Sorrrrry erectile....:Crying/: My bad.....was up all night. No excuse. Sorry again.Umm I was quoting Fuggie...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sorrrrry erectile....:Crying/: My bad.....was up all night. No excuse. Sorry again.Umm I was quoting Fuggie...
I'm probably more familiar than you or at the very least, the same.
I didnt realize it was a competition. :biggrin2:
Dogs are not equal to humans.
"excluding those within a race" is at the very least discrimination, if not outright racism, imo.
@peace :no::no::no: whatever....racism is racism, whether it be towards people or a breed of dog, that's my opinion. Funny this offends you yet when you rate women like there sides of beef, that;s okay:no::no::no::no::no::no::no::no::no:![]()
Thanks Erecrtile:good:It's all good!
Racial profiling in the industry is similar to white cops carding black drivers. You're assuming that a person is a certain way based on their skin colour.
How do ladies handle that issue anyway? Do you ask every client what colour their skin is before seeing them? If a black guy shows up at the door, do you tell him you're refusing him based on the colour of his skin?
You know you can't put an add in the papers when you are looking for employees?. "Only whites can apply".
Same can be true in this industry?. "Black men cannot book me"
There are some agencies that have Sp's with race restrictions listed, Tanya at TGF for instance (won't post a link as they are not an advertiser here.) Its bs but at least they're upfront about being discrimatory (damning by faint praise.)
Again indirectly comparing the Blacks to dogs. :no::no:
Again, rating women by numbers or emicons such as:no::no::no: is indirectly comparing then to sides of beef and devaluing them. If you're going to be put off by my indirect comparison, correct your own before you correct mine!!:no::no::no::no: