Ask bobistheowl!

[bobistheowl]

I have a question, is it better to knock knock or just open the door and walk in?

You should always knock, knock, but not too loud, otherwise the porch person living across the hall will assume that an Escort lives beside them, from the two or three knocks on the door she receives on a good day.

If you just walk right in, the previous session might be still in progress, and if you've ever seen the look on a guys face when another guy sees him in diapers, with mushed peas all over his face, well, you wouldn't want to be that guy; either of them.

Plus the escort is probably doing little tasks, (dimming lights, hiding the remote, etc.), at the last minute, as most Escorts will expect a man to take ten minutes to get from the lobby to her room, because she assumes he will turn the wrong way at the elevator, then have to double back.

 

[Mariner]

Escorts will expect a man to take ten minutes to get from the lobby to her room, because she assumes he will turn the wrong way at the elevator, then have to double back.

Nonsense. It takes ten minutes due to getting off on the wrong floor, banging on the wrong door, and accusing the 70 year old granny that opens the door of bait and switch.

 

[Raiden]

Nonsense. It takes ten minutes due to getting off on the wrong floor, banging on the wrong door, and accusing the 70 year old granny that opens the door of bait and switch.

or pleading for a bbbj with her teeth in

 

[oldguyzer]

Nonsense. It takes ten minutes due to getting off on the wrong floor, banging on the wrong door, and accusing the 70 year old granny that opens the door of bait and switch.

:LMAO:

 

[User-E]

Dear bob, what changes do you think review boards should make after Bill C-36 becomes law, if any?

C-36 is a smoke screen. The only things that will change relate to street action and minors. The whole thing is designed to scare away the guys who are thinking about buying some professional ass, but they don't want to get both feet wet. There will be some public shamings of average guys who don't know the ropes, and the tabloid papers and TV stations will be tipped off as to the time of a scheduled raid at some body rub spot in Chinatown that only the locals know about.

etc. etc. etc. ...

So, C-36 is just a way to try to scare guys into marrying horny fat chicks. That's all.

Thank you, but you didn't answer my question. :biggrin2:

I think you've got part of the reason right as to why they came up with C-36.

I believe their prime motivation is to preserve the 'traditional family'.

 

[oldguyzer]

I believe their prime motivation is to preserve the 'traditional family'.

Yep...two resentful adults trying to coexist, while the male fools around on the side and the woman wishes she could. And they all dislike the restraints the kids put on their divorce proceedings.

 

[bobistheowl]

Dear bob, what changes do you think review boards should make after Bill C-36 becomes law, if any?

Thank you, but you didn't answer my question. :biggrin2:

I think you've got part of the reason right as to why they came up with C-36.

I believe their prime motivation is to preserve the 'traditional family'.

Nothing needs to change. Any discussion of street action or underage is already off limits, except in 'back in the day' reminiscences re: street action.

 

[User-E]

Nothing needs to change. Any discussion of street action or underage is already off limits, except in 'back in the day' reminiscences re: street action.

I hope you're right. Change is stressful.

Do you realize that the discussions we're having on industry forums regarding C-36, are the only discussions going on between clients, about clients/reviewers?

It really hit me when I saw that all 15 of the proposed amendments (Senate meetings) were on behalf of SP's, and none were on behalf of clients, which means that unless the bill is scrapped altogether, there is no hope in hell for change that would benefit sex purchasers. That thought makes me very sad, because all (98%) of my clients were totally awesome guys that don't deserve to be labelled perverts and criminals.

It also occurred to me, that whatever changes do need to be made, if we don't figure it out by discussing it amongst ourselves, nobody else is going to do it for us.

 

[bobistheowl]

I hope you're right. Change is stressful.

Do you realize that the discussions we're having on industry forums regarding C-36, are the only discussions going on between clients, about clients/reviewers?

It really hit me when I saw that all 15 of the proposed amendments (Senate meetings) were on behalf of SP's, and none were on behalf of clients, which means that unless the bill is scrapped altogether, there is no hope in hell for change that would benefit sex purchasers. That thought makes me very sad, because all (98%) of my clients were totally awesome guys that don't deserve to be labelled perverts and criminals.

What would make C-36 go away quickly would be if a guy took one for the team, legally, ie: he tries to get himself arrested, for something innocuous that he could have done before, and then we could get back to having Judges interpret the law, instead of the winners of popularity contests. Let them do legislation, like texting laws, highway speeds, disclosure of food additives, etc; what an ombudsman is supposed to do. Leave the interpretation of what is Just to the pros.

The best defense attorneys would fall all over themselves trying to represent him pro bono, both because most of them hobby, themselves, and because it would be good advertising for future paying clientele.

 

[User-E]

What would make C-36 go away quickly would be if a guy took one for the team, legally, ie: he tries to get himself arrested, for something innocuous that he could have done before, and then we could get back to having Judges interpret the law, instead of the winners of popularity contests. Let them do legislation, like texting laws, highway speeds, disclosure of food additives, etc; what an ombudsman is supposed to do. Leave the interpretation of what is Just to the pros.

The best defense attorneys would fall all over themselves trying to represent him pro bono, both because most of them hobby, themselves, and because it would be good advertising for future paying clientele.

I suggested that before on another forum. I figure if everybody that's active on industry forums donated $10 to a legal trust fund, we could pay all his court costs and support his family while he's going through it, as a sign of our appreciation. I guestimated a minimum $700,000 could be collected that way.

 

[bobistheowl]

I suggested that before on another forum. I figure if everybody that's active on industry forums donated $10 to a legal trust fund, we could pay all his court costs and support his family while he's going through it, as a sign of our appreciation. I guestimated a minimum $700,000 could be collected that way.

I never read those threads. I tend to not learn anything in them that I didn't already know.

If someone wanted me to do it, I would, but only if I got the $700, 000 up front, because I would need some of it to get caught. I might also just keep all of the money, and defend myself. What pooner is going to out himself, just to try to get ten bucks back? The gallery seats would scalp for fifty times that, because there aren't many available to start with, and the press and celebrities would get most of them.

 

[User-E]

I never read those threads. I tend to not learn anything in them that I didn't already know.

If someone wanted me to do it, I would, but only if I got the $700, 000 up front, because I would need some of it to get caught. I might also just keep all of the money, and defend myself. What pooner is going to out himself, just to try to get ten bucks back? The gallery seats would scalp for fifty times that, because there aren't many available to start with, and the press and celebrities would get most of them.

Ok - I will spread the word that you're willing. Shouldn't be any problem getting the funds together upfront. How many women do you figure it will take for you to get caught TOFTT? Have you defended yourself in court before?

:wink2:

 

[bobistheowl]

Ok - I will spread the word that you're willing. Shouldn't be any problem getting the funds together upfront. How many women do you figure it will take for you to get caught TOFTT? Have you defended yourself in court before?

:wink2:

With 700 G's, I think I might do a bit of not getting caught first, to warm up.

I would want to get caught with a lady who was seriously hot - that way, my reputation would be elevated, win or lose, and I might get on on air spot on a sports station show out of it.

The public is always more sympathetic in those situations; for some reason, if the girl isn't much to look at, they assume she's being exploited.

If a guy gets caught with a homely girl, he's probably going to hide his face with a suit jacket, or a paper bag or two, going in or out of court. If she was really hot, he signs autographs, and poses for his paparazzi photos. That's top of the news, these days, even on the non entertainment news shows. You could get a men's fragrance deal out of something like that, or a guest spot on a sit com, playing yourself.

Since it's the test case, the hottie would not want to hide her face, either, because then the public would assume she was not hot, and that would be bad for business after the trial. Sure, I'd do it. It would be like being a young Kid Rock for about six months. Who wouldn't want that?

And yes I have defended myself, and won, previously. I would look forward to presenting my first defense case.

 

[User-E]

Do you think Indiegogo is the way to go? Hmmmmmm

 

[User-E]

btw - I will be promoting our fundraising efforts in those threads on those forums you never read - but you already knew that. :wink2:

 

[bobistheowl]

Do you think Indiegogo is the way to go? Hmmmmmm

Well, I already knew that Bubbles spends most of his money on pussy, but I figured Julian had enough game to get civvie. I know a lot of Ricky's, and you know many of the same ones.

 

[Madman]

Wait a minute here, I wan't in on this venture too!

One question first, how does one train a smerf?

 

[papasmerf]

Wait a minute here, I wan't in on this venture too!

One question first, how does one train a smerf?

For 800,000 dollars I will tell you

 

[Madman]

For 800,000 dollars I will tell you

BOB you see what I mean, HELP!!!!

 

[papasmerf]

BOB you see what I mean, HELP!!!!

Put this on your life jacket