Made with Love
Status
Not open for further replies.
1508633_839155189464055_7339030573045450856_n.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 21joh77.jpg
    21joh77.jpg
    42.8 KB · Views: 15
I think they're probaby terrorists or other groups with their own agenda who are trying to grab the spotlight and take advantage of the mayhem.
 
Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson, who fatally shot 18-year-old Michael Brown, resigns




FERGUSON, Mo. — The white police officer who killed Michael Brown has resigned from the Ferguson Police Department, his attorney said Saturday, nearly four months after the fatal confrontation with the black 18-year-old that fueled protests in the St. Louis suburb and across the U.S.

Darren Wilson, 28, has been on administrative leave since the shooting on Aug. 9. His resignation was announced Saturday by one of his attorneys, Neil Bruntrager. The resignation is effective immediately, Bruntrager said. He declined further immediate comment but said he would release more details Saturday night.


The attorney for the Brown family, Benjamin Crump, did not immediately return phone and email messages seeking comment.


Wilson told the St. Louis Post-Dispatch newspaper he was stepping down out of his “own free will” after the police department told him it had received threats of violence if he remained an employee.


“I’m not willing to let someone else get hurt because of me,” he told the newspaper.
A grand jury spent more than three months reviewing evidence in the case before declining in November to issue any charges against Wilson. He told jurors that he feared for his life when Brown hit him and reached for his gun.


 
Prim0 said:
I am so sick and tired of this double standards argument! Minorities had it different, whites had it different, women had it different....every single person has had a differnt experience. I will grant you that there are incidents of racism in America. Will you grant that it hasn't been perpetrated by ever single caucasian? Will you grant that it hasn't happened to every single black?


It is not justice to prosecute people who have committed no crime. Seek out the individual incidents of racism and I will back you on the full prosecution of the perpetrators. But there is no justice for making a single innocent person suffer for any reason because of actions of individuals from their same group!

If all white policemen are bad because of the actions of a few, the I make the argument that all black males are bad because of the actions of black rioters and those who play the knockout game. I say that every single hispanic/latino should be prosecuted as those who have entered the nation illegally. I think every man is therefore, guilty of rape! Every woman is guilty of adultery...and on and on and on!

Why can't anyone seem to understand that any form of group-think is just wrong. Everyone who says they fight for equal rights should be able to admit that ANY kind of general statements about a race, gender, etc. is self-defeating! Why can't people just look at individual instances and judge them and those involved for what they are. What rioters and many in the race business seem to want is revenge, not justice.

Each and every person should have the same exact rights. There should not be any preference shown in any way shape or form for race, gender, ethnicity, religious beliefs, sexual preferences, etc. Everyone is an individual, endowed with the same rights as humans...period!


Well said
 
Prim0 said:
Thanks Papa....but I'm shocked at how many people I deal with can't seem to see it that way.

The problem is people buy into the idea of the haves and have nots.

What they fail to see is people make choices and welfare is slavery.
 
Miss Jessica Lee said:
READ:


https://www.snopes.com/politics/crime/shawnspall.asp


Some of you should reserve judgement before jumping to conclusions...Get all the facts before you start to speak/write::rolleyes:


Origins: On 9 December 2014, a Facebook user named Shawn Spall posted a video purporting to be footage of Mike Brown (the teenager shot and killed by Officer Darren Wilson in Ferguson, Missouri) brutally assaulting a much older man over the theft of a backpack. The source of the video was not disclosed by its original poster, and later the same day that user either removed or restricted the video after it had been shared tens of thousands of times.


Subsequently, several copies (with explicit language) of the video were re-posted to YouTube (as seen in the "Example" block above). After the originally circulated clip was deleted by its original poster, users who had shared the video mistakenly assumed it had been deliberately deleted by Facebook in an attempt to conceal the truth:
WOW FACEBOOK TOOK DOWN THE PRIVATE HOME VIDEO I HAD ON MY PAGE OF MIKE BROWN BEATING AN OLD MAN AND ROBBING HIM OF HIS BACKPACK! IT'S HAS MYSTERIOUSLY DISAPPEARED OFF EVERYONE'S PAGE THAT SHARED IT. I REMEMBER OVER 30,000 SHARES AS OF YESTERDAY AROUND 5PM CST WHEN i FIRST SHARED IT.


WE NEED TO ASK OURSELVES, WHY WOULD FACEBOOK WANT THIS KID TO BE SEEN AS A MARTYR? WHY WOULD THEY SENSOR THIS INFORMATION? WE ARE BOMBARDED EVERYDAY BY JIHAD VIDEOS AND STUPID PET TRICKS BUT WE CAN'T SHOW THE TRUTH ABOUT A PUNK THAT IS BEING HELD AS A CIVIL RIGHTS HERO? YOU SUCK FACEBOOK!!!!
However, when a person removes or restricts content that was once publicly available, all shared copies are subject to the new restriction. As such, the original poster (and not Facebook) was responsible for the video's disappearance, and he provided no explanation for its sudden removal.


Still images taken from the grainy video suggested the individual depicted was not Brown. Mike Brown stood at between 6'4" and 6'5", and even at 18 was uncommonly tall among American men. The person depicted in the circulating footage does not appear to be nearly as tall as Brown was, by a good margin:






Skin tone is difficult to compare in general (particularly in lower resolution footage), but the person in the "Mike Brown video" appeared to have a far deeper tone than Brown. As well, the features of the unnamed man in the video (from the brief portions in which his face is visible) look nothing like Brown's, and the person in the video has pierced ears (Brown did not):




The footage seen here was originally posted to the Internet back in 2012, when Brown was just 16, under original title "only in Woodland City." The video was apparently taken at a large apartment complex in Dallas, Texas (a state in which Mike Brown never lived), called Woodland City Apartments:




The event depicted in the video occurred on 3 September 2012 or earlier:




It's not clear whether Spall was aware of the source when he posted the video.


Since Brown's death in August 2014, several rumors have circulated about him that have later been proved entirely false: one involving his supposed arrest record, another claiming he had gravely injured Officer Darren Wilson, and one displaying a photo of gun-wielding murder suspect Joda Cain that was touted as depicting the "real Mike Brown."


Read more at https://www.snopes.com/politics/crime/shawnspall.asp#0kCryxU4TZPApSKF.99

Good post.
 
Miss Jessica Lee said:
maybe watch the vid paco posted before you criticize my post? thanks :)

clearly that's not Mike Brown in the video. I was merely pointing that out.

Not criticizing...............But Mike Brown died in a clean shooting.
 
Wanker said:

The headline is misleading
Here is the actual story

Police said the man who was killed had pointed a handgun at an officer who was conducting a "routine business check" and had approached two men outside the gas station after 11 p.m. (0500 GMT) in the suburb of Berkeley.
"Fearing for his life, the Berkeley Officer fired several shots, striking the subject, fatally wounding him," St. Louis County Police Department spokesman Brian Schellman said in a statement. The second man fled the scene.
 
[h=1]Foul: Michigan Cops Beat & Kick Handcuffed Man! "You’re Calling Jesus? Don’t You F*cking Dare"[/h]
 
Driver Beaten & Tazed As Police Shut Off Camera

Driver Beaten & Tazed As Police Shut Off Camera

[TABLE="width: 480"]
[TR]
[TD="width: 480"]ST. LOUIS A man has filed a lawsuit against the city's police department after awas turned off by an officer.

The man arrested, Cortez Bufford, is claiming excessive force.
St. Louis police say they pulled over Bufford and a passenger on April 10, 2014, after his car matched a description to a shots fired call.

Police say they tried to get him out of the car, but he did not comply.

You can hear a man screaming and see a struggle ensue in the police dash cam video. A few officers kick Bufford as he continues to fight back, then an officer uses a taser on him.

They are on the ground for nearly two minutes when you hear an officer say, "we are red right now," which means the camera is on, and then the camera shuts off.

"Hold up, everybody hold up, we are red right now, so if you guys are worried about the cameras just wait," the unidentified officer said.

Bufford's attorney said there was no reason for the police to pull over his client, and no reason for officers to kick him.

"You watch the foot go back and the foot go forward, now I think you can go to the police academy for a long time before they say the right move is to kick they guy," said Bevis Schock.

During the struggle police found a 9mm pistol, 5 live rounds, and marijuana on Bufford.

A city representative said the officer that turned off the camera violated department policy and has been disciplined.

Bufford was charged with resisting arrest, along with drug and gun possession, but those charges were later dropped.

Brian Millikan, attorney for the St. Louis Police Officers Association, represented four officers during the internal investigation.

"The officers followed the use of force continuum," Millikan said. "They took the suspect into custody with the minimal force that was necessary that evening."

Police say it was inconclusive if Bufford and the passenger were involved in the original shots fired call.
The St. Louis Metropolitan Police department did not have a comment, but forwarded inquiries to the mayor's office.

The St. Louis Circuit Attorney's office of Jennifer Joyce says they don't normally discuss why a case has been dismissed because once it is, it becomes a closed record.

The office, however, released the following statement:

"Just as in every case, the Circuit Attorney's Office continued an investigation into the incident regarding Cortez Bufford after charges were filed. As standard procedure, prosecutors requested a copy of the police dash-cam video, which was not available at the time of the initial warrant application.

"Several prosecutors reviewed the video and were concerned to see the intentional deactivation of the dash-cam video.

The office immediately reported this concern to the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department's Internal Affairs Division and to the sergeant of the officer involved.

"Additionally, prosecutors conducted a separate review to determine if any police conduct depicted on the video rose to the level of criminal activity. The review process included thorough interviews of the officers present during the incident.

Subsequently, the Circuit Attorney's Office concluded the conduct did not violate Missouri law. In August 2014, the office dismissed charges against Mr. Bufford."
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
One cop yells `Hold up, everybody hold up, we are red right now, so if


you guys are worried about the cameras just wait`
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom