Cupid's Pictures of their Escorts... Good or Bad? Should they get a new style?

[Mufasa]

Is it just me or are the pictures of the girls at Cupid's really not that great?

Seriously, when I go to Cupid's site I take a look at all their ladies and none of them stand out to me, which I know is unbelievable because there is such a large selection. It would be unreasonable to think that none of them would catch my eye. But for me this seems to be the case, I definitely will chalk this up to the pictures not sparking that bulge in my pants that we all can no doubt get from the pictures of girls at places like Dreammakers, which in my opinion has the best pictures in the biz (despite the sometimes unnecessary level of photoshopping).

I'm just wondering if anyone else sees the same problem as me when browsing for escorts through Cupid's. I'm absolutely positive that if she hired the guy from Dreammakers to do a complete makeover (makeover of picture style not makeover of picture photoshopping) her girls pics, I would no doubt be dying to bang at least half of Cupid's girls.

Anyone else want to add to that?


Don't forget to vote "new style of pictures" for Cupid's if you agree with my comments.

 

[Butch]

I voted yes but maybe Cupid's pictures are the most trustworthy?.

 

[-b]

Maybe you need glasses......
Even being a woman the pics turn me on with or without my glasses..:anangel:

 

[LickingGravity]

I think the style is fine I would like them to ensure there aren't any misleading ones in there. I know of at least one for sure where there is a material difference between photograph and reality.

 

[Coxwell]

I like their style of photos, they have the best looking women of all the agencies as well.

On a tangent, their price should be lower since they don't have the overhead of an incall, having a driver is pretty cheap. If the extra money went to the girls, I wouldn't mind.

 

[Macho Man]

I like their style of photos, they have the best looking women of all the agencies as well.

So far the voting is 10-2 against you

 

[Mufasa]

I voted yes but maybe Cupid's pictures are the most trustworthy?.

I want to agree, but I havn't seen any of the girls from Cupid's so I wouldn't be able to comment. But from what I can see there is no photo editing at all so my guess is that is very true.

 

[Mufasa]

Maybe you need glasses......
Even being a woman the pics turn me on with or without my glasses..:anangel:

Whoa, take it easy. My 20/20 vision is hurting off your comment.

 

[tboy]

I can honestly say I have seen plenty of cupid's ladies over the years and their photos are not retouched in any way...least those that I've seen (and there's been tons!).

I like their style since they usually give a front, side and bum view, tastefully, without any flowery distractions. I mean it's nice to see a bed shot for example, but I'm not shopping for a bed, bar stool, kitchen counter, couch etc, I want to see what the lady looks like and they do that just fine.

Further to that, I find the beaver shots arousing, but IMO to me, they are not necessary in order for me to be interested in booking a lady.

 

[Mufasa]

The voting in favor of Cupid's to change their photograph style is pretty one sided so far at 11-2. Perhaps what I'm saying has merit after all.

I wonder if Jillian would have anything to say here? No doubt her comments would be more than welcome if she is interested in refining her agency website.

 

[Mufasa]

I like their style since they usually give a front, side and bum view, tastefully, without any flowery distractions. I mean it's nice to see a bed shot for example, but I'm not shopping for a bed, bar stool, kitchen counter, couch etc, I want to see what the lady looks like and they do that just fine.

There is something I can agree with. However, I think that Cupid's pictures have significantly less objects in the background compared to places like Roomates, Dreammakers, etc... where you see beds, night stands, lamps, and so on, thus offering more attention to the lady in the picture but I think that is what makes them dull and rather unnattractive. The fact that they are presented like that is boring to me, and possibly to the other 11 people people who voted in favor of Cupid's to change their style. We all know an action scene in a movie is much better with some music, the same idea applies with a picture. In my opinion Cupid's pictures is kinda like a good movie but without a soundtrack. I mean seriously, what would the Rocky movies be like without Survivor, HA, not so great right, haha. I know Cupid's has hot girls, that's not in dispute, but their pictures just don't entice me enough to book one of em.

 

[Guido]

https://cupidsescorts.ca/toronto/index.php

Some of the ladies look hot, I just can't do outcalls or I would book.

 

[Nova5]

https://cupidsescorts.ca/toronto/index.php

Some of the ladies look hot, I just can't do outcalls or I would book.

Ditto!

 

[Clint Ewood]

i think those pics are just fine, i have seen few of those girls(some retired) and pics looked pretty accurate
background objects not that important, rather see accurate pics of the girl...

 

[tboy]

^^^^ exactly. I forget what agency she was with, but there was a shot of a lady on the bed, on all fours, and behind her in the corner were this fine reeds fanned out...well the position of the camera made the base of the "fan" directly in line with her ass....so much it looked like she was having an explosion coming out of her butt lol......

And don't even get me started on Kodak's photos..........

 

[Dan]

I prefer the less touched up shots. At least it's not a let down when the door opens because she looked so perfect in the pictures.

 

[Mufasa]

I prefer the less touched up shots. At least it's not a let down when the door opens because she looked so perfect in the pictures.

You may have actually made my point for me there Dan. Part of what I have been saying is that Cupid's pics don't entice me to book one of their girls. If I ever did book a girl with touched up photos and she came through the door and I was dissappointed as a result, well my response would be that at least she came through my door. Know what I mean? At least I booked her. That's the issue here, Cupid's pics are just not good enough for me to book. I'm not the only one I'm sure. Like I said before the girls are hot thats not in dispute, I just need photos that will motivate me to book em.

Note: i'm not interested in photos with a lot of photoshopping, just ones that are more creative and that are nice to look at. Hiding a tattoo and maybe a bruise or two is fine, but photoshopping stretchmarks and scars is not acceptable. Assembly line escort photos are really not attractive. A good example would be the pics from Vixens compared to Cupids. Cupid's got that black sofa couch with the button pattern and vixens got the fireplace with the candles and stuff in the background, plus they play with the lighting a little bit. IMHO Vixens looks better than Cupid's (though I think every agency pics look better than Cupid's- no offense).

 

[train]

I guess I have a somewhat opposite point. It was precisely one of their pictures which caused me to book one of their ladies. Great body and six-pack abs. Unfortunately the lady that showed up, while obviously the same person, was at least 30 lbs heavier. Claimed the pictures were slightly out of date.

 

[Coxwell]

So far the voting is 10-2 against you

18-8 now. :wink:
Does this mean I should change my vote? Are you one of those guys who leaps on the bandwagon just so they can say they support a winner?

I like the minimal background and artistic poses that Cupids uses, it's like their brand or trademark. But more than that I think they have the most attractive ladies.

 

[tboy]

I don't doubt their ladies are hot, I just don't think I'll ever find out unless they start taking better pictures, lol, kinda like the one I put in my signature....oooooohhhhh godddddd, its sooooo good. Yummy

wait, you mean a "better" picture is not just of the lady, but of nicer backgrounds? I mean really dude, you're not going to see them in THAT background so what difference does it make? Or are you saying you like to be distracted by showy backgrounds so you can't see the lady's flaws? (like most car commercials).....

I don't get it. You want to see better photos but their photos show nothing but the lady in question now....

Anyhow, not for nothing but most of cupids ladies who are booked on, get booked up real quick so I don't think they'll miss you if you don't book......