Daily Hotties

[Wanker]

9/10

 

[Cycleguy007]

She's 20 but she looks a LOT younger....

"They" are obviously playing up the teen aspect of her youthful appearance, for the guys that go for that sorta thing.

This pic would fit in just fine on the Admiral Escorts site...

If it were this pic instead of the other, most of you would be in favour I suspect... she even passes the "no tats, no bolts, no piercings" prerequisites that many of you place on the "hotties" and even has a bit of a landing strip for those that are in favour of such things.

 

[Maurice Boscorelli]

^^^^That pic is more ''passable'' than the first but she still looks to young for my tastes.

Her whole look is meant to attract a clientele who walk a dangerous line with their sexual tastes.

I prefer to stay as far away from that as possible.

 

[LickingGravity]

She's 20 but she looks a LOT younger....

BTW: did you know the kiddie porn laws state that it doesn't really matter how young the girl actually is? It is against the law if she appears to be younger....for eg: you could have a 30 yr old dressed as a catholic school girl and if caught, you could be charged.....

How do you know the kiddie porn laws so well Actually I don't think that you really do.

Somehow I think there is more to the laws ( Canadian laws at least) than that. I can see if you are in possession of pics from some Dutch or Thai kiddie porn site it would be illegal regardless of real age but I hardly think it would be illegal to snog (as the Brits say) your 28 year old girlfriend on Halloween just because she is dressed like an early Brittany Spears video.

My guess was 23 and she's 22 ( edited after CG's correction) - pretty close and she can even drink in the US.

 

[LickingGravity]

Katie...

This girl is VERY cute! (She's 20 BTW...)

Katie can be cute sometimes but this girl is better, I agree.

 

[LickingGravity]

Kendra needs a new hairstylist otherwise a 9.

 

[Butch]

Kendra needs a new hairstylist otherwise a 9.

9.5/10

Picture was taken after wild sex with the photographer.

Why the hair LG. :intello:

 

[Cycleguy007]

Actually, I mispoke earlier... Allow me the opportunity to right my wrong. The lady in question is in actuality 22. Her Birthday is listed as October 26, 1988.

(Farkin interweb thingy... rife with misinformation! :grrrrrr

 

[Bubba]

9.5/10

 

[BEER]

Can't rate.

I will.

9/10

 

[BEER]

9.75/10 I am in love.



Again.

 

[Maurice Boscorelli]

3/31/2011

3/31/2011

8/10

 

[HOF]

Too young looking for me I'm afraid. Can't rate.

Really, if you think she's too young for you, why post the picture?:no:

 

[LickingGravity]

8/10

Smidgeon thin without a whole lot of shape. 8/10

 

[Maurice Boscorelli]

Really, if you think she's too young for you, why post the picture?:no:

I posted the pic for other members to view.

What is your point.

 

[tboy]

How do you know the kiddie porn laws so well Actually I don't think that you really do.

Somehow I think there is more to the laws ( Canadian laws at least) than that. I can see if you are in possession of pics from some Dutch or Thai kiddie porn site it would be illegal regardless of real age but I hardly think it would be illegal to snog (as the Brits say) your 28 year old girlfriend on Halloween just because she is dressed like an early Brittany Spears video.

My guess was 23 and she's 22 ( edited after CG's correction) - pretty close and she can even drink in the US.

Read on McDuff:

"US law discriminates between pornographic images of an actual minor, realistic images that are not of an actual minor, and non-realistic images such as drawings. The latter two categories are legally protected unless found to be obscene, whereas the first does not require a finding of obscenity."

If you have in your possession a picture or video or drawing of someone who is made to appear to be a minor, and the judge rules them to be "obscene" you can be found guilty.

Your example of "snogging" your girlfriend is 1000x different than a picture or image in your possession. There was a scene in 2 and a half men where Charlie and Allen go over to their mother's place. She answers the door dressed as a catholic schoolgirl. IF someone somewhere in power decided this was "obscene" and went out and found a judge who also found it obscene, they could arrest anyone who has that video in their possession. I mean hell, people have been found guilty of murder and sentenced to life due to over zealous prosecutors and judges. Do you think it'd be a stretch? (especially in the bible belt?)....

BTW: I bet I could find (easily) 20 people who would remark that the pic of yesterday's DH is "obscene".....

EOS.

 

[Wanker]

Jenny
Meet sexy Jenny...she loves her unique heritage and martial arts. Give her a good rating!

• AGE: 25
• LOCATION: Orange County
• VIEWED: 136,477
• OCCUPATION: Model
• PERSONAL URL: https://www.break.com
• FAVORITE CLIP: Dead Squirrel Prank

9.5/10

 

[Wanker]

8/10

 

[LickingGravity]

Jenny is a solid 9.5

 

[Maurice Boscorelli]

Jenny is a solid 9.5

Ditto....