Made with Love

Ashley Madison out of business?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wanker
  • Start date Start date
Is this the Ashley Madison hacker?

Security researcher Brian Krebs claims to have found clues to possible suspect's Twitter account


https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technol...827265/Is-this-the-Ashley-Madison-hacker.html

More interestingly, this article shows that Ashley Madison was a big sausage fest:


Separately, it has emerged that Ashley Madison was even more male-heavy than the original hack suggested, with a huge proportion of the registered female users apparently inactive.

While there were 5.5 million women in the Ashley Madison database against 31 million men, it appears that an overwhelming proportion of these female users were fake. When Gizmodo analysed usage data, however, it found that just a fraction of the registered female users actually logged on.

20.2 million male Ashley Madison users would check their messages - two thirds of its registered users. However, just 1,492 female users - or 0.03 per cent of registered users - did so.

 
Barely any real women on Ashley Madison: Report

Have an affair? More like: No girls allowed.
A writer for tech news site Gizmodo analyzed the leaked Ashley Madison data and came to the conclusion that, not only are 95% of the women on the site fake accounts, but of those who are likely real, very few logged back in after creating an account. In short, husbands of the world, breathe easy: there are barely any wives cheating on Ashley Madison.

It's no secret there are overwhelmingly more men than women on the site. And Ashley Madison has confessed that some of its profiles are fake -- "for entertainment" purposes only.
But the recent data breach shows just how many are obviously created to give the impression there are women on the site with whom men can cheat.

Gizmodo writer Annalee Newitz ran the Ashley Madison profiles through scripts that identify "anomalous patterns" and discovered several accounts shared similar e-mail addresses -- including ashleymadison.com domains -- as well as IP numbers, common names, and other oddities that point to phony accounts.

Even more damning was a check into account use. Of the roughly 37 million accounts on Ashley Madison, only 1,492 women ever checked their inbox for messages.

"Whatever the answer, the more I examined those 5.5 million female profiles, the more obvious it became that none of them had ever talked to men on the site, or even used the site at all after creating a profile," Newitz wrote.

https://www.torontosun.com/2015/08/27/barely-any-real-women-on-ashley-madison-report
 
For the guys who found themselves on the Ashley Madison data dump, how many of you actually met any women on it? How much money did you waste on it? I heard it was something like over $200 for only 3 months of usage?

I thought about getting on it, once or twice, but judging from my experience with other sites, I figured it had vastly more men than women on it, so I avoided it, especially at those prices. But friends of mine suggested this one was real, that there really were real women on it. :blush2:
 
This thread about Ashley Madison going out of business started 4 years ago, based on a misleading headline back then. But 4 years on, it looks like the prophesy might really be about to be filled!

Adultery website Ashley Madison insists it's not shutting down - IBNLive


Ottawa: Ashley Madison, the embattled website catering to affair-seeking clients, on Monday rejected predictions that it will soon be forced to shutter its operations, saying its troubles have been "greatly exaggerated."
Yeah, that's usually what companies that are about to go out of business say, just before they go out of business.

Avid Life Media said the male to female ratio of its clients is 1.2 to one.

A hacker group calling itself the "Impact Team" earlier this month released information stolen from the company's servers, as well as corporate emails and sensitive computer source code.

Gizmodo looked at the data and said it showed little if any activity from the purported 5.5 million female members of Ashley Madison, who were online with an estimated 31 million male subscribers.

It concluded that the vast majority of profiles of women on Ashley Madison were fake, or created by automated "bots."
Gizmodo traced many of the IP addresses for females back to Ashley Madison itself.

The most popular female last name on the site also matched the name of a former employee.
So it looks like the privacy breach wasn't enough to put it out of business, but what will put it out of business is the discovery that there really aren't any real women on this site at all.
 
So it looks like the privacy breach wasn't enough to put it out of business, but what will put it out of business is the discovery that there really aren't any real women on this site at all.

What I discovered was that the world of Ashley Madison was a far more dystopian place than anyone had realized. This isn't a debauched wonderland of men cheating on their wives. It isn't even a sadscape of 31 million men competing to attract those 5.5 million women in the database. Instead, it's like a science fictional future where every woman on Earth is dead, and some Dilbert-like engineer has replaced them with badly-designed robots.

Those millions of Ashley Madison men were paying to hook up with women who appeared to have created profiles and then simply disappeared. Were they cobbled together by bots and bored admins, or just user debris? Whatever the answer, the more I examined those 5.5 million female profiles, the more obvious it became that none of them had ever talked to men on the site, or even used the site at all after creating a profile. Actually, scratch that. As I'll explain below, there's a good chance that about 12,000 of the profiles out of millions belonged to actual, real women who were active users of Ashley Madison.

I fear the number of deaths related to this hacking will grow.
I wonder who the first BIG name "Family Values" Right-Winger to be pinned will be.


https://gizmodo.com/almost-none-of-the-women-in-the-ashley-madison-database-1725558944
 
When data from the massive Ashley Madison hack first leaked online, one tiny bright spot was that researchers said the company appeared to use a strong algorithm to encrypt users’ passwords. But now one group says it already decoded more than 11 million passwords because programming errors in how that encryption was applied left the information less secure than originally thought.

And the passwords unearthed so far by the decoding hobbyists, known as CynoSure Prime, suggest that many who were seeking thrills on the infidelity-focused site had poor digital hygiene.

The top password uncovered so far: 123456, according to Ars Technica.

The other passwords that made the Top 5 aren’t much better: 12345, password, DEFAULT and 123456789.

But those (awful) passwords shouldn’t be too surprising: By some surveys, “123456” has been the most popular password uncovered in data breaches during the past two years.

As a quick reminder, using super-common passwords makes it much easier for bad guys to just guess their way into your accounts. And it’s a bad idea to reuse passwords, too — otherwise, a malicious hacker might be able to leverage a password uncovered in one breach to break into one of your other personal accounts.

Avid Life Media, Ashley Madison’s parent company, did not immediately respond to a request for comment about how the passwords were encrypted.

brooksd0.jpg.size.xxlarge.letterbox.jpg


https://www.thestar.com/business/20...ss-of-11-million-client-chosen-passwords.html

 
Ashley Madison hacking scandal: Robot profiles describe in ToS | BGR
https://bgr.com/2015/09/15/ashley-madison-hacking-scandal-robot-profiles/

"Ashley Madison users who are annoyed that they wasted money chatting with robots have no reason to be upset — it turns out the company told them all about it in its terms of service. The Guardian points out that before signing up with Ashley Madison, users had to agree that they understood that not all profiles on the site would be of real people and that the website created its own profiles for its own purposes."
 
[h=1]Ashley Madison hack was an inside job: John McAfee[/h]
 
Ashley Madison hack was an inside job: John McAfee

The Ashley Madison hack was an inside job, perpetrated by a woman, according to an eccentric security expert.

John McAfee, the founder of the first antivirus software company, claims that evidence from the data dump that included all of Ashley Madison's users show that the information was stolen by someone inside the office.

The huge size of the dump, and the fact that it included information such as the arrangement of the company's office, shows that it was taken by someone inside of the office, according to McAfee. "From the data that was released, it was clear that the perpetrator had intimate knowledge of the technology stack of the company (all the programs being used)," he wrote in a column for the International Business Times.

The claims correspond with experts' analysis of previous major cyberattacks. The Sony Hack, for instance, has been said to have likely originated with a disgruntled ex-employee with access to the company's computers, taking the information as revenge or for personal gain.

But the second part of McAfee's claims are likely to prove more controversial.

McAfee also claims that the person who stole the information was a "lone female employee". He said that he had worked that out on the basis of social engineering.

That included the fact that the hacker called men "scumbags" in the initial release — a word he said is only ever used by women about men — and that since the manifesto made reference to Valentine's Day, it must have been written by a woman.

"In describing one of [the first two men named in the manifesto] the perpetrator states the he 'spitefully' joined Ashley Madison the day after Valentine's Day. Anyone who ever had a significant other knows that women rate Valentine's Day higher than Christmas, and men think so little of it that they have to remind each other the day is nearing.

"To call an act the day after Valentines Day "spiteful", is a thought that would enter few men's minds. If this does not convince you then you need to get out of the house more often."
 
escapefromstress said:
But the second part of McAfee's claims are likely to prove more controversial.

McAfee also claims that the person who stole the information was a "lone female employee". He said that he had worked that out on the basis of social engineering.

That included the fact that the hacker called men "scumbags" in the initial release — a word he said is only ever used by women about men — and that since the manifesto made reference to Valentine's Day, it must have been written by a woman.

"In describing one of [the first two men named in the manifesto] the perpetrator states the he 'spitefully' joined Ashley Madison the day after Valentine's Day. Anyone who ever had a significant other knows that women rate Valentine's Day higher than Christmas, and men think so little of it that they have to remind each other the day is nearing.

"To call an act the day after Valentines Day "spiteful", is a thought that would enter few men's minds. If this does not convince you then you need to get out of the house more often."

There does seem to be some circumstantial evidence that it could've been a female.
 
THE ASHLEY MADISON HACK REVEALS WHICH CITIES CHEAT THE MOST

São Paulo tops the charts with a whopping 374,542 accounts, over 100,000 more than the next-highest city, New York (268,171); Sydney, meanwhile, rounds out the top three with 251,813.

Other cities in the top 25 include Houston (186,795), Madrid (135,294), and Miami (109,505), and while Las Vegas barely made it on the list (with only 87,720 accounts), it's surprising anyone needs a website to be unfaithful in Sin City.

Don't be surprised if these numbers aren't reflective of the actual amount of active users on the site, though, since Ashley Madison's been accused of creating thousands of fake female profiles in the past. A cheater's website accused of fudging the numbers: who'da thunk it?

Check out the full list below:

https://www.thrillist.com/travel/nation/ashley-madison-data-leak-world-cities-with-most-users
 
Man Sues Ashley Madison for $5 Million Saying it Tricked Him Into Flirting with ‘An Army of Female Bots’

Ashley Madison, the website for cheaters is once again in the news. And as always for bad reasons. An Ashley Madison users, David Poyet has filed a Class Action Suit against Madison parent company Avid Life Media for allegedly duping users into signing up for the service by employing an “army of fembots.” For his hardships, Poyet is demanding Avid Life pay him $5 million.

Courthouse News Service reported that the former Ashley Madison user, Poyet, has filed the case saying that he was tricked by Ashley Madison into believing he was interacting with beautiful females while all the time he was interacting with ‘an army of fembots.’ He says that he came to know that they were fembots or female robot users only after the hack attack and subsequently stolen data was leaked by the Impact Team.

“Ashley Madison went to extreme measures to fraudulently lure in and profit from customers,” Poyet’s complaint reads. “Defendants’ fraudulent and deceitful actions include, but are not limited to: Marketing that the site had 5.5 million female profiles, when only a small percentage of the profiles belonged to actual women who used the site; hiring employees whose jobs were to create thousands of fake female profiles; and creating over 70,000 female bots to send male users millions of fake messages.”

Ashley Madison had created a lot of female profiles that are basically robot users that send users flirtatious messages and entice them to spend money on credits to respond to them. When this was revealed by Gizmodo, Avid Life denied that it intentionally tricked users into flirting with robots and has said that “criminal elements” were creating fake profiles on the site and that it would refund any users who paid to flirt with fake profiles.

Coming back to Poyet’s case, the road to $5 million seems to be a tough one for him. The problem is that the Ashley Madison terms of service clearly state that the users might encounter fembots during their visit to the site. Seems like Poyet will have to return empty handed from the court.

https://www.techworm.net/2015/11/ma...-tricking-him-into-flirting-with-fembots.html
 
Back
Top Bottom