Made with Love

Racial profiling by police: Tribunal awards Toronto man $40,000

Anything I say can be used against me.

Yeah, illegal activity. I smoke weed occasionally, I download music, movies, and porn. You need the police to protect you from me?

Oh, and I meet prostitutes. Can't forget that. Unless I'm stopped for speeding or disobeying traffic law, I'm not talking without the presence of a lawyer.

Maynard had every right to do what he did.

You are correct, he did have the right to refuse to answer the police without an attorny present....but the cops also had the right to detain him until they could identify him.......

Let me put it another way: someone rapes your mother... do you want the police to stop and question men matching the description she gave them or do you want their hands to be tied and not stop anybody?
 
it's not my fault you jump on every bandwagon thus you are unable to form your own opinions

Um, ya. ok. Dat makes alot of sense. Now im gonna find a big spliff a weed and take sum huffs so i can tri to understand wat u r sayin so mi mind can be freed and maik my own opinions. cant furget too put on my bob marley shirt either.
 
Um, ya. ok. Dat makes alot of sense. Now im gonna find a big spliff a weed and take sum huffs so i can tri to understand wat u r sayin so mi mind can be freed and maik my own opinions. cant furget too put on my bob marley shirt either.
where did you learn how to talk like that? told ya lay off the crack mon
better_than_drugs_shirt.jpg
 
You are correct, he did have the right to refuse to answer the police without an attorny present....but the cops also had the right to detain him until they could identify him.......

Let me put it another way: someone rapes your mother... do you want the police to stop and question men matching the description she gave them or do you want their hands to be tied and not stop anybody?

I would be even more pissed if they stopped someone else, humiliated him, pointed their firearms at him. Only to discover that it is not him. But this is a good question. Predictable, but good.

Rape is humiliating, Maynard was humiliated. I would want them to find the right man responsible. But not like this. I'm sure if a suspect knew he was being accused of rape then he would offer a DNA sample.

Maynard was not told why he was being questioned. When he asked why, the officer pulled out his gun. Communication is a two-way street, and it ended when the officer brandished his weapon.

This is why I fear cops.
 
I know there are some good cops out there but have seen some nasty ones out there.
 
I would be even more pissed if they stopped someone else, humiliated him, pointed their firearms at him. Only to discover that it is not him. But this is a good question. Predictable, but good.

Rape is humiliating, Maynard was humiliated. I would want them to find the right man responsible. But not like this. I'm sure if a suspect knew he was being accused of rape then he would offer a DNA sample.

Maynard was not told why he was being questioned. When he asked why, the officer pulled out his gun. Communication is a two-way street, and it ended when the officer brandished his weapon.

This is why I fear cops.

dude, how the hell are they going to find him unless they stop ALL men who match his description? I mean think about it...if they only stopped the guilty party, how the hell would they know he was the guilty party??? So I guess you're of the mind that it is better to let the guilty party go scott free, than inconvenience an innocent man? get real......I bet you'd be the first person to bitch in the papers about how the police weren't doing enough....

Now according to the story, the police didn't have a chance to inform maynard why they were stopping him.....they parked at the end of his drive, he got out and approached the police officer...not a good idea at any time......

I would also like to point out that the officer wasn't found guilty of harassing an innocent man, he was found guilty of racial discrimination.......simply because he stopped a black man matching the description of the suspect....
 
dude, how the hell are they going to find him unless they stop ALL men who match his description? I mean think about it...if they only stopped the guilty party, how the hell would they know he was the guilty party??? So I guess you're of the mind that it is better to let the guilty party go scott free, than inconvenience an innocent man?

tboy your idiocity is bewildering, did the cops stop ALL white man looking for Luka Magnotta?


OH YEAH HAVING A GUN POINTED AT YOU IS AN INCONVENIENCE


you'd be pissin in your pants.
 
tboy your idiocity is bewildering, did the cops stop ALL white man looking for Luka Magnotta?


OH YEAH HAVING A GUN POINTED AT YOU IS AN INCONVENIENCE


you'd be pissin in your pants.

1) No, the police didn't stop all white men, they only stopped white men who looked like magnotta get it? But then again, they had a picture of him which is something the cops who stopped maynard didn't have. BTW: the cops didn't stop all black men, they stopped a black man who matched the description of the suspect who also drove a car matching the description of the subject......
2) Yes, having a gun pointed at me is an inconvenince.....did they fire at him? no. Did they hit him with it? no.....did they approach him and point it at his head? no....you see, i've been around firearms all my life and know what they can do. I've had them pointed at me in jest and was more scared then than I would if a cop pointed it at me. Why? Because the cop is a professional and is trained to only fire when he needs to...the person who pointed the rifle at me wasn't and that's how most hunting accidents happen. Rarely do you hear about a cop shooting someone by accidently pulling the trigger.....unlike you who probably would have been shot 4 or 5 times because you'd be waiving your arms in the arm and screaming at them what pigs they are and how you're goiing to get them......
3) No, I wouldn't be pissing in my pants because a) I would never approach a police officer when he tells me to stop and b) I would remain calm and do exactly what the officer told me to do...unlike many people who get shot by the cops.....

See lisa, you're so out to lunch that you have to distort the facts in order to prove your point.......
 
Hey Honeybee

"Smaddy tell mi sey yuh did a chat bout mi."

Please stop with the chat, I will not have sex with you now or ever, not even if it were free or the only way for the human race to exist!

Notice, I said human race and honeybee in the same sentence, what is the world coming to? Don't waste a stand-up, you make me a sammich before your ass gets puts into da Vanier for wayward trollups! Bring me a:
is


&

Roti Sammich!

cuz!


 
1)
2) Yes, having a gun pointed at me is an inconvenince.....did they fire at him? no. Did they hit him with it? .


ok here have a cookie, sorry I don't have time for you today
 
Wow, this thread took me a long time to read. Where's the Prince, we need a coles note version.
 
player stop smoking crack, im not caucasian




how does the "suspect" know that he is a "suspect" that the cops are looking for a black man in a sports car?

He did talk to the cop did he not? Are you saying he wasn't told he might be a suspect? If that was the case where is the claim of racial profiling?
You aren't the most linear thinker are you Lisa? Don't get me wrong not everyone has to think the same way.
 
He did talk to the cop did he not? Are you saying he wasn't told he might be a suspect? If that was the case where is the claim of racial profiling?
You aren't the most linear thinker are you Lisa? Don't get me wrong not everyone has to think the same way.

ohhh bwoy, you like some others in this thread don't read very well ehhhhhhhhh

https://www.thestar.com/news/articl...-by-police-tribunal-awards-toronto-man-40-000

A Toronto police officer violated Ontario’s Human Rights Code when he pursued, then pulled his gun on, an innocent black man driving home from work in a BMW, a tribunal concluded Friday.

The Toronto Police Services Board and police officer Ryan Baker have been ordered to jointly pay Rawle Maynard $40,000 in damages “for injury to dignity, feelings and self-respect” in connection with the “harrowing” November 2005 incident.

Toronto police spokesperson Mark Pugash said the service is seriously considering appealing the decision.
“We are looking very, very closely at this for judicial review,” Pugash said.

“In paragraph 13 of the decision they say, ‘The question before me is not whether the respondents acted reasonably in these difficult circumstances, but whether Mr. Maynard’s race was a factor in their treatment of him.’ They acknowledge that there were difficult circumstances, but they say it doesn’t matter whether the police officers acted reasonably. That is extremely concerning.”
Maynard declined comment through a family member Friday evening.

According to testimony, on the morning of Nov. 25, 2005, Maynard was heading home in a black BMW at the same time Toronto police were investigating a gun call at the Malvern Town Centre. The suspect was a black male driving a black sports car.

Baker, who had been a police officer four years, spotted Maynard and began to follow him. When Maynard pulled into his Scarborough driveway and noted the officer had parked “in close proximity,” he approached the cruiser to find out why the officer was there.

The officer asked where he was coming from. Maynard asked why he was asking. The conversation escalated. Baker pulled out his gun. Other officers arrived on scene and some took out their weapons.
Maynard was forced to his knees and put in the back of a cruiser. At that time, a voice over the police radio said the suspect had been spotted. Maynard was released.
A neighbour who witnessed the incident supported much of Maynard’s account.
In his testimony, Baker denied race played a role in any of the decisions he made that morning.

Maynard told the tribunal the takedown left him “terrified … humiliated in front of his friends and neighbours,” and fearful of police.
In the 60-page decision, adjudicator Leslie Reaume concluded that “I do not believe that if the suspect had been a Caucasian man in the same circumstance, with no other defining characteristics, particularly age …[that the officer] … would have chosen to investigate the first Caucasian man he saw driving the same car at the same intersection.”
 
I think you paint the police force with the same brush and always assume the officer is in the wrong.

Let me save you the trouble

DOT DOT DOT DOT......dot..DOT...DOT
 
I think you paint the police force with the same brush and always assume the officer is in the wrong.

Let me save you the trouble

DOT DOT DOT DOT......dot..DOT...DOT

Me thinks you know nothing much about painting...dodt dot dot duh dot ...I wash my brushes in between :PEACE:
 
Me thinks you know nothing much about painting...dodt dot dot duh dot ...I wash my brushes in between :PEACE:

Ok, let me ask you this

Have you ever had a good experience when dealing with a police officer?
 
Back
Top Bottom