Why they call them curvy instead of fat, overweight and she doesn't take care of herself?

[papasmerf]

 

[bobistheowl]

That's a myth. Larger sized women do not, on average, have vaginas significantly larger than those of smaller women.

 

[Transient]

ASCII smilie, ☺copy/ pasted from MS Word.

You can type those ASCII symbols directly from your keyboard by using the ALT key and entering the ASCII code on your number pad. Just a little shortcut.

 

[papasmerf]

My humor is not always subtle.............sometimes a hole is just a hole and not a euphemism.

 

[bobistheowl]

You can type those ASCII symbols directly from your keyboard by using the ALT key and entering the ASCII code on your number pad. Just a little shortcut.

That's how I make them in MS Word.

The regular smilie is Alt + 1. I know all of the codes from 1-255, because that was the limit in MS Word 2000. After that, they started to repeat after 256, so Alt + 1 and Alt + 257 and Alt + 513 all make the same glyph.

In later versions of Word, there are a whole bunch of additional symbols you can make with the Alt key and numbers larger than 256. Most of them seemed to be Eastern European accented characters that I would never use, so I didn't pursue that very far.

Some symbols, like asymmetrical tits, news anchor, and Fat Elvis:

ۼῧ Ὦ

require the use of the character map, and the selection of a font that contains those symbols.

I pretty much just know the character maps for Tahoma, because it's the one used in Windows file names, and Bookman Old Style, because it has the 'box drawing' glyphs, that also appear in Terminal, the DOS Prompt system font.

I make fonts, so I know most of that stuff, except the Unicode designations for things like 'ellipsis' and 'emdash', for Open Type features. I call in help from someone on a dark net forum, for things like that. There are some glyphs that can be made with the Alt key and number pad, but not with the character map.

Many of the standard European accented characters from Romance languages can be made without the Alt key and number pad, if one is using a European keyboard. I don't have one of those, so I use Alt and number pad, and have chosen not to learn the alternate method.

I just don't know shit about making .gifs efficiently, from images I don't create myself, but I can muddle by. Fonts and symbol insertion, I'm OK on, and I'm not as concerned with economy when it comes to the method.

 

[SillyGirl]

SillyGirl, in the excerpt from your post #155, the typographical error use of the word 'be' twice within four words, ("will be soon be"), suggests correct grammatical construction, in Ebonics.

Keep in mind my custom title, ("Idiot/ Savant"). I find it funny to intentionally view typographical errors as if they are exactly what the poster wanted to say, or to interpret questions or statements as obtusely as possible, when there is any ambiguity whatsoever, for comedic intent, as with the humour of Steven Wright, or Emo Phillips. Much of it is similar to Dennis Miller humour, but with allusions to pop culture and smut, rather than to existential literature and Pliny the Younger.

Effectively, I responded to the quoted eight word excerpt, with little regard to the author or context, with playful, teasing intent. You gave me a 'set up line', that I could use.

There was nothing more to it than that. I am a long time admirer of your wisdom, and have stated that in the past, on another board, where you contribute much less often.

When someone else on that board contracted me privately, in a situation where they were going through a personal dilemma, and were unsure of whom they could trust to give them sound advice, if required, your handle was one of the three to whom I gave a personal endorsement in the PM, along with Madeline Rhodes, and a third.

In another thread post here, I said something like 'there is much to like about SillyGirl, but we're not allowed to put our fingers on it' - That's a reference to your custom title "Can't Touch This", and an old strip club joke, (not my own), from the 'air dance' days, where the patron says to the dancer "There's something about you that I really like, but I can't put my finger on it", with the dual meaning that the dancer has a certain je ne sais quoi appeal, and also that touching was forbidden.

No problem, Bob. Honestly I didn't even realize I had made that typo until just now...a true testament to my exhaustion, as I usually proofread carefully before posting.

I do remember and did appreciate your kind words on that other board. Thank you.

 

[oldguyzer]

That's a myth. Larger sized women do not, on average, have vaginas significantly larger than those of smaller women.

They are proportionately larger.

 

[bobistheowl]

That's a myth. Larger sized women do not, on average, have vaginas significantly larger than those of smaller women.

They are proportionately larger.

Not to anywhere near the scale depicted by the relative penis-to-vagina size metaphor of papasmerf's image. If a woman gained half her body weight, her vagina would not gain evacuated volume proportionally.

Every guy has seen a picture of a farmer with his arm in a cow's vagina, up to the shoulder, and a lot of guys can't get that mental picture out of their heads. An assumption is made that, if the outside is very large and untoned, the inside must be, too. The two do not correlate directly. Just sayin'

 

[Madman]

OMG, I think I seen Peace trying to insert his arm into Bettsie

 

[Transient]

That's how I make them in MS Word.

It works in the Quick Reply text box too.

 

[papasmerf]

That's a myth. Larger sized women do not, on average, have vaginas significantly larger than those of smaller women.



Not to anywhere near the scale depicted by the relative penis-to-vagina size metaphor of papasmerf's image. If a woman gained half her body weight, her vagina would not gain evacuated volume proportionally.

Every guy has seen a picture of a farmer with his arm in a cow's vagina, up to the shoulder, and a lot of guys can't get that mental picture out of their heads. An assumption is made that, if the outside is very large and untoned, the inside must be, too. The two do not correlate directly. Just sayin'

Let me be perfectly clear.

That picture represents A hole, nothing more

 

[Transient]

Let me be perfectly clear.

That picture represents A hole, nothing more

No, I'm sorry papasmerf. You're incorrect.

 

[papasmerf]

No, I'm sorry papasmerf. You're incorrect.

I don't know is that your hole?

 

[User-E]

Let me be perfectly clear.

That picture represents A hole, nothing more

No, I'm sorry papasmerf. You're incorrect.

I must agree with Transient.

 

[User-E]

I don't know is that your hole?

I can read your mind and I know exactly what that hole meant.

 

[papasmerf]

I can read your mind and I know exactly what that hole means.

It means exactly what it is A HOLE!!!!!

 

[papasmerf]

It's really more of a trench than a hole. But there are definitely some a-holes around here though.

:SayWhat?:

 

[User-E]

It means exactly what it is A HOLE!!!!!

If a picture paints a thousand words, there are obviously 999 words besides HOLE we could be thinking of. :writing:

 

[papasmerf]

If a picture paints a thousand words, there are obviously 999 words besides HOLE we could be thinking of. :writing:

Pretty much so just A Hole

 

[Cardinal Fang]

If a picture paints a thousand words, there are obviously 999 words besides HOLE we could be thinking of. :writing:

Yes but none are as ambiguous and open to interpretation as A Hole.