Pedophiles should be locked up without any parole for life.

[-b]

Yup, you've gone off the deep end again lol....ummm 4 or 5 yr old in highschool? what have you been smoking lol......for one thing, intelligence is not necessarily an indicator of maturity. I went to school with some extremely intelligent guys who wouldn't know what to do with a pussy if it didn't come with a training manual.

One thing most here state is "oh so you're saying it is ok to have sex with a...." yeah it IS ok to have sex with a.....but who are you saying is having the sex with a? You? me? a 10 yr old? a 15 yr old? a 30 yr old? As I stated, and if you read the entire thread, yes, it is OK for two 10 yr olds to have sex if they are emotionally mature enough to want to (as long as it is safe and consensual). Yes, it is ok for a emotionally mature 13 yr old to have sex with a comparitively emotionally mature male and it doesn't matter WHAT the age difference is if they have court approval (as I mentioned in a previous post).

And since you are prone to do, let me clarify: I am citing emotional maturity is as an important factor as age. Many (most?) here are fixating on age only yet I have proven that it is not only age that is a determining factor. I mean hell, in some parts of the world a woman is an old maid when she's 16....

Now let's not get so caught up in extremes. The case in point here is of an emotionally retarded 18 yr old teenager having consensual sex with an unknown 13 yr old. Should the kid go to jail? yup and he is in jail. Should he get probation after his jail term? Yes and he did. Should he get councilling so as to learn what he did was wrong? yes and he will. But to hang him or shoot him or ??? is wrong in just about every way......

So tell me tboy how do you measure maturity in children.....Studies have show when girls are 3 or 4 they try to act in a way to make the fathers notice them not their mothers.....Just as intellectual child have are able to do work far advance their age you do not call the mature...or 18 year old doing the same work ate not mature......Yes there are 4 or 5 years in High Schools.....

So you are states Maturity is measure when you are sexual.....When a young child is raped some of them will become sexually to others....are they mature......or is it a case of what has happen....Is this Emotionally Maturity you are stating ....What is Emotional Maturity tboy....they hold an conversation as an adult .....they hold you when you are sad or happy because all child have that.....when you sad they hug you...laugh when you laugh.....

As for the courts .....they stated he went to a religious school and learned women are nothing...
Well if he can lean women are nothing In England I am sure he has seen tv or newspapers stating
Rape Is Illegal.........It like 15 or 18 years old causing destruction to Jewish Property or none whites and saying they went to a White Supremacy School.....

What do they say about Ignorance and the Law........

 

[papasmerf]

does anyone else found it odd the judge let him off because his education taught him women are worthless???


I would imagine that sort of teaching is in direction opposition to British Law.

 

[Jerkthis]

Tboy asked this question

According to you, if I am 17 and a girl I meet is 15 and we have consensual sex, I deserve to be locked up for 20 yrs......THANK GOD YOU'RE NOT A JUDGE OR A COP OR A POLITICIAN

You replied with this answer

or her father
Because you can bet your Immortal Soul you would request the maximum sentence for your crime when you plead guilty.

Therefore I made the assumption.

 

[papasmerf]

Tboy asked this question



You replied with this answer



Therefore I made the assumption.

you did
I suspect so would the 17 year old.

 

[-b]

does anyone else found it odd the judge let him off because his education taught him women are worthless???


I would imagine that sort of teaching is in direction opposition to British Law.

I posted at the same time.....so my answer is there......I think the judge did not want to have
any racial issues after the court case....he was just trying to sweep it under the rug....and
hope the news did not get wind of it......The young man maybe from a religious family who
are important.....

 

[Jerkthis]

you did
I suspect so would the 17 year old.

That you would mete out justice, correct?

 

[Transient]

Since I am not a judge and not fully informed of the U.K. rape statutes and because I did not hear the court testimony first hand, my opinion of the sentencing is of no consequence. I am pointing out that the law appears to not be black-and-white and it is not an abuse of power for the judge to take into consideration conditions that may have been left out of the news report. Not that news reports can be wrong or biased in any way.

What I do feel is consensual or non-consensual sex with a 13 year old, is morally and ethically wrong. That is based on my upbringing and the laws at this location, at this time in history.

 

[papasmerf]

That you would mete out justice, correct?

now did I say that?

 

[Jerkthis]

I posted at the same time.....so my answer is there......I think the judge did not want to have
any racial issues after the court case....he was just trying to sweep it under the rug....and
hope the news did not get wind of it......The young man maybe from a religious family who
are important.....

If this is true then I agree the judge was wrong. Guilt should not be based on someone's religious beliefs. He's living in another country he follows the laws of the country, regardless of religion.

On the other hand if he's 18 having consensual sex with a 15 year old regardless of sex I think the law is wrong in passing judgement. If he's over 20 my opinion changes depending on the circumstance, that being, was he led to believe the person was of age or did he know she or he was a minor?

 

[papasmerf]

I posted at the same time.....so my answer is there......I think the judge did not want to have
any racial issues after the court case....he was just trying to sweep it under the rug....and
hope the news did not get wind of it......The young man maybe from a religious family who
are important.....

you are likely more on target with that assessment than anyone else here.

 

[thesun]

Ok, where is the law to protect boys? So what the law is stating is that it is illegal for a 13 yr old girl to have sex but if she does, they will only charge the boy involved......what kind of fucked up situation is that?[/QUOTE]

Yes it is quite fucked up! All children should be protected regardless of their gender.

 

[papasmerf]

Ok, where is the law to protect boys? So what the law is stating is that it is illegal for a 13 yr old girl to have sex but if she does, they will only charge the boy involved......what kind of fucked up situation is that?

Yes it is quite fucked up! All children should be protected regardless of their gender.[/QUOTE]

does the law state a gender bias??

 

[thesun]

Keep in mind, the law may be devoid of emotional feelings but judges are human beings which are prone to be conflicted with the law and their personal feelings. When someone tells me a judge is capable of putting aside his or her feelings for the sake of following the law is a bit of a joke.

 

[thesun]

Yes it is quite fucked up! All children should be protected regardless of their gender.

does the law state a gender bias??[/QUOTE]

...and to answer your question....Oh defenitely yes!

 

[papasmerf]

Keep in mind, the law may be devoid of emotional feelings but judges are human beings which are prone to be conflicted with the law and their personal feelings. When someone tells me a judge is capable of putting aside his or her feelings for the sake of following the law is a bit of a joke.

so are you saying this particular judge might like child rape?

 

[thesun]

I m saying many of them are bias. I cant comment on this judge as I dont have the full information. Perhaps I m making a generalization here which I feel it's quite true and common. That's my opinion.

 

[tboy]

does anyone else found it odd the judge let him off because his education taught him women are worthless???


I would imagine that sort of teaching is in direction opposition to British Law.

you are wrongfully assuming that as I knew you were right from the start. YOu are missing the entire picture here with your "bias". YOu are taking one particular point and making your entire case out of it.

In this case the kid was taught that women are worthless. He also wasn't taught that what he did was against the law legally and morally. He was also brought up in a segregated manner that didn't allow him to associate with other members of society where he could have learned a more mainstream way of thinking. The judge also considered the fact that the sex was consensual. ALL these points resulted in the sentence he received.

Once again, you are forgetting or ignoring the fact that a) he was found guilty of the crime b) he was senteneced to a period in jail for that crime b) he received probation for the crime he was convicted of and d) he would receive counselling to try and overturn the physcological abuse he was exposed to.

 

[tboy]

you are likely more on target with that assessment than anyone else here.

when you start saying things like that about something Bliss posted that confirms what I assumed all along.......

 

[tboy]

now did I say that?

you don't have to say it, you, me and everyone else here knew exactly what you meant.......

 

[papasmerf]

when you start saying things like that about something Bliss posted that confirms what I assumed all along.......

you have to admit her assessment makes sense and would likely hold water.