Made with Love
Status
Not open for further replies.
This is 100% correct!!

There's a (stupid) cop at my gym who I sometimes work out with and who brags about how much $$$$ he makes off his court time.

I got another ticket a few weeks ago at the Yonge & Harbour intersection. Its a really fucking stupid traffic law, you cant turn left onto Yonge st. from Harbour st. if you're not in the far left lane (see pics).

Of course its a money making scam. The cop took just 1 minute to write out my ticket, when it usually takes them more then 5 minutes or so. Clearly he was trying to write as many tickets as possible

The green line means you're okay to turn left. The lane with the red line means its illegal to turn left

doaucx.jpg


2unzyj6.jpg

So cops are pre-writing tickets before hand?.
 
So cops are pre-writing tickets before hand?
I wouldnt be surprised if that cop had pre-written all his tickets for that day with location....etc, and all he had to do was just fill in my name and DL number
 
I agree something has to be done but the problem is the city wants the cash and it is a real issue with insurance companies jumping aboard and ringing in the $$$$$.

I went in to fight a speeding ticket I received for going 18 over. The officer had reduced it to only 10 over but of course the insurance company looks at it as a ticket regardless of the speed. I decided I better go in and fight it. I step up to the prosecutor who informs me if I plead not guilty she will be bringing the charge back to 18 over as opposed to 10 over so I better think about it carefully.

I ended up walking out with the charge of 10 over! What a joke!
 
City loses cash when it goes to court, BIG TIME. It's not in the city's best interest for you to challenge the ticket. It is however in the cops best interest financially for you to take it to court. You want to get the city's spending under control, this is one major area that has not been looked at and its rife with abuse.
 
Don't do the crime if you can't do the time comes to mind. Speed kills and the officer's are paid to serve and protect.
 
It's not quotas, its the overtime in court these pricks are after. They are able to pick off individual cars because of the laser's precision unlike the old radar guns.

I still remember the good old days when you could negotiate at the side of the road. Now it's always a court appearance.

court dates 8 months away you got time to think and plead not guilty hope the cop doen't show up
seat belts and talking on the phone are favourites
 
It's not quotas, its the overtime in court these pricks are after
And its not just cops who are fleecing the public, its now also parking ticket officers. They too get paid for overtimne court duty, and the more tickets they write the more OT pay they get:

From todays Star: https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/ar...oronto-drivers-nearly-4-million-in-five-years

Top parking officer single-handedly fined Toronto drivers nearly $4 million in five years




He zips around in a Toronto police ticket mobile, whipping in and out at lightning speed to lay down the law with every bright yellow, you’ve-been-caught slip.
He roams downtown’s northwest neighbourhoods, hitting the hot-spots — coffee shops, grocery stores, restaurants — at the hot times — morning coffee run, lunch hour, afternoon drive-home — to maximize ticket distribution.

He is Zulfiqar Khimani, Toronto’s top parking enforcement officer.
According to data obtained by the Toronto Star, Khimani has issued more tickets than any other parking enforcement officer over the last five years. The hard figures:
• 97,265 tickets issued between January 2008 and August 2012.
• An average of 59 tickets a day, mostly to vehicles in Forest Hill and North Toronto neighbourhoods.
• A total of $3,922,725 in fines for drivers.

The diligent public servant is earning his keep: Khimani is one of two parking enforcement officers on Ontario’s 2011 Sunshine List, last year earning $101,467.12.
Only one other parking enforcement officer broke the 90,000-ticket mark in the nearly five-year period covered by the data.

That information, showing the number of tickets written per officer, listed employees by badge number. George Johnstone, operations supervisor with police parking enforcement, said he would not release the names of the officers for security reasons — despite the fact that officers’ last names and badge numbers appear on every ticket.

The Star confirmed Khimani’s name by finding a parking ticket with his name and badge number. A unit commander with the city’s parking enforcement declined a request to accompany Khimani on his route. Approached by a reporter while he was ticketing a truck on Hillsdale Ave. W., near Yonge and Eglinton, Khimani declined to comment.

“Not right now,” he said, shortly after writing a $40 ticket. “I am busy during rush hour.”
It’s always rush hour for Khimani. His secret, it seems, is simply outworking every other officer. Of the 1,649 days for which the Star received data, Khimani worked 1,473, or 89.3 per cent. That works out to more than a six-day week.

The second-ranked officer in the per-ticket count worked 81.9 per cent of the days, while No. 3 worked just 63.3. Khimani, in fact, is at his best on the weekend. When his tickets are broken down by days of the week, the data shows he’s written the most tickets on Saturday: over 17,000, or approximately 72 tickets a day.

It also shows even a keen officer can get a case of the Mondays — that’s Khimani’s slowest day at 11,000, or roughly 47 tickets a day. Khimani’s supervisor did not return calls from the Star asking about the officer’s work ethic and overtime.

Khimani’s days typically begin in Forest Hill. Spadina Rd. between Shorncliffe and Coulson Aves. is among his top places to ticket. The grocery store at 418 Spadina Rd. is the officer’s most-ticketed location, hit with 1,651 tickets since 2008 totalling $98,300.

Tzvika Snir, an owner of nearby What A Bagel, said it’s a hot spot for parking tickets, and people park without paying because they plan on making a quick stop. Some will be waiting in line for a bagel and bolt out the door when they see an officer. “They’ll drop everything, run across the street, almost get hit by a bus, and by the time they get there it’s too late,” he said. “They say (the parking enforcement officers) hide behind the bushes.”

Kevin Stott, an officer who also patrols Forest Hill, said he stays away from the area in the morning, knowing its Khimani’s turf until about noon. “We don’t compete or anything with tickets,” he said, but added that officers respect each other’s usual routes.

As keen as he is in Forest Hill, Khimani hits his stride between 1 p.m. and 3 p.m., his busiest period, according to his five-year average. He’s partial to ticketing the posh, mansion-filled Forest Hill Rd., and Eglinton Ave. W. from Yonge to just west of Avenue Rd. He finishes the day around 5 p.m. in North Toronto, zigzagging through the mostly residential streets of Hillsdale Ave. W., Colin Ave. and Duplex Ave.

By expertly plying his trade outside of the densely populated downtown core, Khimani is the exception to the rule. Typically, the top-ranked officers work in the highest-ticketed neighbourhoods in the downtown core, such as the Bay St. corridor. Officers are usually kept in the same areas all the time, so they get to know what the problems are and how to solve them, Johnstone said.

Answering the oft-asked question of whether officers must meet a ticket quota, Johnstone said no, but that they do have to meet “performance standards” based on historical data for the area they patrol — “sort of a peer review, shall we say.”

The standard is determined by combining the last three years of parking ticket data for the area. If the historical data shows a drop in an area, then the standards would be adjusted.
“There’s nothing in our writings that say that they have to go and write so many tickets per day,” he said, adding that standards for the downtown are higher than standards for Scarborough because of traffic volume.

But officers’ performance is reviewed every 21 days. If they fail to meet the historical data, parking managers will review the officer actions, including the number of bylaws they’re enforcing.

“They do have to work, obviously. They can’t just come in and drive around,” he said.
Are officers taught how lenient to be? Johnstone said it is up to the officer at the time they’re issuing the ticket. An officer would never be told he or she was writing too many tickets, he said
 
It's a total cash grab on the cities part and the green hornet's part!

The only bright side is the insurance companies haven't yet figured out how to start dinging us for parking tickets!
 
It's a total cash grab on the cities part and the green hornet's part!
The City says they dont work on commission, but I'm not sure I believe that. It wouldnt surprise me if they get under-the-table perks for writing more tickets


The only bright side is the insurance companies haven't yet figured out how to start dinging us for parking tickets!
Please dont give the insurance companies any ideas!!!! :Crying2:
 
I received a parking ticket for parking next to a fire hydrant. Which is as it should be right?

But the fire hydrant was in the middle of a hedge.

It was in the fall and with the hedge turning colour and the hydrant being yellow there was no way I could see it.

Anyways I appealed but was never contacted with a court date. Never heard of it again.
 
This officer likes to hide behind the signs aiming his radar gun at speeders. He has the highest count dollar value of issuing speeding tickets.



:rofl!::rofl!:
 
I just drove past another radar trap 1 hour ago. Its the same one on the Bayview extension, southbound just below the Bloor bridge. Crafty fuckers, they learned how to hide better there now too
 
They are already in use. Camera's at busy intersections in Brampton are common and I believe the west end of the city does too.

Check out this winner!





He's on the sunshine list because of all the court duty. This dude lives for giving out parking tickets. I wonder if he's a regular at the Ford's house for dinner?
 
Repoman said:
They are already in use. Camera's at busy intersections in Brampton are common and I believe the west end of the city does too
I know. The news link I posted referred to NY reducing the amount of time on yellow lights motorists had, so they would get more tickets.

And of course red light cameras have nothing to do with reducing accidents, and everything to do with generating revenue
 
Repoman said:
They are already in use. Camera's at busy intersections in Brampton are common and I believe the west end of the city does too.

Check out this winner!





He's on the sunshine list because of all the court duty. This dude lives for giving out parking tickets. I wonder if he's a regular at the Ford's house for dinner?

I have seen this guy before! He really takes his job too seriously. He was handing out tickets as if he was giving candies to children.
Don't tell me it is just a job but I hate parking enforcement officials.
 
I think its kinda funny they're all wearing bullet-proof vests now :biggrin2:
 
Another cop with anger issues.

Another cop with anger issues.

Until the video came out the young man was charged with attacking an officer. Now the truth comes out after many cover ups. I have friends that are good cops but like any profession bad apples emerge. I now hope the young man gets compensation and some jail time for the cop.

A Barrie police officer who was caught on video punching and kneeing a man while he was pinned face down on the ground testified he had to use force because he feared for his life, a court heard, Thursday.

“I was afraid for my own personal safety,” Const. Jason Nevill said. “I was fighting for my life.”

The officer, who has been employed with Barrie police for more than 10 years and who has a string of public complaints against him, is now on trial for assault causing bodily harm, fabricating evidence and obstructing justice.

Jason Stern, who was 25 at the time of the incident, testified he had no idea why he was attacked by the officer.

He said security guards at the Bayfield Mall called police because his friend broke a Christmas ornament in the mall hallway on Nov. 20, 2010.

The video, played in court, shows Stern with his girlfriend and another couple walking through the mall when his friend swipes at an ornament hanging from the ceiling. All four leave the mall, but Stern returns because he forgot his wallet.

He is met by two security officers who tell him to remain until police arrive.

“I figured they would make him come back and pay for the ornament,” Stern testified.

The video shows him calmly waiting with the guards until Nevill arrives in his cruiser.
After they talk for 25 seconds, Nevill suddenly attacks Stern, who is then pinned face down on the pavement by the two security officers while Nevill is seen body slamming, punching and kneeing Stern more than a dozen times in the head and neck for several minutes.

Stern is later taken to hospital and ended up with a concussion and stitches and several bruises.

Both Stern and his girlfriend testified they had six Coors Light beers over the course of the evening, starting at their nearby condo and then they walked over to the mall with the other couple to go bowling. They testified that, while they could feel the effect of the alcohol, they were not intoxicated.

But in court on the witness stand, Nevill insisted Stern was drunk and belligerent.

“You did realize that this was over a Christmas ornament?” asked Crown attorney Brenda Cowie.
But the officer said he wanted to arrest him for being drunk in public.

Nevill added he felt threatened by Stern because he had his hands in his pockets.

“The pocket is the unknown,” Nevill said. “There could be a weapon in there.”
But on an average November night, “it’s cold out,” the Crown pointed out.

As Cowie replayed the video, she pointed out how all three men — the two security guards and Stern — were standing around the outside of the mall with their hands in their pockets.

Initially, Stern was charged with assaulting a police officer.

“I was terrified. I’ve never been in trouble before,” he testified.

Faced with a lengthy prison sentence, Stern and his parents hired a lawyer who subpoenaed the mall to get the video, which the Crown never knew existed, court heard.

Once the lawyer brought the video to the Crown, the charges against Stern were dropped.

The officer was then charged with assault causing bodily harm. He was also charged with fabricating his evidence against Stern; his notes state he only hit Stern twice while the video shows over a dozen kicks and punches.

The video can be seen on the Examiner’s website.

Stern testified he was polite with Nevill, but said the officer became upset because he refused to tell the officer the name of his friend who broke the ornament. He said he kept asking for a chance to retrieve his wallet in the mall, but was refused.

The Crown pointed out there is nothing on the video that suggests Stern was belligerent.

“You started this physical confrontation,” said the Crown. “The video shows you struck him while he was face down, even after the cuffs were on.”
“He was spitting at me,” Nevill replied.

“You kneed him in the groin,” said the Crown.

“He was resisting arrest,” said the officer. “I was fighting for my life here, and losing.”
The Crown also pointed out that Nevill — who weighs 230 pounds and lifts weights — is much stronger and more muscular than Stern.

“You look like you work out,” said the Crown.

“I’ve seen the inside of a gym a few times,” Nevill agreed.

“You’re a big UFC fan,” said the Crown.

“I like the UFC, yes,” Nevill replied.
The Crown also questioned Nevill about a lengthy list of public complaints and disciplinary measures against Nevill.

“Everybody does,” he answered.

The trial continues April 5.



 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom