Domestic Violence Goes Bad When A Bootleg Pimp Tries To Beat Up His Prostitute

[PokerFace]

 

[Slick]

That will show him. The dude cannot even get up :biggrin:

 

[Maximiliano]

 

[a 1 player]

She threw him around like a rag doll! :biggrin:

 

[a 1 player]

I would have knocked her the fuck out. I don't give a rats ass if she is a woman or not.

 

[tboy]

I would have knocked her the fuck out. I don't give a rats ass if she is a woman or not.

don't say that, bliss will be all over you too lol...

This is a perfect example of a situation where I too would hit her once, so hard her next of kin would feel it. And you know what? Without the video the guy would go to jail......

As for that wannbe pimp.....that woman has a hell of a lot more self-control than I do. I would have knocked him into next tuesday.......

One thing I've learned: if you get someone down, put em down permanantly. (ie: so they won't be getting up on their own). If you don't? Like that video, he said he wouldn't hit her then what did he do? Tried to hit her.....

 

[a 1 player]

I live my life in peace, using only words, logic and reason to make my points and state my opinions. That is not to say I have never had an all out verbal fight... I've had a few of those. I expect others to do the same when they are with me. A swing not just once, but a prolonged attack especially, a person has the RIGHT to defend them self.

 

[Trump]

She is one little lady that deserves a good upper cut and I don't say that to often. You are right Tboy he would have gone to jail without the video and the poor guy took it all without throwing one punch.

 

[a 1 player]

She is one little lady that deserves a good upper cut and I don't say that to often. You are right Tboy he would have gone to jail without the video and the poor guy took it all without throwing one punch.

He should hire the woman from the top video for payback. :biggrin::biggrin:

 

[tboy]

I live my life in peace, using only words, logic and reason to make my points and state my opinions. That is not to say I have never had an all out verbal fight... I've had a few of those. I expect others to do the same when they are with me. A swing not just once, but a prolonged attack especially, a person has the RIGHT to defend them self.

Sorry, we may have that right but exercise it and you'll end up in the back of a police car, especially if the other party is female. I mean hell, we let gun runners and drug dealers off with a stern lecture but, gasp, strike a woman even in self defence? LOL (case in point is that shopkeeper who caught the thief and detained him until the police arrived and then was arrested himself and the thief let go for testimony).

Now in the states, you see on the show Cops women getting arrested all the time for domestic battery but up here? In our 100% pc country? NOT.

I am one to use words more often than fists but more than a few times in my life it's come to that. I've taken a few beatings and dished out a few as well. Hence where I learned "don't let them up once you get em down".....I've got a nice scar over my left eye that is testimount to that....

If anyone takes a swing at me they better connect because the shit is about to hit the proverbial fan.

 

[a 1 player]

[h=1]Self Defense and the Canadian Criminal Code:[/h] Below is how self defense is defined by the Canadian Criminal Code: Defense of Person
Self-Defence Against Unprovoked Assault
... / Extent of justification.
34. (1) Every one who is unlawfully assaulted without having provoked the assault is justified in repelling force by force if the force he uses is not intended to cause death or grievous bodily harm and is no more than is necessary to enable him to defend himself.
(2) Every one who is unlawfully assaulted and who causes death or grievous bodily harm in repelling the assault is justified if
(a) he causes it under reasonable apprehension of death or grievous bodily harm from the violence with which the assault was originally made or with which the assailant pursues his purposes; and
(b) he believes, on reasonable grounds, that he cannot otherwise preserve himself from death or grievous bodily harm. [R.S. c.C-34, s.34.] Self-Defence In Case Of Aggression.

35. Every one who has without justification assaulted another but did not commence the assault with intent to cause death or grievous bodily harm, or has without justification provoked an assault on himself by another, may justify the use of force subsequent to the assault if
(a) he uses the force
(i) under reasonable apprehension of death or grievous bodily harm from the violence of the person whom he has assaulted or provoked, and
(ii) in the belief, on reasonable grounds, that it is necessary in order to preserve himself from death or grievous bodily harm;
(b) he did not, at any time before the necessity of preserving himself from death or grievous bodily harm arose, endeavour to cause death or grievous bodily harm; and
(c) he declined further conflict and quitted or retreated from it as far as it was feasible to do so before the necessity of preserving himself from death or grievous bodily harm arose. [R.S. c.C-34, s.35.] Provocation.
36. Provocation includes, for the purposes of sections 34 and 35, provocation by blows, words or gestures. [R.S. c.C-34, s.36.]
Preventing Assault
... / Extent of justification.
37. (1) Every one is justified in using force to defend himself or any one under his protection from assault, if he uses no more force than is necessary to prevent the assault or the repetition of it.
(2) Nothing in this section shall be deemed to justify the wilful infliction of any hurt or mischief that is excessive, having regard to the nature of the assault that the force used was intended to prevent. [R.S. c.C-34, s.37.]

Reference:

 

[tboy]

Hey I quoted that same part to Fuji over at "the other board" but as we all know, the law is not applied correctly or fairly in all instances. (I have a copy of the CCofC saved to my favourites.

A prime example is the reaction I got when I openly stated in the other thread about hitting a woman. The automatic response is "bastard" whether she provoked it, or started it or whatever.

 

[a 1 player]

Just to clarify here, I never said that hitting a woman is alright, just that one has the right to defend themself regardless of who the attacker is. In a situation like the one above where one cannot retreat a mild push or shove is likely to elevate the situation and not deter it.

 

[Dan]

I wouldn't mess with either lady, I hate to admit it but they are 2 tough women that would probably kick my ass

 

[tboy]

Just to clarify here, I never said that hitting a woman is alright, just that one has the right to defend themself regardless of who the attacker is. In a situation like the one above where one cannot retreat a mild push or shove is likely to elevate the situation and not deter it.

I see playa is doing his fred astaire imitation....anyone else hear "singing in the rain" in the background? :biggrin:

 

[a 1 player]

I see playa is doing his fred astaire imitation....anyone else hear "singing in the rain" in the background? :biggrin:

I must be a tad slow today, as I just don't get the reference. Damn.

 

[Jesus Quintana]

I suspect that T is referring to "Singing in the Rain" in its original version, not the "Clockwork Orange" version.

If I was the dude in the train after laughing at the girl for a couple of moments if she didn't stop I'd do what an Italian buddy of mine would do:
Lift his right hand across his body and tell her "I'll give you such a FUCKING BACKHAND..." If she insisted then she'd get it.
Sorry, not PC but fuck it. I'm not some chick's punching bag.

 

[tboy]

I must be a tad slow today, as I just don't get the reference. Damn.

dodging the issue aka dancing around it aka tap dancing aka singing in the rain with fred astaire (a well known singer).

You posted: "I never said hitting a woman is all right" (in reality you pulled a bliss and said alright but I corrected you) so you're getting the "omfg don't ever hit a woman" pc crowd

Then you negate that statement with: "one has the right to defend themselves no matter who the attacker is" meaning that it IS in fact all right to hit a woman if she's attacking you.

That SO sounds like something a politician would say. You know, saying what needs to be said without actually saying it.....

 

[a 1 player]

Okay, on board again. Thanks. I know who Fred Astaire is, just my rational thinking phased out for a bit.

Fuck the politically correct crowd, I think you know me better than that. To anti-politician-ize myself so I do not sound like a contradiction and give a firm answer...

If ANYONE (woman or not) attacks me, I will use my right to self defense. Hitting anyone is never alright, UNLESS it is in self defense, then I hope I knock them the fuck out. Is that clear?

 

[tboy]

clear as a bell....or a ding a ling (and you know who I mean lol)