Made with Love

Big Pharma profiteering gone wild

Mason

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 20, 2014
Messages
236
Can we jail these thieves?.

(NaturalNews) The financial raping of America by Big Pharma has just achieved a new milestone with the impending launch of a Hepatitis C drug that costs $1,000 a pill. If you've ever wondered why U.S. health care is so unaffordable and inaccessible -- and why health insurance costs are bankrupting businesses and municipalities across the nation -- this is exactly why. The same drug that sells for $1,000 a pill in the USA -- named "Sovaldi" -- sells for just $10 in Egypt, or 1/100th the USA price.

Drug companies are, of course, granted FDA-enforced monopolies on the treatment of anything considered a "disease." As such, drugs are pushed into the marketplace at monopoly prices. Because if you're the CEO of Gilead Sciences, Inc., makers of the Sovaldi drug to be sold at $1,000 a pill, your job is to maximize revenues by any means necessary. When you're handed a monopoly by the FDA, the strategy for achieving that is simple: Raise the price to whatever you can get away with, then bill the insurance companies, Medicare and Medicaid for $100, $500 or even $1,000 a pill.

[h=1]100,000% mark-up?[/h]Even if one pill of Sovaldi only costs 68 cents to manufacture, it will still be sold at $1,000 a pill because that's what the company demands. At this price, a course of treatment runs $84,000 in the USA. Gilead reduces the price to $57,000 in the UK -- apparently in a completely arbitrary manner based on whatever it can get for the drug rather than the drug's actual cost or value.

How much does this drug actually cost to produce? Consider this shocking fact, as :

Gilead confirmed that it had agreed to supply the new drug in Egypt - which has the world's highest prevalence of the virus due to use of contaminated needles in the 1970s - at around $900 for a 12-week course of therapy, or about 1 percent of the U.S. price.

Yep, the same drug sold in the USA for $84,000 is sold in Egypt for $900 -- and the company still makes a profit!

What we are likely looking at with this drug is something approaching a 100,000% mark-up. In any other industry, that would be called "profiteering."

[h=1]Modern medicine exists to enrich big business, not to make people healthy[/h]The entire U.S. health care system is, of course, set up to fill the coffers of big business. That's why U.S. health care ("sick care") is the most expensive in the world, by far, even though it produces poor overall results. More people are sick, obese and diseased in America today than at any other time in human history, yet we are all paying more for health insurance coverage. Why is that?

The honest answer is that we are paying higher and higher prices for drugs that simply don't work. At the same time, the FDA and Big Pharma are systematically discrediting natural cures that are safe, effective and affordable. Hepatitis C, for example, can readily be treated with plant-based bioflavonoids called catechin and naringenin, both of which are entirely non-toxic and have been scientifically proven to kill the Hepatitis C virus.

You can buy a lot of green tea and citrus fruits for the $84,000 cost of a drug treatment. In fact, you could buy and juice organic produce for years with that much money, and the juicing protocol would help prevent cancer, heart disease and diabetes at the same time, dramatically lowering overall health care costs.

But that's never been the goal of health care. There is no incentive for anyone to lower costs. Every incentive, in fact, is based on raising costs so that revenues and profits can be raised, too.

Anyone who expects the health care industry to lower its own costs is expecting the impossible. No for-profit business sector ever seeks to shrink in size and revenues.

[h=1]Profits for the few, sickness for the masses[/h]Why does the pharmaceutical industry push $1,000-a-pill drug treatments rather than affordable, safe and effective natural protocols like juicing and superfoods? Because, of course, the drugs make the most money.

The entire "sick care" industry is driven by profits rather than any real desire to help humanity. As a result, whatever makes the most money gets pushed onto the most patients. The billing for all this gets shoved over to health insurance companies which must then raise insurance rates to insane levels to cover all the ridiculously-high-priced drugs.

And that's how we end up with families paying $5,000 - $10,000 a year for health insurance coverage. In a system driven by pure greed, nobody gets healthy and everybody gets financially raped one way or another.

Trust me when I say America's economy will continue to implode as long as we allow this parasitic, monopolistic health care system to rape us all of our incomes, investments and small business profits. The main reason why U.S. companies are closing their doors and firing workers is because they can't afford to pay the exorbitant health insurance premiums!

https://www.naturalnews.com/044463_Big_Pharma_profiteering_Sovaldi_overpriced_drugs.html
 
No they own a monopoly and have better lawyers.

Can we jail these thieves?.
 
Does Viagra really costs $14 per pop. No maybe 50 cents to make but don't see the limpy guys complaining.
 
Just because it only takes a few bucks to produce the pill now doesn't mean that millions and millions of dollars weren't put into the research that got the company to the successful product. You forget that they finance their own labs and lots of university labs looking to find cures. For each success, there are probably a thousand projects that went nowhere. These companies risk large amounts to research and develop drugs...then have to hope the FDA will allow them to sell it.

I'm also willing to bet that the low price in Egypt has more to do with some kind of government subsidies by the Egyptian government than a flat out different price for the Egyptian patients. And if so, those of you who think we should take from the rich to give to the poor should be supportive. The companies are charging rich countries more so the prices can be affordable to the poor countries.

I am not so blind as to think that pharma companies aren't doing all they can to make a profit...but I'm okay with that...that is the point of companies. If you want something for nothing, or for an organization to run at a loss, the what you are looking for is probably a charity.

One positive thing that happened was when it became illegal for the pharmaceutical companies to wine and dine Doctors so they can prescribe their own drugs vs the no name cheaper drugs that worked just the same.
 
I am one of the last to justify some of big pharma's actions, but PrimO has an important point. It costs millions and millions to develop a drug (keep in mind only about 1 in 100 actually make it through to testing), then there's all the clinical trials (which cost tens of millions), then the certification process with government (costs more millions), then advertising (medical and mainstream) which costs millions. IN the end, getting a new drug to market, regardless of how important and wonderful it is, takes years and hundreds of millions of dollars.

Big pharma are public companies: their shareholders expect profit. They don't expect their company execs to give away drugs that cost hundreds of millions "to save lives" at the cost of losing their share value (sorry, reality, folks!). Drugs cost what they cost because of the R&D expenses plus the shareholder returns. Costs vary depending on market, so someone in Uganda gets a drug for $1 that we pay $100 for simply because that's what the market sustains and big pharma would rather recoup a little than none.

Altruism doesn't work in a capitalist market. If you want big pharma to not make a profit, then where's the incentive to develop new drugs? The government can't afford the process, and in fact adds tens of millions in costs to any drug approval process.
 
One positive thing that happened was when it became illegal for the pharmaceutical companies to wine and dine Doctors so they can prescribe their own drugs vs the no name cheaper drugs that worked just the same.

The wine and dine came about as a way of educating doctors who are just too busy to read all the literature, and to prevent "buying" prescriptions. Think it's just doctors? Ever been given a freebie at Costco or Loblaws? What do you think they are doing?

Doctors will almost always prescribe a generic over a name brand, when the option exists, because we actually do care about the patients and the costs. But there are not always generics, and there are times a generic is the wrong choice (liability, risky processes, etc).
 
Back
Top Bottom