Ask bobistheowl!

[bobistheowl]

Does this technique work on men as well as women??

Notice I put not one but two question marks.

Perhaps one of those question marks should have appended the second statement.

I suppose if someone was a woman, and also possessed a fully functional set of male genitalia, such as an hermaphrodite, Chyna, the wrestler, Hillary Clinton, or most of the men who post in The Lobby, in theory, it should work.

If you were referring to an act of sodomy, I can't see why it wouldn't work, but I'd rather not conduct experimental data to verify, with 100% accuracy. The risks are too great.

 

[bobistheowl]

Bob, do we have to be naked when posting in this thread like we do in Jessica's thread??

You can, if you want to, but there's no undress code in effect.

The only rule is that you can't quote a post, and add your own answer, unless you look like Reverse. Mariner just did that, a few posts ago, and now he's on my Ignore list.

Since I police my own home thread, I have every entitlement to enforce offenses arbitrarily. Besides, Mariner is a Troll, with no redeeming value as a human being. By breaking the law in my thread, I have every right to talk about him now as if he is 'half a fag', in perpetuity.

 

[bobistheowl]

Bob you're falling behind, probably because you're busy making make believe parties and not inviting me which as most know around here I have a chopped liver complex going on and you're not helping!!!

One more question if you don't mind;

What came first Kato or the Green Hornet?

Kato, but he took a long time, because he knew 'the technique'. Kato was always the "top".

The Green Hornet was known for his "power bottom skills, but did not achieve orgasms, despite all of his hard work. He did it for cheap thrills, not for .png images of crowns and trophies.

...you're busy making make believe parties and not inviting me...

Nothing prevents any of the other invited guests from inviting you, RobintheBoyWonder. I invited six men. You were not among them. Shit happens. I didn't invite "my twelve best friends". I invited twelve people that I felt would make for an interesting party. Hint, Hint.

 

[oldguyzer]

The only rule is that you can't quote a post, and add your own answer, unless you look like Reverse. Mariner just did that, a few posts ago, and now he's on my Ignore list.

Since I police my own home thread, I have every entitlement to enforce offenses arbitrarily. Besides, Mariner is a Troll, with no redeeming value as a human being. By breaking the law in my thread, I have every right to talk about him now as if he is 'half a fag', in perpetuity.

 

[Wise Guy]

Dear Bob ;/Waving://

 

[papasmerf]

Bob I now know your technique.

I am not impressed

 

[oldguyzer]

Bob I now know your technique.

I am not impressed

So...you think the money from my bet with the Idiot will be safe?

 

[papasmerf]

So...you think the money from my bet with the Idiot will be safe?

Hard telling

His Technique is tailored to him.
As I recall the bet was for the lady to review him and you would pay for the session if a well reviewed lady from here was booked.

If she does not kill herself immediately after the session I think you have a chance.

 

[oldguyzer]

Hard telling

His Technique is tailored to him.
As I recall the bet was for the lady to review him and you would pay for the session if a well reviewed lady from here was booked.

If she does not kill herself immediately after the session I think you have a chance.

And, of course, it would have to stand up to scrutiny of the Mods to ensure all is fair and square. Not that I don't trust Idiot....but....

 

[papasmerf]

And, of course, it would have to stand up to scrutiny of the Mods to ensure all is fair and square. Not that I don't trust Idiot....but....

I would rather it stand up on its own.

I doubt any of the ladies would lie.

 

[oldguyzer]

I would rather it stand up on its own.

I doubt any of the ladies would lie.

If the claims of "the technique" are to be believed, the ladies won't be able to stand for quite a while!

 

[papasmerf]

If the claims of "the technique" are to be believed, the ladies won't be able to stand for quite a while!

Don't think he ever mentioned pleasing the ladies

 

[oldguyzer]

Don't think he ever mentioned pleasing the ladies

Hmmmmmm

 

[papasmerf]

Hmmmmmm

I have a solid read

 

[jumpingjackflash]

Bob, will the Toronto Maple Leafs ever win another game let alone a cup?

 

[God]

I am afraid to ask.

 

[Esco!]

 

[bobistheowl]

Bob, will the Toronto Maple Leafs ever win another game let alone a cup?

Every Toronto Maple Leaf has a cup ring. it's a red circle around their genitals, caused by having teammates whack them in the jock strap area, to make sure they are wearing 'protection'

I saw one hockey game at The Montreal Forum, around 1983, against the Winnipeg Jets. The only lasting memory of the game was that one defenseman on the Jets blocked a slapshot with his nuts, twice. Only a Canadian kid would do something like that. Those Europeans that wear visors try to block slapshots with their bum, but the puck still ends up hitting a dick.

The Leafs will win all of their remaining games, immediately after being eliminated from playoff contention, the same as they do, every year.

 

[Raiden]

The Leafs will win all of their remaining games, immediately after being eliminated from playoff contention, the same as they do, every year.

Come on, why the negativity? At least the team is consistent, no?:biggrin2:

 

[bobistheowl]

Come on, why the negativity? At least the team is consistent, no?:biggrin2:

The Leafs are completely clueless, when it comes to salary cap economics. They spend most of their money on injury prone, high priced older players, then spend cheaply on half a roster of average players.

The problem is the ownership, and the fan base. If the Leafs lost every game in the season, the ACC would still be sold out. The MLSE consortium is led by the nose by a pension fund, that wants to earn a specific return on investment. They aren't concerned with winning championships.

To win in Sports, you need to have a primary owner who wants to own a winning team, even if he loses money to do so. The prototype is Mark Cuban, owner of the Dallas Mavericks. He made billions in the first dot com He sold Broadcast.com in 1999 for 5.7 Billion dollars worth of Yahoo! Stock.

If he made 3% interest on 5.7 Billion dollars each year, that would be $171 Million.

Unfortunately, the ownership has no interest in selling the team. It's a cash cow. They would rather fight for the 8th seed, and a possibility of three home playoff dates, than tank a few seasons in a row, to get some young, cheap talent.

I lived in Montreal in the 70's, when it was a forgone conclusion that they would win the Stanley Cup every year. The attitude in Montreal was "Wake me up for the finals", and when they did win, it was "Pfft. It took them six games, and what about that game where they were trailing after two periods?".

I don't watch hockey anymore. If they wanted to improve the game, the first thing to do would be to ban the curved stick. You can't stick handle, or backhand the puck, with a curved stick. Any hit from behind, if a player doesn't have the puck, should be a five minute major, and a ten minute misconduct. Any player who has the puck, however, and doesn't have his head up, deserves whatever he gets.

It's a tough game, but hockey is for pussies, compared to a 'real man's' sport, like Hurling, Aussie Rules Football, or Test Cricket. A Test match in Cricket can last 37½ hours, over five consecutive days.