Bill The Pirate
Reviewer
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2009
- Messages
- 524
The world changes, baz.
Used to be women vowed to love and obey, but somewhere in the last 50 years or so, we recognized how archaic that wording really was. Problem is the vows you refer to come from an Anglo tradition, framed in the centuries-old language of King James. They reflect those social norms, that culture, that era, institutionalized and carried down throughout generations.
Native American Indians promised to shelter each other from rain and to provide each other warmth from the cold, not to love and obey till death do them part. Different culture, different norms, different words.
Vows are merely that, just words. However phrased, their importance is symbolic, just as is the rite of marriage itself, two people declaring their love publicly and celebrating it with friends and family.
Till death do us part?
In ancient times, life expectancy might be 30 years, maybe 40. In the past century or so it has increased considerably. Life expectancy of marriage in ancient days might have been 10-15 years.
A lot has changed in this world, much of it in our own lifetime. We age longer, marriages end sooner (after five or just two years, as tboy notes), men marry men, women wed women, and thankfully there isn't the same pressure on young people to marry just so they can have sex or just because they already did have sex.
Love and marriage may go together like a horse and carriage, baz, but you err greatly in thinking that love and sex must be yoked in similar cliché.
In the case Blissful notes, perhaps occasional sex with an escort helps the husband keep his marriage intact. Perhaps the companionship, the sense of family, the friends in common makes the marriage far too important to throw away just because his partner can no longer indulge in sex. Perhaps he still manages "to love and cherish till death do us part."
As to your final point, "if one is a believer of the faith then one must take the good and then accept the bad," it's irrelevant whether one is a believer or not, or whether it's your faith or not. But yes, ultimately we all have to deal with the good and the bad.
If the bad outweighs the good, marriages may end, and members here may swear they'll never marry again.
If the good outweighs the bad, other members here may have reason for remaining married yet indulging in sex with escorts, no guilt or strings attached as would be the case in a "fling" with a civilian.
That's simply the way it is, baz.
We are products of our culture. Some of us follow past tradition without thinking, some of us put blind faith in religion, some of us refuse to contemplate other points of view. But some of us are open minded, are willing to accept others as they are, and don't feel the need to preach at them, convert them or "help" them as your avatar proudly proclaims.
No matter how open we might be to contemplating your point of view, I suspect no amount of patronizing, moralizing or sermonizing is going to change this quirky little underworld to suit your taste.
very well put
