John suing escort for loan... escort claims contract is meaningless

[jeg]

I came across a case that is heading for trial where a John is suing a massage attendant for a promissory note that went default. At first blush it seems to be a relatively simple matter. A massage attendant signs a contract that the monies were borrowed and will be repaid by a certain date.
The massage attendants position is that because she provides sexual intercourse to the John, she is not obligated to repay the loan. The attendant is going to bring the owner of the massage parlour into court to state that the massage parlour is an establishment where the owner knowing permits sex acts to take place.
Funny, although the John asked for the name of the attendants solicitor and was told to F off, the John will be meeting her solicitor anyway.


........ Stay tuned

BTW... This is a warning to all Johns that being involved with a sex worker is a dangerous adventure.

 

[peace]

I came across a case that is heading for trial where a John is suing a massage attendant for a promissory note that went default. At first blush it seems to be a relatively simple matter. A massage attendant signs a contract that the monies were borrowed and will be repaid by a certain date.
The massage attendants position is that because she provides sexual intercourse to the John, she is not obligated to repay the loan. The attendant is going to bring the owner of the massage parlour into court to state that the massage parlour is an establishment where the owner knowing permits sex acts to take place.
Funny, although the John asked for the name of the attendants solicitor and was told to F off, the John will be meeting her solicitor anyway.


........ Stay tuned

BTW... This is a warning to all Johns that being involved with a sex worker is a dangerous adventure.

WHere is this place?

 

[jeg]

This case is in Toronto

 

[peace]

interesting....

 

[peace]

Do you have the article/link?

 

[jeg]

Providing that, would disclose the MP and MPA names. I have spoken to the counsel for the defense and he believes that this will be reported in the papers. It isn't for me to get involved though. I can tell you that it is in the realm of the public as is all court matters.

 

[The cute one]

Providing that, would disclose the MP and MPA names. I have spoken to the counsel for the defense and he believes that this will be reported in the papers. It isn't for me to get involved though. I can tell you that it is in the realm of the public as is all court matters.

Thank you for your discretion

 

[peace]

I see...how much are we talking about regarding the loan?

 

[ERecTile]

Thanks for sharing. Except in very rare cases, it's never a good idea to try to extend the fun outside the spa. Sure, there are MPAs that provide safe business "dates" outside the spa, and I've indulged once myself, but in the end, it really wasn't worth it. I've also learned to my own pain that meeting them personally outside tends to end in disaster and pain as well. Keep the fun in the spa guys!

 

[jeg]

My information is a 5K signed agreement and a further $3500 unsigned, I guess the MPA wasn't satisfied with the $3500, because her lawyer would have told her at the outset that it is a contract.

What I find interesting is that the owner of the MP is going to go before the courts and state that a body-rub establishment is in-fact a brothel.

 

[jeg]

Thanks for sharing. Except in very rare cases, it's never a good idea to try to extend the fun outside the spa. Sure, there are MPAs that provide safe business "dates" outside the spa, and I've indulged once myself, but in the end, it really wasn't worth it. I've also learned to my own pain that meeting them personally outside tends to end in disaster and pain as well. Keep the fun in the spa guys!

It is MUCH more that that, if the position of the MPA is that contracts can be disregarded, it becomes dangerous to even think you can help out a sex worker... govern yourselves accordingly gentlemen.

This may be the age we will have to live in.

 

[peace]

I hope they realize that the cost associated with court fees including time and stress....not worth it. Of course if this is a principle thing, people will spend.

 

[HOOKED]

I think in the end it will be much ado about nothing and the MP will be ordered to pay back the promissory note.

 

[User-E]

I don't understand why the MPA would think the contract was non-binding just because she works at a MP and/or had sex with him.

 

[Maurice Boscorelli]

I don't understand why the MPA would think the contract was non-binding just because she works at a MP and/or had sex with him.

The word ''entitlement'' comes to mind.

 

[Winslow]

I came across a case that is heading for trial where a John is suing a massage attendant for a promissory note that went default. At first blush it seems to be a relatively simple matter. A massage attendant signs a contract that the monies were borrowed and will be repaid by a certain date.
The massage attendants position is that because she provides sexual intercourse to the John, she is not obligated to repay the loan. The attendant is going to bring the owner of the massage parlour into court to state that the massage parlour is an establishment where the owner knowing permits sex acts to take place.
Funny, although the John asked for the name of the attendants solicitor and was told to F off, the John will be meeting her solicitor anyway.


........ Stay tuned

BTW... This is a warning to all Johns that being involved with a sex worker is a dangerous adventure.

Thanks for posting this.

 

[franci]

Why would the owner of the spa implicate themselves of any wrong doing?

 

[Wanker]

Remember that a promissory note is a legal binding contract. Up to the judge to determine the charge.

 

[jeg]

To prove the case, it basically means that prostitution is legal and the owner of the spa is aparently going to testify that sexual services are provided. This is not de-criminalized, which is the current state. This means that all MP would be brothels and all the ladies wiuld be by definition hookers. Even if a MPA says she doesn't provide FS, I can't imagine any BF believing it.
The defense is that being a hooker overides a binding contract.
I have to ask my lawyer about this, it is interesting ti say the least. He is a highly regarded lawyer who has consulted with the Federal givernment.

 

[What A Wookie]

The defense is that being a hooker overides a binding contract.

I'll admit to being ignorant on legal matters but I'm having trouble understanding how this is relevant. The loan sounds like it has nothing to do with exchanging sexual services as repayment?