G
Guest
Guest
- Thread starter
- #121
now replace all capitalized words with “butthurt shitbag”. :biggrin2:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Jessica, not to make enemies with you, but I kind of disagree with you. In the Incel movement, you have your "Chads"---good looking guys, with good jobs, who can initially get sex for free from civilians. Then you have your Stacy's....good looking unattainable women. Then you have your "Normies"---nerdy looking guys with good jobs like DRs, Lawyers, accts, who can still get laid initially for free--LOL However, these "Normies" unless they are very wealthy, will probably be able to have sex with an avg looking lady??
Then you have "marginalized" guys, who if they pay from $260-$400 can still have sex with an SP, who looks like a "Stacy."---
LMAO
IMHO, that's why you find a few autistic guys like me in this hobby. We're able bodied guys, who if we keep our mouth shut most of the time, can still have sex with a "hot" looking SP, as long as we're respectful to the lady. The only barrier to entry (no pun intended), is to come up with the $300 cash--LOL
This beats civilian dating hands down, for me personally. The SP's don't care if you have a job, or a car etc etc All the sp's care about is if you have good hygiene, treat them nicely, and come up with the $300. As usual. just my opinion!!
Just too repeat....I think the Incel movement makes total sense. However, where I'm different is that I'm more then willing to pay to have sex with an SP. In fact without SP's, I would have no hope of ever getting laid---LOL
Interesting... so you ignore all the stigma and marginalization that disabled people face and think the only problem in this society is that disabled people "wallow in self pity". Right dipshit because that's totally not-so-ablist.
You say you wish people don't have disabilities... what kind of twisted fucking Auschwitz fantasy universe do you live in? At this point you're not just being ignorant, you are BLATANTLY dehumanizing disabled people. People will be born disabled, will develop disabilities, and will end up being disabled. It's the fucking reality. The question is are you going to accept them as human beings, and so far your answer seems to be no. You understand why I am angry at your posts?
I use insults when needed. To emphasize my point. How old are you? You sound like "wahh wahh someone swore wahh wahh". If your posts are dumb shit they are dumb shit; nothing will change that unless you grow up and fucking learn.
Learn from Winslow and Dilligaf. I like them and I don't like you for a reason.
@ROBERTSON on a CIVIL note, may i just note rather quickly here that, VERY POLITELY, that post was quite clearly not directed at you to reply.
PLEASANTLY, i would like to extend my regards for calling me a bitch. CORDIALLY, i would like to remind you of post #40 and RESPECTFULLY, again, call you a hypocrite when it comes to swearing. on another note, GRACIOUSLY, your point of not me being allowed to drive came right after knowing i was hard of hearing. as it seems, GALLANTLY, this is yet another piece of evidence that, WITH POLITENESS, you are the one with anger issues, MY DEAR, and the question of you not driving seems to be the one we should COURTLY discuss at hand.
would you do the great man @Winslow the pleasure of replying to his question?
if not, then supposedly i believe, GENTLY, that you should abide by CA’s well-mannered request that on behalf of the disability community... to not tell us how to, WITH RESPECT, react.
GENIALLY, your favourite backtrack phrase consisting of the words “childish insults” and “lying” is, COURTEOUSLY, a sign you have run out of, WITH RESPECT, real arguments. AMIABLY, to HELP YOU, i have decided to inform you of its uselessness.
post #35 also WITH DEFTNESS, shows thats even when met with a civil response, your reply is still unaccepting of people who do not conform to the norm and MAY I GRACIOUSLY ADD, rather rude in the perspective of people in that community.
IN DUE REGARD, i shall not waste more of my precious time proving my self-worth to one who POLITELY does not know the correct spelling of the words “of course”.
ROBERTSON said:Do you actually read my posts before you start with your sick rants ?
Its always the same lying bull shit accusations with you, over and over again.
Sincerely, you really should seek help, you are one sick loser.
You are not only mentally deranged, you are also lacking in intelligence, when I posted "wallowing in self pity", that would be obvious to anybody with an IQ above 50, it was referring to you, which you prove over and over again.
Wow, get help, please..
I did not suggest you should not be able to drive because you are hard of hearing, but because of the obvious signs in your posting style, you are an unstable loser.
Not the sort of person who should be allowed to have a drivers licence.
If you are ignorant enough to relate my posts responding to you, as being disrespectful of your "community", keep your self centered attitude to yourself, you will be much better of with those who are outside of your "community".
You say "get help" a lot. What do you mean may I ask? Get help for what? Do you have expertise in knowing when someone needs help? Are you trained in any medical profession that understands under which situations someone should seek help?
What's "unstable loser"? Is it some kind of undiagnosed condition within your white able bodied bubble?
You know what you are doing? You are speaking on behalf of disabled people that you have absolutely no clue about. You think you are the expert of disability despite not being disabled yourself and you think you are entitled to speak on behalf of us.
If this doesn't explain why both me and Muckchelle are angry at your disgustingly ablist posts then nothing else will because you're the one who is obviously wallowing in your white able bodied privilege.
Robertson, what is the reservoir of anger you seem to be holding on to? Or are you intentionally trying to be a prick? I'm just curious.
@The Voice:biggrin2:Robertson, what is the reservoir of anger you seem to be holding on to? Or are you intentionally trying to be a prick? I'm just curious.
Robertson, what is the reservoir of anger you seem to be holding on to? Or are you intentionally trying to be a prick? I'm just curious.
I think you missed my point.
All these things you list with men and with regarding Chads and Stacy's put the fault at their hands, not on the hands of the person who is "Incel".
The term Incel is involuntary Celibacy. These people feel it is forced on them because of society and not as a result of their own faults. That is why they don't pay for either. They should not have too. They should be seen forthwith awesomeness and women should want them. But because someone else has money or someone else has looks, they can't get laid. Women would find them attractive if those Chads were not around and if they didn't it is because the women are fucked up not to want them.
You are the oerfect example of why it makes no sense. You prove that men have a choice. They can try for it on their own, then can pay, they can buy a sex doll. They have options for release, but Incels feel they have no choice and that is all because of someone else.
Robertson, what is the reservoir of anger you seem to be holding on to? Or are you intentionally trying to be a prick? I'm just curious.
So all this talk about the killer being a victim of sorts......Seems to neglect that he killed How many People?
Frankly I think he should be tried and sent to prison not psychoanalyzed.
Careful there Mr. Smerf, you are going to accused of not respecting some "community".
OK. Thanks, I can see your point!!