Well, people do have the right to donate their money to causes that don't conflict with their beliefs.
Never said they didn't. You asked a question, I gave a possible reason why they didn't.
Mass sterilization. Really?
Can you come up with another solution to a 30 yrs overpopulation problem? I'd love to hear it....
I would hope they'd try the birth-control thing first.
the problem with that is, do you expect a husband, or wife, who have nothing except the clothes on their back, to carry around a box of condoms in a cool dry place in the middle of an arid desert? Or better yet, to carry around, and to remember to take, BCPs?
And if their religion is against birth control? What then? Keep having many babies who starve to death then complain to the rest of the world that we let babies starve to death......
See, I'm of the mindset that for the most part, people won't do what is necessary for their own good. Especially if it goes against tradition or their belief in an imaginary friend.....so it is at that point, doing the "right" thing supercedes all else in order to solve the problem. Obviously simply feeding the starving masses isn't solving the root problem, else it would have ended 25 yrs ago.
Anyhow, we're WAY off topic here.
here's a better solution: instead of asking me, or 5000 like me to donate $5.00 to help the japanese, have one (just one) of those billionaires NOT take his private jet to hawaii for the weekend...just once. Doesn't have to do it more than that. The cost of that flight would be the equivolent of 5000 of us donating $5.00.
That is my point: 1 person doing something that might inconvenience themselves just a little to help their
fellow countrymen, something so extravagent that most of us who donate would only DREAM of ever happening in our lifetime, or one of us commoners in another country I might add, who had to work hard for that $5.00.
Now the way that I understand the economy is this: there is x amount of money going around. Take where I live in the Muskokas for eg. We have 2 industries and the rest of the economy is based upon tourism. There is no other money coming into the area. If everyone here gave away $5.00 that removes, from this economy, $50,000.00. That is 2 people gainfully employed for a year. Frankly, and some would say harshly, I would rather have those 2 people employed and contributing to the economy as opposed to being on unemployment and being a strain on the economy. As fragile as it is......
Now more appropriate for SG: I saw a report on homeless kids in LA. They interviewed a principal who said that before the crash, she had 3 kids who she knew were homeless in her school. Now? She has 245 and that is increasing at a rate of about a kid a day (or something like that).
Do you want to send your $5.00 to help the japanese or do you want to send your $5.00 to those kids in LA who are living in a van, with the other 4 members of her family? This is the thing that is really getting to me. Gates is off giving millions to india to help them, but if that's the case, he could emply every one of those parents of those kids in LA for years..........and if every billionaire did that? The economy would not only recover, but boom.....