Marriage, why we should allow gay marriages.

[BEER]

I was watching a comedy show last night and he had this line that had me on the floor LOL.


"Why are we so against gay people getting married?'


Let them feel the pain we do after a few years. Lawyers' fees, no I don't like kissing anymore, We've lost that spark, you are not the same person I married, why are you always watching sports on TV, why you don't take me out anymore...

"Why make it easy on them when they can just break up after a few years without paying the fee?.

No let them pay as we Heteros do :biggrin2:

 

[Baz]

If I must answer question I will. Simply, it is not as it was meant to be. A marriage is the union of two people who love one another and then produce offspring. The latter is impossible to achieve in a gay marriage.

 

[1sickdude]

If I must answer question I will. Simply, it is not as it was meant to be. A marriage is the union of two people who love one another and then produce offspring. The latter is impossible to achieve in a gay marriage.

Why hasn't this Mormon been banned yet?.

 

[Baz]

Why hasn't this Mormon been banned yet?.

Why is it you encourage the removal of freedom of speech? I also do not appreciate being called a Mormon when I'm not, thank you very much! Thank God the powers that be from this forum are more open minded than members like yourself!

 

[NoName]

Why is it you encourage the removal of freedom of speech? I also do not appreciate being called a Mormon when I'm not, thank you very much! Thank God the powers that be from this forum are more open minded than members like yourself!

Do you lick your wife's pussy?.

That will answer all questions.

 

[Baz]

Do you lick your wife's pussy?.

That will answer all questions.

\

That sir is none of your business and your question shows what a Neanderthal you really are!

 

[Blank_Dave]

If I must answer question I will. Simply, it is not as it was meant to be. A marriage is the union of two people who love one another and then produce offspring. The latter is impossible to achieve in a gay marriage.

Would the latter therefore invalidate a marriage should the couple either choose not to, or incapable of, reproducing?

For example, assuming you and Ida do not have children....Would you two still be married by your own standards? As you have not produced offspring?

 

[Blank_Dave]

Do you lick your wife's pussy?.

That will answer all questions.

I'll answer that for Brent, as he refuses to.

"It's dirty down there"

 

[Art Mann]

If I must answer question I will. Simply, it is not as it was meant to be. A marriage is the union of two people who love one another and then produce offspring. The latter is impossible to achieve in a gay marriage.

Producing offspring is also impossible to achieve if one of the hetero partners is impotent, baz. Does that mean their marriage is invalid?

Moreover, in today's overpopulated world with inevitable degradation of lifestyle due to climate warming, pollution, crime, etc, it may very well be the height of moral obligation to not reproduce. Rather, we should be adopting homeless children, providing better lives for those born into third world poverty, etc.

I do agree that marriage is the union of two people who love each other. I also believe love to be the vital centre of common-law marriage, no need to go through the ritual of vows in a church. I fail to see the relevance of gender in this, apart from my own personal hetero preference

I believe that the lesbian couple I consider my friends are doing a wonderful job of providing a healthy family environment for their young son. And the gay male couple who live across the street, choosing to be childless, are a loving couple despite not producing offspring.

While this doesn't apply to me personally, I still do get a chuckle from that tired old joke: "Gay marriage? Why not? Why shouldn't they be entitled to be as miserable as the rest of us?"

 

[Baz]

If I couple unites and finds they cannot have children then it's accepted and it is what it is. It was not planned and therefore beyond anyone's control. At that point other methods such as in vitro fertilization, possibly adoption ect.... I know you are going to follow up with homosexuals can adopt and yes, this is true but then that opens up another conversation all together.

I really don't care if two men or two women choose to live together and share the bedroom but why does it have to come under "marriage"?

 

[Art Mann]

For example, assuming you and Ida do not have children....Would you two still be married by your own standards? As you have not produced offspring?

Good catch, Dave. I don't recall baz ever discussing his role as a parent.

(Of course, I don't recall batman57, the troll living in his mom's basement, ever discussing parenting either):biggrin2:

 

[Baz]

Dave, as I answered Noname I shall answer you. What Ida and myself do in the bedroom is nobodies business but I will say, it's a marvellous experience when two people truly love one another!

 

[Varan]

This Bazerko guy is a weirdo.

 

[Art Mann]

. . . I really don't care if two men or two women choose to live together and share the bedroom but why does it have to come under "marriage"?

So it turns out you have a heart after all, baz. You're willing to let the people be ... and your only concern is the sanctity of an archaic term.

Let's just invent some new ones. For the Lesbian couple, they can enjoy "larriage." And the gay couple, well, obviously they have a "garriage."

Love and Garriage,
Love and Larriage . . .
Goes together like a horse and carriage.

(With all due apologies, Frank.)

 

[Blank_Dave]

If I couple unites and finds they cannot have children then it's accepted and it is what it is. It was not planned and therefore beyond anyone's control. At that point other methods such as in vitro fertilization, possibly adoption ect....

What if they choose not to then?

I know you are going to follow up with homosexuals can adopt and yes, this is true but then that opens up another conversation all together.

Actually no I wasn't going to suggest it. Though to be honest, I fail to see an issue with it. IMO, many children are being raised in single parent/split/broken homes, and as such lack good 'other parent'al models. Or worse they are used as 'weapons' and spies by feuding parent. Personally, I'd much sooner see a child raised in a stable, loving home by gay parents, then to be bounced between two 'homes' at 'war' with each other and the child's caught in the middle.

I really don't care if two men or two women choose to live together and share the bedroom but why does it have to come under "marriage"?

I think that's what people felt 20-30 years ago when couple of mixed races wished to be joined as well.

 

[Baz]

I guess we will agree you are a poet Art and now I will bid you all a very good night, it's time for me to call it a night and please wish me luck I still find my lovely wife wide awake!

 

[Art Mann]

Dave, as I answered Noname I shall answer you. What Ida and myself do in the bedroom is nobodies business but I will say, it's a marvellous experience when two people truly love one another!

I know I'm gonna get shit on by the rightwingers if I quote Trudeau, but I have to agree with you here, baz. The state (or in this case the board) has no business in the bedrooms of the nation. Yours, mine, or anybody else's.

I will also add it's a marvellous experience when two people truly enjoy having sex, whether they are the same gender, or whether they even love one another.

 

[The Authority]

Once my wife stopped kissing me for the last 2 years I knew it was either she was too comfortable with our marriage or she is having an affair. I do not want to ask because I am afraid of her answer.

 

[Blank_Dave]

Dave, as I answered Noname I shall answer you. What Ida and myself do in the bedroom is nobodies business but I will say, it's a marvellous experience when two people truly love one another!

Well you truly can't take a joke now can you?

 

[Art Mann]

Why is it you encourage the removal of freedom of speech? . . . Thank God the powers that be from this forum are more open minded than members like yourself!

Hey, don't pay any attention, baz. He's just one sick dude. And he hasn't been around here long enough to appreciate your entire history. I trust you recall that from the very first thread you started on your join date, while others were calling for your removal I was arguing you should be allowed to stay and post and keep us entertained.

Speaking of entertaining . . . are you and Ida still planning to come to the Christmas party next week?

I, for one, am really looking forward to you seeing you manifest in flesh.