome to chime in...
 
Since I've just discover this site and still getting the hang of it it is not ,yet ,my first site...
I have to admit that my favourite site is not even a canadian one,
I spend way to much time on Best G F E...Too bad I am not the touring type I would know where to visit lol.
It is very similar to here I think with us ladies feeling welcome to chime in...

Welcome to the board Lily.
 
I must say that saddens me. That you would give any support to that second board, especially. Another thing that I find sad is that you'd give any merit to anything that is said there, as most is spurred by an immature reject, that most women wouldn't touch with a borrowed pussy. If anyone has any respect for the men & women in this industry, it is my opinion, they'd not take part in a board that does as much possible to "dirty" this industry and to belittle those within it. There are definite rights and wrongs within this industry and those which surpass any justifications and one is that board, it is a wrong, on all fronts, and it's existence is an insult to those of us who want this industry to thrive and to be good in all ways.

You really truly contradict yourself. Many of your comments defy logics.
 
thesun said:
You really truly contradict yourself. Many of your comments defy logics.

Shining again, lol, good to see and good to know who you're supportive of, no surprise there. So... many of my comments defy logic.....Hmmmmmm , yet you continually read and reply to them, is that logical?
 
Fake news again.

The wackiest things stars do to their vaginas

Female celebs these days? They just can’t stop talking about (caring for) their vaginas.This week, “Beauty and the Beast” actress Emma Watson revealed how she uses a $40 product called Fur Oil on her pubic hair.

“It’s an amazing all-purpose product,” the 26-year-old told beauty website Into the Gloss. She uses it on her eyebrows — as well as her lady parts.

She’s certainly not the first star to open up about varying treatments designed to keep things shipshape down there.

Here are five other examples
The wackiest things stars do to their vaginas | New York Post
 
Which of the sites that you are on is your fave and why?

Perhaps its a bit of a survey bias to ask people on site X which is their favourite... lol.

but currently I'm logged into two and I've been posted on both.

The other one is the one I met you on, Christy.

(which the mods here will delete if I say it by name).
 
Any truth here :-Cool/"

That's the irony of the difference between reality and what we would like to believe about ourselves.

I've always enjoyed how women will go out of their way to objectify themselves, and then complain about being objectified. LOL.
 
Perhaps its a bit of a survey bias to ask people on site X which is their favourite... lol.

but currently I'm logged into two and I've been posted on both.

The other one is the one I met you on, Christy.

(which the mods here will delete if I say it by name).

Not necessarily bias, many here are on other boards and it tends to be human nature to favor one thing or things over another. And I know, I remember,:wink2:, my memory is very good when I use it, lol. So which do you prefer.......:)
 
Last edited:
That's the irony of the difference between reality and what we would like to believe about ourselves.

I've always enjoyed how women will go out of their way to objectify themselves, and then complain about being objectified. LOL.

Since I'm a woman who objectifies herself, so some might feel.....I'll say this.... the former statement about golddiggers holds water, the later concerning your point about objectification, imo doesn't, and I'll explain....
If I want to flaunt my body and offer it to whom ever, that is my choice and my doing, I'm not objectifying myself, since I'm in charge and aware of all I'm doing and I'm expecting men to think of sex when viewing what I put out there. But when men sexualize unsolicited images, acts, and view and or judge a women as being of sexual value only, then that is objectification, and that is not solicited simply because a women makes herself look nice, or dresses sensually or advertised in a commercial.
However if men seek to meet women by promoting their wealth, then they're going to attract women who seek wealth, ie: golddiggers. If you want to meet a woman of equal wealth, class, character, etc, then advertise to those qualities as well:), then you may still get golddiggers, but if you truly care, you should be able to differentiate between those who seek $$ only and those who seek a whole person:)
Truthfully, I've never met a women whose used her sexuality to attract a man, then whose complained about the man just wanting sex...so the quote image imo is a bad comparison.
 
Not necessarily bias, many here are on other boards and it tends to be human nature to favor one thing or things over another. And I know, I remember,:wink2:, my memory is very good when I use it, lol. So which do you prefer.......:)

hard to decide... the other one is generally nicer, but less active at least for local people
 
Well I have to disagree about the "nicer". The other is heavily censored, and very biased, which doesn't make it nicer or better. Believe me, simply because things look better on the surface doesn't mean they are:) We're all adults and we should be able to speak our minds, that's why I like it here and here you can agree, or disagree with anyone, like or dislike anyone, without being continually policed, at least not as much as the other site. And that may lead to hearing/reading things that aren't so nice, but people aren't always nice, that's reality. Not someones version of how discussions should be carried out:) Just my view though:)
 
Business and economic majors are most likely to be psychopaths. Read it a while ago.
 
Back
Top Bottom